CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Srtgnm

Reward Points:11
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:5
Debates:2
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
5 most recent arguments.
1 point

I think, it is obvious that Lord of the Rings much more better than Harry Potter. First of all, LotR was written around 60 years ago and it is still interesting to people while HP would be forgotten after some years. Second, someone said that Rowling used Latin languge for spells. However, Tolkien created some new languges just because of hobby. I'm not sure in "beautifulness" of language because I had read both book on russian language, but in translated version LotR was written better than HP.

1 point

I think, not immediately because:

1. it may cause dissatisfaction among the people.

2. people who smokes during many years would try to find alternatives which might be more harmful

3. it is their free choice to smoke

1 point

No, because now we haven't really good alternative energy source. Besides, if we stop to use petrol, we should start to use another energy source which can be at least on the same level with petrol and have more benefits. Therefore, why future generations should use petrol if they already have energy source?

1 point

I think yes. As said ThePyg, education and smartness are different, but in my opinion they supports each other. While children studies in school, they learns new information and they understands what they want, what are interesting for them and how they can develop thyself. They also have a chance to develop their talents and improve their skills.

2 points

In my opinion China will win because their population is around 1,5 billion people and most of them are male. Therefore, they might have at least big army. Besides, they spend much money for developing their army and buying weapons. They also have great economic nowadays, when USA in crisis.

Displaying 2 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Unresolved
Winning Position: Yes

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here