Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 1 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 1 |
Debates: | 0 |
The problem here is your argument basically states that the only reason pedophilia is wrong is because either:
1) consent is not given
2) consent is given but the person is below the age society has deemed acceptable
Option 1 is invalid because at that point we're no longer talking about homosexuality or pedophilia but rape.
Option 2 basically recognizes that the argument is a valid argument but you are invalidating it based on an arbitrary age society has drawn, and that age can change. If we lower the age far enough there essentially is no difference between the two (morally speaking)
Thus the argument you use to refute this claim, which (hinges on the consent issue) is invalid and without a successful refute the claim stands.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |