"Wouldn't that just increase demand, and wouldn't supply simply increase as a result?"- the drug trade does not work the same as a market economy. Regardless of demand, there is always going to be a point at which the supply cannot increase.

"yes drugs would be a little harder to get (but only a little, people get drugs in jail all the time.)"- do you really think that they get just as much drugs as if they weren't in jail?

"that a cop took away someone else's drugs doesn't seem to make it any harder for another person entirely to get them."- If someone goes out and buys drugs and gets caught with them and takes them away, they are also being taken away from someone who could have bought them in the first place.

"I think your argument assumes there is some way to put almost everyone who takes drugs in a jail where they cannot get drugs."- im not saying that there is no access of drugs in jail, but that the drugs that people are caught with help to decrease the supply of the drugs. If the drugs were never taken away, the supply would obviously be higher.

"the illegality has not made them harder to get in the least I don't believe."- the fact that the government takes any illegal drugs away from the people they find them with somehow means there won't be less than if they didn't take them away?

"Do you have stats that say otherwise? I'm curious."- how could i have statistics on a hypothetical situation?

I don't see how increasing the supply of drugs in this country would make our current situation any better.

Even after the first atomic bomb was dropped the Japanese government refused to surrender. When the leaders of a country don't care about their citizens, they lose them.

"Maximize profit in war and death."- so far, we have had 5,378 casualties in the wars and another 2,819 dead from 9/11. We have also spent 972,041,000,000 dollars on both wars. Yeah, we gained a lot.

"U.S.A. government wants global dominance"- just because we are the most powerful country, doesn't mean we want to control the world. If we wanted to, we would definitely be fighting in more places than Iraq and Afghanistan.

"were being paid huge amounts of money to do simple tasks that ordinarily the military does it with no bid contracts."- they made money by giving it away?

"it is known as a false flag. A false flag is a tactic where the government masquerades a attack by doing the attack by themselves and blaming it on someone else."- this does nothing for your argument.

"the facts are buildings don't FALL at FREE FALL Speed no matter what circumstances unless it is a demolition."- the building was designed to collapse downwards. Supports of the building melted and when the top fell, it pushed the rest down with it. You really don't know anything about physics.

"Lastly, simplest logic is the North Tower was hit first yet the South tower collapse first, simple physics says that is impossible"- lol, what law of physics explains that that is impossible?

The United States because I live in the United States........

Its not ridiculous because the teams pay the athletes according to how much money they bring the team.

Are you suggesting that you do not need evidence to support the statements that you make?

"I'm simply giving an example of a fairly common occurrence."- you gave absolutely no example. It was a completely generalized statement.

Besides showing that you think its wrong for the US to get involved in other countries affairs, you need to show why it is wrong for the US to get involved. There needs to be some kind of example to show why its a bad thing. You can't just say its a bad thing.

How could you not refer to any nation in particular? You need an example to back up what you are saying.

It really depends on the dictator. If the dictator is killing a lot of innocent people, then a war may be worth his assassination.