CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
pic
pic


RSS Stan701

Reward Points:67
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
90%
Arguments:15
Debates:10
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
stan701(67) Clarified
1 point

You need to identify what you are comparing with, e.g. if they improved economically, what were the downsides that were relatively less consequential?

stan701(67) Clarified
1 point

Your argument seems to be limited to the agricultural effects on the economy. What about the industrial aspects?

stan701(67) Clarified
2 points

You have an interesting point but i'm not sure how Cultural Connection leads to Political Connection / Action. Could you elaborate?

2 points

While I agree with you that Singapore is vulnerable to military conflicts, the risk of an A-bomb is low. Given our land size, anyone using an A-bomb will not just destroy our country, but neighbouring countries and the fishing industry as well!

2 points

that is a very good point. With stable relations, we can forge deeper trade relations and promote more trade collaborations between the citizens.

stan701(67) Clarified
1 point

interesting argument Taufiq. But is it always fair in a war? Winners dictate History

stan701(67) Clarified
1 point

You made a relevant argument with regards to the Treaty of Brest-Litvosk. Can you provide evidence of what Germany did to Russia?

1 point

Excellent analysis. You correctly pointed out that USA supported KMT, which meant that an independent China would be closely allied to the US. Alternatively, USSR supported CCP. So if China fell to communism, it would bring USSR right to Japan's doorstep!

1 point

Technically, Japan was not spreading it's ideology. It was imposing its ideology! She believed in her superiority & natural role as the leader of Asia. Spreading of ideology would be akin to what USA & USSR does during the Cold War, getting their allies to adopt political, economic & social structures that mirrors their own. Japan did no such thing for the countries they invaded.

1 point

So that means you believe it was justifiable for Stalin to sacrifice more than 20 million people to achieve what he did?

Displaying 10 most recent debates.

Winning Position: Stalin's Economic Policies were detrimental for USSR. To what extent do you agree?
Winning Position: Of the 3 types of connections discussed, which is the most important for Singapore today?
Winning Position: Was Appeasement the right policy for Britain in 1938?
Winning Position: Cunning Manipulator!
Winning Position: Should Iraq or Kuwait be blamed for the Gulf War?
Winning Position: ToV was justified!
Winning Position: Stalin was a success

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here