Watch that pro-ISIS troll vote yes.

Evangelical Christians are absurd, usually I don't mind religion. Though Evangelists are far too radical and crazy about their religion, it's like meth for them.

I'll just throw it out here that I can't stand Hillary Clinton. I wasn't too pro Trump at first, but he seems pretty viable and is anti-establishment. I'm hoping Trump can beat Hillary Clinton; Clinton is far too much of a crony capitalist.

There should be a balance, but states rights' are something important which the Fed needs to cut down upon infringement with, like education for example. By statism, I mean an authoritative state with immense central control over socio-economic affairs.

It would be interesting to visit North Korea, but the risk is far too dangerous because of the lunatics that will shoot you for taking a picture.

Judging by FromWithin's profile, it would be an honor to be in part of it.

Do you believe epigenetics are a pseudo-science, or are they valid?

My apologies but I didn't read the article as I hadn't payed attention to the link you posted. I had figured it was just major redistribution to magically solve the poor's problems, but my fault for not reading it. Many libertarian/classical liberal economists who are in favor a free market such as Milton Friedman have suggested a negative income tax as a minor form of basic income. So no, i'm not completely against this idea if it is a basic income in that sense that is being suggested.

And the war on poverty in Canada had a lot less socialism involved, since socialism only makes everyone poorer but more "equal." It's also a common misconception that a free market only benefits corporations. In fact, a corporatist economy goes against many principles of a free market and is definitely more leaning to statist capitalism. One of the most extreme forms of corporatism existed in Fascist Italy under Mussolini, which was definitely nowhere near a free market.

An example of how free markets benefit the people, is that it benefits small businesses and their owners as it allows them to get bigger easily without regulations and cronyism in the way. Due to this simple fact, current big corporations would need to "step up their game" and increase innovation as well as the quality of products in order to keep their profits and influence. Statism hurts smaller businesses and makes it easier for big corporations to stay at the top, whereas a free market will let them crumble easier if they fail to meet the people's wants and needs.

Looking at this guy's argument history, it's quite evident he's a troll now, lol.

Does this guy legitimately support ISIS, or is he trolling?