CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Sadyrkulova

Reward Points:31
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
86%
Arguments:12
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
2 points

school is our base that we get during the childhood. Of course the quality of education depends on the school that you study in, school program, teachers and your individual features. But in fact school gives us only basic knowledge, develops our minds in general but not prepares us for real life. We do not learn at school how to cope with some problems that we can face working in team (communication problems), we have too much theory and too little practice (school should teach us to use our knowledge in particular situations by visual teaching methods and experience). School should help us in our real life and give us elementary skills that we will probably need in future (communication skills, the feeling of responsibility of every action). I don’t think schools nowadays give us these skills so I think the program of education should be developed and become really useful.

Read more: http://socyberty.com/education/schools-don’t-prepare-young-people-for-life-in-the-real-world/ #ixzz1e20dyKCt

1 point

Photography is a form of art. It express the way people look at things. In a photographer's point of view we get to experience how they observe objects and it appears to them. Art is what you make it. As a child when you are in arts & crafts you begin to create a picture and when you get older, instead of drawing a picture you can capture one with the advantage of a camera.

1 point

Art is a lovely thing and it comes in all forms. Art is creating something. In photography you create an image. Make a moment last a long time. Hence it is an art. Also because not everyone can make the best moments last for long. Photo editing is also a creative job. It is just not the true self from it's original form.

Besides art is sometimes a tough job, sometimes easy. It's just how it is done. But, creativity will remain creativity as an art.

1 point

Photography is art. Photo editing, I don't believe is an art. The art of photography is in its simplicity, and in the artist's ability to capture something with just a snap of a lens. The art is in the angles, the background and the subject matter, not the editing stages (if there are any). Many people belittle photography as an art form, citing the fact that yes, any schmuck can pick up a camera and take a picture. But, growing up around my mother who is a professional photographer, I can say that if the viewer understands what they're looking at, and has the ability to appreciate minimalism, then yes photography is absolutely art.

1 point

In terms of the time consuming, fast foods save lots of time. According to Barton Sparagon, M.D. medical director of the Meyer Friedman Institute in San Francisco, and an expert on stress- related illness, the above are all symptoms of a modern epidemic called “hurry sickness”. In my point of view, it is very convenience that there are places where we can get food very fast and in any appropriate time. Junk foods destroy mealtimes.

1 point

There's nothing wrong with fast food, as in food which can be prepared and eaten quickly. It's actually very convenient nowadays when most people would rather spend time doing something other than cooking or waiting for someone to cook for them.

The only problem with fast food is that in many places it's associated with junk food, as if only burgers and fried chicken could be served fast.

In Japan, for example, fast food can be quite nutritional and varied. Check out Sukiya's menu, which includes beef, fish, curry, salads and more. This thing can be impressively faster than McD and won't get you hooked on ketchup.

2 points

I feel that chicken came first as only a chicken can lay an egg. But before the first egg other animals could have evovled into a chicken.

2 points

the big bang really never explains where the universe came from, just how it was formed, a big misconception about the big bang is that it states something formed from nothing, but thats not at all what the big bang theory states, everything was there before the big bang, just condensed. nothing new was created simply an expansion, thus I will not say the big bang created the universe however I do believe at least to some extent that the big bang happened, just if its really the case what I'd like to know is, where did the condensed universe inside the big bang come from?

2 points

I hope your joking. first of all, if you aren't it doesn't seem you understand what science really is, a lot of people nowadays don't. science is an understanding of anything, science is our skill in finding the truth. some things we can't scientifically explain because we don't understand it to begin with, in other words if you understand something, thats technically a science or you could percieve it as scientific. in fact the "scientifically explained" or any form of that expression is silly, science is simply looking for the truth and nothing else, sure sometimes we can be wrong and say X is the truth when its really Y, and end up calling X scientific simply because there is something we got wrong. religion is not a search for the truth, its already claimed "truths" never trying to figure it out but merely claimed. if you want to find the truth, you look for it, not find any old explanation for it without knowing. so if god is real, and he is explainable and you could understand him, than there is science behind him. science never claims anything, only the people using it does.

second of all I think we found evidence some guy ended up finding a way to map out were most of the stars we see are going and there formation as a universe, it turns out that all the stars are moving away from one point I think, or something like that giving evidence for the big bang.

1 point

Let me clarify my position, since I misstated it. The first question that needs to be asked is " what kind of life is it?" If it is a human life then no reason for abortion is adequate. Therefore no further questions are needed.

I find it rather disturbing that we want to have sex without commitments so badly that we are willing to kill the result of that sexual union.

But isn't that just like human nature, everything is just fine until something conflicts with what we want and stands between us and what we desire. Then laws get broke, peace treaties ignored, property taken and people killed. But the most heinous crime is when we make laws to exonerate ourselves. When we call evil, good. We may be guiltless before the law but that doesn't mean we are not without real quilt. But praise be to God that He has provided a solution to the two greatest problems man faces, guilt and death. With God there is forgiveness, but not without great cost.

Sadyrkulova has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here