and what exactly is the right way of taking it? To quote Bill hicks..."If you look at Rodney King video in reverse, you'll see the cops help Rodney up and send him on his way home". Should we perhaps blindfold ourselves and look at love?

It can actually. Take Romeo and Juliet, for example. If they had just decided to stay away from each other, neither would have died. It does happen in real life as well. Honor killings are common in a lot of countries. If the couple had realized in advance that their obsession would get them killed and hence it's a bad idea to continue it, they would be alive. Now I'm not supporting the killers, I am just condemning the logic. The need to be with another person against individual or even their collective interests has done more harm than good

How is love necessary for survival? Sex is necessary. Infact the less people we "love " the more people we mate with, the more we'll survive

It can happen. There are millions of types of viruses just waiting out there to kick our ass big time. A nasty virus+ badly designed nuclear reactor= Zombie utopia. And the Rabies virus already turns people into sort of zombies. Should it mutate to effect faster, I won't see much of a future for humanity

Atheism is the adherence to no religon. Declaring it a religon kind of defeats the point of being an atheist

I agree with you. Bible cannot possibly testify to the existence of God since it claims to be God's word. So if God exists, Bible is true. If he doesn't its not. The question really does translate to whether or not God exists

I agree with you. Bible cannot possibly testify to the existence of God since it claims to be God's word. So if God exists, Bible is true. If he doesn't its not. The question really does translate to whether or not God exists

If Net neutrality is squashed, providers would setup tiers in which the most viewed sites would be open to the public at the same speed as they were getting earlier. Lesser used/lesser known/new sites won't be displayed and the consumer would have to pay to get it displayed. So it won't increase any quality. In reality you will just have to pay to see sites that you see for free. The arguments they are putting is that if NN is smashed, providers can control and root out bad stuff like porn, terrorism, hatism... Needless to say it goes against free speech. The government does it anyways. Do we want to lay that power in the hands of providers as well

I am against executions altogether. The only reason I want them to be televised is so that people can see that they are not as smooth and painless as they think they. I want the public to witness the same horror as the convicts undergo, or at least a part of it. So that we can finally learn the truth about execution: that they are evil

Putting them in jail for life also ensures that they donot kill again doesn't it? Unless you account for jailbreaks, in which case, people will escape regardless of there being the death penalty. A person who is to die a week later will obviously escape if he can today.