Insofar that bongos have a predisposition to **tribal warfare** and violent criminality in general would police time and resources not be better directed towards *Serving & protecting* other, more law abiding groups such as Asians and Whites?Clearly the Bongo's congenital penchant for deadly gang/tribal warfare is never going to moderate never mind cease so why bother risking the lives of police officers, including their supporting staff, by spending $Billions on trying to *change the spots on a leopard*?As the murderous nature of their psyche' coupled with their inborn resistance to engage in such disciplines as formal education renders them a *net liability* to the nation and as a much needed cost reducing exercise should they not be corralled into *Black Zones* with  restricted, under licence only, access into non black communities and  be left to their own devices. 

Most of our trading partners have been imposing tariffs on U.S., imports for decades and now that America has a strong President who has put them on notice that the era of these one sided trade arrangements is over they're running around in confused disarray squawking like headless chickens.America will win, hands down, any trade war. The Europeans and Asians know that if a full scale protectionist policy was adopted by the U.S., they would be the big time overall losers.The days of countries such as Germany and China lending America money so the economy could support the imports from these nations are rapidly drawing to an end.BUY ''MADE IN AMERICA'' GOODS AND PRODUCE.

These self declared ''sovereign citizens'' are becoming a law onto themselves and challenging the enforcement of the laws as passed by our duly elected representatives. 

The use of chemical weapons by the despotic Syrian regime had to be challenged and the limited ''COORDINATED'' SURGICAL AIR STRIKES served as a cautionary slap on the wrist to the mass murderer Assad and his Russian backers.

A black police officer shot dead a black man who had been walking through traffic in Houston, Texas with his trousers down.The dead man failed to obey the officer's order;-  get on the ground so the cop shot the improperly dressed man dead. 

Have the new rules made the site more conducive to reasoned debate without the obscenities and personal attacks or has the imposition of a *code of practise* reduced its *unique type of entertainment value?

Today outrage was expressed at the German motor industry for using humans and monkeys to test the adverse effects of diesel fume inhalation.This is in addition to this nation's automobile manufacturers being found guilty of fraudulently doctoring the diesel exhaust test results of their high polluting vehicles.One top flight executive expressed regret at having used monkeys. 

If the male identity of a bisexual's personality loves the female character of his ambisexual nature then I attest the person(s) in question should be allowed to be married and enjoy all the rights of those within a normal heterosexual marriage.This scenario however does raise a few complications.Which one of the personalities would wash the dishes and which one would have command of the t.v, remote control.In the event of a divorce which one would get to keep the house?I am convinced that given time, the officially recognized union between the two opposing genders of a bisexual will become legal.  

When, how and why do you think Americans, and indeed Canadians, lost their British accents and replaced it with their range of present day more pleasant twangy drawls?Other colonial countries such as Australia and New Zealand have pretty well  retained their 'chirpy' British accents while the Yanks developed their own, much easier to understand way of speaking.There is no American accent I cannot easily understand whereas there are a lot of British accents, especially those of northern U.K which I find to be unintelligible.

The camaraderie and friendly rapport between the site's participants is refreshingly welcome in this  world of social media belligerence and publishing of gratuitous profanities.Everyone should be commended their professional, reasoned and civilized debating  techniques and willingness to at least try to see and understand 'the other guy's'' point of view.All too often sites like this are full of cyber thugs snarling and snapping at each other and forming little coalitions which are deployed to crush and down vote anyone with an opposing viewpoint. But, thank goodness there are none of those anti-social ruffians on our exclusive and refined little club. 

Anyone who believes in the eye-watering nonsense of the Bible absolutely must be so deranged that they should never be allowed to hold any position which involves making decisions that would affect the lives of normal people?

It appears that the degree of belief in Christianity is in direct proportion with level of ignorance of it's followers.The incoherent ramblings of ''the faithful' on this site would bear witness to this self evident truth. 

The professional ''hand wringers'' ( the POLITICIANS) of Old London Town will be out in force spewing their standard meaningless rhetoric about the latest Muslim terrorist incident in London where 6 more innocent civilians lie dead and another 49 to add to the list of those who received horrific injuries.''POLITICIANS'' ( past and present) brought the filth to the nations of the west.''POLITICIANS'' have a number of options to reduce or maybe even eliminate the Muslim problem but haven't the political courage nor moral fibre (excluding President Trump) to deal effectively with their own mess.1)''POLITICIANS'' could commence a programme of repatriation and an immediate embargo on Muslim imports.===No chance.2)''POLITICIANS'' could, by way of weal kneed appeasement,  cease fighting I S I S, on their home turf and let them overrun the weaker nations of the Near and Middle East where they would enslave the populations of those countries and establish a strong base from which to attack the west more efficiently and with greater ferocity.''POLITICIANS'' who are paralysed by their own cowardice and muddled thinking have therefore condemned their respective populations to the indefinite continuance of death and life changing injuries for the foreseeable future.What do you propose is the best action to address, and eventually redress the ''MUSLIM PROBLEM''?

As a supporter of President Trump I'm beginning to feel that he either knowingly or unwittingly attracts critical controversy.A day doesn't pass without poor old Trumpo having to defend himself on some controversial issue or other.He's like a bull in a china shop, except he seems to tow his own china shop around with him just in case there isn't one close by.Maybe this is because he causes drama by doing things that should have been done decades ago and not abiding by the media's view of political protocol.Either way, he makes worldwide headlines daily.

For decades the politicians of the west, especially Europe, but including the U.S.A, must have looked on with great jealousy as the Irish Terrorist groups blew 1000s of innocent people to smithereens and destroyed property as well as jobs.They must have asked themselves, why is it that the Irish have all the FUN !!, and, how can we get in on the act?Recognising that they didn't have any homegrown terrorists amidst their respective populations the politicians astonishingly all came me up with the common plan at the same time of importing Islamic terrorists by accepting mass, unregulated immigration from the failed Muslim countries of the middle east. Well, they must be delighted to observe that their plan has worked brilliantly and the civilians of the western democracies are now getting their fair share of death and injuries, the latest being in Sweden.POLITICIANS, take a bow. 

Fish eating marine life and birds such as seals and cormorants should be drastically culled so the diminishing fish stock can recover and provide more seafood for human consumption.

The graves of over 800 children,( a figure which is increasing)  with the age at death ranging from 35 foetal weeks to 2-3 years old. The Home for unmarried mothers and their babies in Tuam, County Galway, Ireland  was run by 'caring and compassionate Roman Catholic Nuns''. The babies and toddlers were known as the Devil's Children', and were not allowed to mix with with good Christian children.What would the outcry be if this horror was carried out by Muslims? 

Please explain, if you would be so kind, what all the media hype and general hysteria about the passing into law of President Trumps policies .As I understand it;- 1)Donald Trump won the the Presidency by being voted into office by his fellow Party members and by the U.S, electorate  using the American electoral system.2)Every piece if legislation which he has introduced was included in his campaign speeches and were included in the Republican Party's election campaign manifesto.3)He and the Republican party fought the election openly and fairly and came out the victors.4)Are the demonstrating anarchists not challenging the American form of democracy upon which the nation is founded? 5) As I see it, every piece of legislation, some of which may be considered by some as being controversial, will benefit the United States and will help to significantly reduce the Mexican criminal problem, the Mexican illegal immigration crisis, the intake of Muslim terrorists and protecting American jobs.His heavy message to the multi-national giants is clear, if you wish to sell your manufactured goods and produce in the States you will make them in the States, where's the problem in that?6)He is going about dismantling the outrageous and non-affordable ''Obama Care'' as part of achieving his goal of reducing the nation's disgraceful national debt of 21 trillion dollars, the interest on which ( never mind the capital sum) is rapidly becoming unpayable.  Maybe I have misinterpreted the entire election proceedings, if so I'd genuinely appreciate your guidance. 

Just think, minimal security at airports. Enjoy a coffee with your family without fear of you all be blown to pieces. The billions of dollars spent worldwide on security could be diverted to improve public services such as medical care. 

A billionaire Saudi Prince described Donald Trump's ' ban Muslims' comments as a disgrace to America. This comes from a member of the ruling classes of a repressive regime which has totally banned the immigration of all asylum seekers and refugees on the grounds that it would unbalance Saudi Arabian society. Rich, eh? 

The Pentagon's politically motivated rebuttal of Donald Trump's declaration of his opinion that all Muslims should be banned from entering the U.S, until their underlying attitude towards their host Country was established only serves to confirm that they know there are sufficient Muslim terrorists already in the country to cause death and destruction as we've seen in San Bernadino. Why are they here? How would a ban on further Muslim immigrants not make good sense? If X% of Muslims will be radicalized and become deadly terrorists then a simple mathematical calculation informs us that the greater the Muslim population the greater the X% will be.  The Pentagon's pitiful statement of appeasement displays for the first time in the history of the United States, to my knowledge, a fear by defense chiefs of the Nation's sworn enemies and will be perceived by the I.S.I.S. hierarchy as weakness and a clear sign that they have the Yanks on the run. What the Pentagon's statement amounts to is;- don't anger the enemy because they are holding all the ace cards as a result of them being here in the first place. Well, start the long and arduous process of repatriating them. 

Throughout history the politicians of the democratic nations have always been painfully slow to confront aggression and, instead of recognizing a growing threat, ( which is what they're paid to do)  have been notorious at permitting the opponents of freedom to develop into a significantly more formidable foe before facing the menace  head on. Even the United States of America had be be given a kick in the testicles, ( Pearl Harbour) before it ''reacted'' and entered WW2.  In my judgement the fight against Muslim terrorism is too little, too late and woefully lacking any form of long term coherent strategy. Too many Neville Chamberlains and too few Winston Churchill's. 

For decades Americans, through an organization called Noraid funded the I.R.A, who killed and maimed many 1000s of innocent civilians and members of the security forces. The American funded I.R.A, bombed factories causing mass unemployment, murdered the directors of both international and local businesses, destroyed public transport, planted roadside bombs and shot members of the security in the back. The upshot was/is that this terrorist organization, similar to I.S., made the lives of ordinary Irish people an absolute misery. Yet when America suffers atrocities from I.S, and is under constant threat from Islamic terrorist filth the Yanks, quite rightly condemn the psychopathic murdering criminals. Even senior American political figures such as the kennedys and Tip O'Neil lent their support for this vile I.R.A. organization. Surely there is no difference between Islamic terrorist filth and Irish terrorist filth, or do Americans decide which terrorist groups should be deemed acceptable? 

A major U.K, communications firm, ( ''Talk- Talk'' ) has had the personal information including bank details of 4 million of it's customers hacked by con men. Only the big stories, such as this and the hacking of the Pentagon's top security computer being by a British teenager make the headlines, but there are thousands of companies having their secrets and account details hacked every day costing the taxpayer, industry and commerce £billions. Governments and commercial institutions always seem to be in a 'catch up' position and can only plug the security gap after they've been cleaned out and wait for the next security breach.