- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
power to the states
we should keep the articles we just left a monarchy why go to a monarchy of a group of wannabe kings
we have to pay taxes to the national gov. because we need to pay off debt we owe its our we will pay it ourselves
and no standing army majority of the americans who fought werent soldiers they were civilians
North Korea is just waving a new gun they got around thats all.
And as logical people you dont want people who we believe to be a little "on edge" with a weapon like that.
And if we attack or provoke them in anyway it doesnt matter who they shoot at. People will die and I'm not supporting any argument that involves the possibility of a bomb going off
So discuss what to do to get rid of the weapons and the nuclear program
Mckinnley-(3)"Engage North Korea in Bilateral Negotiations that Involve Concessions on Both Sides"
I think by having this one on one negotiations
it won't be like we're cornering North Korea into giving up any nuclear program
same applies with a pre-emptive military strike, where we are actually cornering them
and just waging any type of conflict against North Korea will bring China into the altercation
just removing American presence from the Korean peninsula could get negotiated in bilateral negotiations
in return of north korea abandoning nuclear programs and weapons
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!