- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
It makes sense. As of right now, the TSA is patting down little kids.......does that make sense to anyone? A white five year old getting patted down for having milk in his backpack while there is a middle eastern man/woman who could be more of a suspect than the little kid.
Only if it's animated? Animations today are close to looking like reality. In fact it does not matter whether the children are animated or squiggles, I don't care, it's wrong to watch/create child pornography.
There are children in real life that go through human trafficking and have tapes made of them by scoundrels that have no decency or morality. Animated child pornography is the same thing as the real thing. It is the still the same concept and its absolutely sick.
To watch child pornography is beyond a disturbed mind. There can be no reason for it, except to have some sort of harm on a child.
Since its the woman who has to deal with the feeling of guts being ripped out of her womb, and feeling like someone has punched her in the stomach a hundred time, and then left there to bleed...........I am pretty sure that its the woman who should have the most say.
Btw...the above description is not a personal one, but one described by a friend
"If she cared enough to allow him inside her body then I'm sure there is a big enough chance of his managing to sway her decision."
What about a woman who did not have a choice to care, one who was perhaps raped?
About CreateDebateThe CreateDebate Blog
Take a Tour
Sharing ToolsInvite Your Friends
RSS & XML Feeds
Basic StuffUser Agreement