Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 7 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 92% |
Arguments: | 8 |
Debates: | 0 |
He is dead, but probably dead long before any supposed raid on his compound. No video footage revealed, no images revealed apart from a fake which was endorsed as real at first.
We currently have zero aircraft carriers in service, and for some reason we sold all our harriers to the US immediately after spending hundreds of millions on a complete refit. So the UK has no strike power for a good few years. I think we have 2 or 3 carriers on order, but these will be ready for service before all the new aircraft are finished.
Meanwhile on the oceans of the world and in America...
USS Nimitz (CVN 68) 3 May 1975 / -- Active --
USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) 18 Oct 1977 / -- Active --
USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) 13 Mar 1982 / -- Active --
USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) 25 Oct 1986 / -- Active --
USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) 11 Nov 1989 / -- Active --
USS George Washington (CVN 73) 4 July 1992 / -- Active --
USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) 9 Dec 1995 / -- Active --
USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) 25 July 1998 / -- Active --
USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) 12 July 2003 / -- Active --
USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) -- /-- Active
PCU Gerald R. Ford(CVN 78) under construction
PCU John F. Kennedy(CVN 79) under construction
Also worth a mention how many military bases the US has around the world. They have Iran and China surrounded with a European buffer zone around Russia. The only concern for the US is the fact that the Chinese have been injecting secret spy code into their chips for the last decade.
All what you write is entirely possible, I'm just going off what this former school friend told me. He had two girlfriends in school and mentioned how beautiful the second one was. I asked him if he liked any of the male pupils sexually at school and he was adamant that in school he felt straight and never imagined being gay. I do remember how he was as a kid and looking back, there were some clues that he was gay i.e the way he spoke etc.
Israel used cloned passports made from ones stolen from British citizens to Assassinate a leading Hamas figure while in a hotel in Dubai. Alexander Litvinenko was also poisoned with a radio active substance by Russian Intelligence. Just two examples of dozens I could mention.
Not strictly true, I know a gay man I went to school with. He had two girlfriends i school and told me that he realised he was gay after he had left school, around 17 yrs old.
'Thousands of species exhibit the behavior'
But each of the species has a substantial majority that practice heterosexual sex, so homosexual sex is not the norm if it is the minority behavior in each species.
'Yes, they can. Simply not with each other'
You deliberately ignored the point of the question, even so, you undermined yourself, if a homosexual has sex with the opposite sex and reproduces, he practiced heterosexual sex.
'Its existence necessitates an evolutionary advantage. Scientists have proposed many reasons.'
There is no direct evolutionary advantage from homosexual sex, If an Alpha male suddenly began to have sex with other males and not females, his DNA would not be passed on. Give some examples of benefits these 'scientists' have proposed.
'What? How does social acceptance of something change how often it exists?'
I don't think Lolzors was trying to claim that there is more homosexuality because its more accepted, the levels of homosexuality has probably been a stable percentage for thousands of years.
The mainstream media has ignored witness testimony of an accomplice who tossed a flair/smoke grenade from the opposite end of the cinema to the arrested man. Looks like he had an accomplice. Obama has made several statements about gun control in the past. Something tells me this arrested man is a patsy who has been framed for the shooting all in the name of gun control arguments. Why would the US gov do this you ask? Because they fear the US economy will eventually collapse, and an armed public will be much harder to control.
I'm staggered that anyone could think the UK could overcome the USA in any kind of war. The U.S outguns us in every military department, is more self sufficient than the UK is for food and raw materials. This wasn't worthy of serious debate.
|