http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/Does_beer_look_like_pissDana is known for being quick kinky but has she gone too far this time? Do you approve of her plan to get men to drink her piss for her erotic pleasure?
Two single people or a lesbian and homosexual couple want to have a baby but they believe that both a male and female role is important to a child's development as is to know their biological ancestry. Therefore, they decide to have a child together a custody is split between the two individuals/couples. This is known as co-parenting. Would you do it?
Private donation means that the prospective parents (usually a lesbian couple of single woman) choose you to be the "father" of their baby. You often have at least some contact with the child when they are older to know where the came from. I am considering doing this as an act of charity and wondered what people here thought. Would you do it?
The right, headed by Trumpy pants himself, seem to be on a campaign to declare every person that labels them self as left wing as fake. So.. who is the left now? Is it possible to be left in the USA? I can't decide whether these tactics are actually dangerous or whether its just a rhetoric that will blow over.
Please take these as fact for the purpose of these debate:All - you take in all asylum applicants from those countries that are known to be suffering war and situations of torture. This means also accepted many fake applicants. Of course there are many expenses to the accepting country but millions of true asylum seekers are helped. None - no asylum seekers are accepted whether true or not.
It seems that the only Christian argument, that we have these days that has any shred of being logical, for why people shouldn't act on their homosexual desires are to protect children. Of course, we all have a responsibility not to expose children to sexual acts - it is absolutely unacceptable to talk about sex in the presence of children or not preform any sexual acts in front of them. This is the duty of care that everyone has. However, Christians argue that children shouldn't know about the existence of homosexuals. So.. for example.. me and my gay partner... should we not have friends that have children? It is very obvious that we are together. Should we not hug in public? Kiss? Should we restrain ourselves beyond that which heterosexual do in order to protect children?
I have lived in the UK Spain and Germany and it is difficult to imagine any head of government in these countries saying some of the obvious lies that Trump says. Such as.. it was raining at the inauguration or "look what happened last night in Sweden!". I am sure all politicians lie at some point to get ahead but my question concerns these obvious lies that anyone can instantly factcheck. It doesn't happen in other countries. I thought that maybe it was just Trump but here people say that others US presidents are just as bad. So which is it.. is it a problem with Trump or a problem with USA politics in general? Do facts have perhaps less value in politics there?
This steps from the arguments that Christians made saying that no child should be told about gay people. So.. should this passage from the Bible be taught to children:"Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men ""Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."Perhaps this content is too mature for children?
I have been on-and-off in a homosexual relationship for the last few years. A few years ago I was an au pair and I went to visit them recently. The kid I used to look after was asking me when I am going to get married and how many girlfriends I've had. After a lot of pestering I eventually just said "maybe I will just marry [the name of the guy I've had relations with]". Would you habe done the same? What is the appropriate age?
Imagine the following scenario. There is a Christian father that should, of course, love God above all else and want to do whatever he can to please him. One of those things he should do is follow everything in the Bible as well as he can - and this includes not murdering. However, despite his strong belief in the existence of God there is someone he loves more than God: his son. He knows that his son is still a child and thus innocent in the eyes of his Lord. He knows also that as his child grows there is a real chance that he will not accept Christ and thus spend eternity in hell. Therefore, he decides to kill his child. Is that logical? Is that in the child's best interest?
Why did most of Brontos arguments, before people started justly and routinely downvoting them, have plus 3? Here is the evidence that Negligentt and BellaSmella are his accounts.Note the URL address being displayed in the bottom left... This screenshots were taken a few minutes ago:Negligent signs on a goes straight to Brontos waterfall:https://pasteboard.co/GFEdmiJ.pngHe then goes to the second page:https://pasteboard.co/GFEdPvr.pngThen SmellaBella then signs on and goes straight to that page: https://pasteboard.co/GFEeOOh.pngAll the while, the Bronto account is on the same page doing nothing. The same happened yesterday:https://pasteboard.co/GFEfpzB.pnghttps://pasteboard.co/GFEfEu2.png