Why are you ignoring the eyewitness statements testifying to explosions in the basement before the plane impacts and in WTC7 far in advance of the tower collapse? Why are you ignoring the molten steel? Why are you ignoring the free fall speeds, which points to not just weakness but elimination of ALL resistance?

"The fire caused by the fuel could have weakened the structure of the building to the point that the structure could not hold up the several floors above the point of impact."

The structure was steel, which transmits heat rapidly away from the source and a lattice, which means that any weaknesses in the weaker columns are transferred instantaneously to the cooler and stronger columns away from the plane damage on the south sides

----

If almost ANY building were allowed to burn uncontrolled, the frame would eventually weaken to the point of giving way, and in this case, it brought down the building.

This is a lie. It has happened many times before and the steel strutures do not fail under hydrocarbon fires.

but WHY ARE YOU IGNORING ALL OF THE EVIDENCE?

---

The government story requires there Arabs who can create explosions 300 metres away inside a seperate building when they hit the towers with two planes.

http://www.loosechange911.com/blog/ ?p=105

The government story requires Arabs to be able to melt structural steel with jet fuel.

http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=D9qEIlNVl5s

http://video.google.com/ videosearch?hl=en&q;=kevin+ryan

The government story requires that Arabs are able to make explosions occur in the basement of a 400 metre tall building when a plane hits it about 300 metres above ground level.

http://911blogger.com/node/11949

http://911blogger.com/node/11384

http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=KmF-VQNEQMc

(In the last link, the guy corroborating Rodriguez is about halfway thru the video)

Also plenty supported by qualified architects and engineers at ae911truth.org

Real elections would be much more sophisticated and open. The burden of proof is on the government. They haven't provided it and all of the evidence there is points to utter corruption in every possible sense.

I can't beleive I didn't give links to the evidence the first time here.

The government story requires there Arabs who can create explosions 300 metres away inside a seperate building when they hit the towers with two planes.

http://www.loosechange911.com/blog/ ?p=105

The government story requires Arabs to be able to melt structural steel with jet fuel.

http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=D9qEIlNVl5s

http://video.google.com/ videosearch?hl=en&q;=kevin+ryan

The government story requires that Arabs are able to make explosions occur in the basement of a 400 metre tall building when a plane hits it about 300 metres above ground level.

http://911blogger.com/node/11949

http://911blogger.com/node/11384

http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=KmF-VQNEQMc

(In the last link, the guy corroborating Rodriguez is about halfway thru the video)

Also plenty supported by qualified architects and engineers at ae911truth.org

The government story requires there Arabs who can create explosions 300 metres away inside a seperate building when they hit the towers with two planes.

The government story requires Arabs to be able to melt structural steel with jet fuel.

The government story requires that Arabs are able to make explosions occur in the basement of a 400 metre tall building when a plane hits it about 300 metres above ground level.

The WTC 1 2 and 7 collapse videos or the Rodriguez and Jennings testimony prove among many other pieces of evidence, that the government story RELIES on magical thinking.410 qualified architects and engineers agree. Go to ae911truth.org

Doesnt prove anything, for or against. Irrelevant.

"using a state of the simulation code"

Where has this code been published for peer review? Who paid for the simulation? does Purdue University receive funds from the US government?

"State of the art simulation system" sounds very credible to the superficial. scientists need details to assess its validity.

The next president (Obama, I think) is merely Bush policies with a more polite face. He even has an excuse to leave troops in Iraq.

I agree with this arguer, even though he doesn't provide any evidence. It IS obviously an inside job, but many Americans want to cling to their notion that the US government actually cares for them, so you have to proovide forensic proofs. Even then some still deny it.

You are correct, but that aint a BBC video. The BBC bit ends where they get a state terror apologist to claim that if you knew how the buildings were constructed you wouldn't doubt that they fell of their own accord.

The BBC is covering this up.

Theres a BBC hit piece on WTC7 on Sun 6th where they will try and make the proof that WTC7 was brought down by explosives go away with more silly arm-waving.

False hope is NEVER desireable. Fear of betrayal at the hands of your freinds should ALWAYS drive to you want to determine their trustworthiness conclusively, and override any and every other emtoion involved. In this case those who dont bother will accept the government story. Some cowards are so scared of government that theyll revert back to the government story out of fear of ridicule or punishment.

You should only EVER WANT to beleive the truth. No matter how bad the truth is, its the only real starting point for improvements. Anything less is futile

So you expect me to believe that the entire congress and the entire house of representatives are against America?

No. there are a few honest people: Gravel, Kucinich, Senator Karen S. Johnson. Most have been bribed, others were bullied with Anthrax traceable back to US military installations (remember the anthrax deliveries?) and a big group are simply ignorant. Bribery is how government keeps everyone in line, not just congress.

"And there is not one person powerful enough in government other than the president who can pull off something that big!"

THis was OBVIOUSLY NOT ONE PERSON. Congress doesn't get to hear about many of the worst government operations. The US government has been running terrorism in the middle east for decades, and people DO know about it. At least a quarter of Americans think 9/11 was an inside job. And they're right. The video evidence, forensic evidence and eyewitnesses prove it. Look here: 911blogger.com/node/10025 and search for presentations by Steve E Jones, David Ray Griffin and Kevin Ryan.