Whilst surrounded by bodyguards and anti-terrorist special forces France's President Macron boldly stated; France will not give in to terrorism.The threat of terrorist atrocities to the citizens of western nations  comes exclusively as a direct consequence of the liberal/progressive policies on the loony leftists.

Having had a small modest apartment on the outskirts of Nice since the 1980s I was able to observe the steady increase in the Muslim population and with it the rise in violent crime.In 2016 some 83 people were slaughtered in Nice by Muslim terrorism and now we have one lady decapitated and two other civilians murdered by another of France's imported Muslims. Who is to blame, the terrorist filth or the left-wing political filth who screamed for the importation of these murderers? 

During evolution, humans needed to coordinate mutual actions and they had something that they had to communicate, so language appeared. In a primitive society, environments where people live were full of crises. Communication of ideas was a serious thing. Humans had to scramble to grab information contained in one's speech, for fear of a small accident. And a small mistake made in pronunciation may drive humans into trouble. So language has been a serious thing. Since so, why nowadays a mistake made in one's speech can make people laugh?

There was a time when we were able to respect each other to a certain degree despite political differences. There was a time when presidential candidates had.. humility and dignity. Now, don't get me wrong - I know not every candidate or president in US history has been perfect, but... I think we're way past the debate of whether any of these candidates are "perfect". We're actually debating which candidate is .. tolerable. We did that in 2016 as well. So my question to you is ... is this a new era in politics? Will we see more candidates like Trump? Will we see more debates like the one we saw the other day? Has he set a new standard, or his he just a very very bad apple on a tree that is usually alright?

Youtibe is a website that millions of people have access to each each day. Younger people even have access to things that may not be appropriate for people of their age and on Youtube nothing is restricted from being put on (except the obvious: murder etc.).   There is a reason that there are age limits on certain films, and on Youtube people have access to several cameo sections from several films that have age restrictions so what is the point of putting the ratings on if people can just go on this website and repeatedly watch inappropriate things.   All of this information leads to the ultimate question: Should there be an age limit on Youtube?    

  It turns out I may be suffering from Generation-X syndrome. http://gizmodo.com/5851062/generation-x-is-sick-of-your-bullshit Basically that means that I have to deal with baby boomers in real life and Generation-Y on CD ;)

Proponents, identifying themselves as pro-choice, contend that choosing abortion is a woman’s right that should not be limited by governmental or religious authority, and which outweighs any right claimed for an embryo or fetus. They say that pregnant women will resort to unsafe illegal abortions if there is no legal option.Opponents, identifying themselves as pro-life, contend that individual human life begins at fertilization, and therefore abortion is the immoral killing of an innocent human being. They say abortion inflicts suffering on the unborn child, and that it is unfair to allow abortion when couples who cannot biologically conceive are waiting to adopt.

Proponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) contend that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death. They argue that the right to die is protected by the same constitutional safeguards that guarantee such rights as marriage, procreation, and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment.Opponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide contend that doctors have a moral responsibility to keep their patients alive as reflected by the Hippocratic Oath. They argue there may be a slippery slope from euthanasia to murder, and that legalizing euthanasia will unfairly target the poor and disabled and create incentives for insurance companies to terminate lives in order to save money. (procon.org)

I am an individualist.

President Trump, doesn't bullshit America, like other leaders. I don't agree with all of his policies, but if I need perfect, I will turn to Yeshua. Shalom.

Will humans contact with brain waves in the future? I think, even if humans will, language is still humans' most direct and most ocular way to record ideas, so language shouldn't be eliminated.