Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Sandersmaris
| Reward Points: | 7 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 7 |
| Debates: | 0 |
I agree. As Gulliver changed sizes, the way people treated him changed.
The most satirical device that is the most significant in "Gulliver's Travels" is invective because Swift shows abusive language as well as illustration towards the English government. Gulliver's size symbolizes the English government in power and therefore shows the government as somewhat abusive in contrast to Gulliver's size. As Gulliver said, "I had a reason to believe I might be a match for the greatest armies they could bring against me...(Pg. 638)"
I agree also, New England really explored land and more people settled there.
I agree, New England did create a stable colony and a stable economy.
Chesapeake was not successful because it was random in development, diseases took ten years off of settlers, and the men couldn't really find women and land.
New England was more successful. New England had a healthy environment, the settlement was more natural than Chesapeake and their democracy is still being used today.
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
