Just what it says in the title, for the most part. For any new people, welcome. For my old friends, how's it been?(Ah, this lack of emojis... It's kinda unfamiliar from a lot of the Internet. Guess I'll look up something for that later.) Got admitted into a university, btw. It's one of the premier ones of the country. Also, installed Linux - long story, but now I dual boot Windows and Ubuntu.

And any details. 

Bingo. (In case you're reading this from the future and standalone, it's the ontological argument.) 

In other words, should people be encouraged to believe in their fairytales when they're too weak for the truth? Religious people can also comment, because they're still an atheist to other religions. 

Let the fanatics be out. They aren't worth my effort of prebanning. So, I answered the question earlier as, Life is a series of self sustaining chemical reactions. I added some more stuff to it, but I knew that it was a hollow answer. Any more additions seemed equally worthless, for none of them made it complete and exhaustive. Can you try defining it? I'm leaving the closest I've got so far in comments. 

For your religion or someone else's, or even generic, it doesn't matter. Some, like the ontological arguments, are funny due to humour, while some, like the "Low probability, therefore God" arguments, are funny due to the absurdity. So, which are your favourites? PS : Religious fanatics might prefer to stay away. If you can't understand this sentence, then you'll deserve any insults or related stuff that may come. At least don't make the fanaticism obvious, and I'll be fine with your participation. 

On defence - http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/In_the_defence_of_the_idiots_losers_who_ban_any_opinions_different_from_theirsAnother interlink for some context - http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/NowASaint_mentally_unstable_or_just_another_christian_extremistWith this, I hope you'll stop complaining against the cowards that thoughtlessly ban you from debates. Flawed and incomplete. They're not merely idiots or cowards - they're spammers who ought to be removed. I'm presupposing that you understand what debates are. The nature of debates not being directly against them does not dictate any sympathy. As you might be aware, some idiots are being attacked on this site for being cowards as well, which I believe isn't fair. Again, flawed and incomplete. Their cowardice is a reason, but it must not be substituted as all there is. They're afraid of being wrong, even after all that. Therefore, they must ban any conflicting opinions if they can. It also saves your time from being wasted, and you'll be sure that they can't bear having their opinions debated. Yet they waste everyone's time by spamming the website. A debate website is probably the best place for them to stroke their ignorant ego. Doesn't lead to that everyone should bear with their spam. They're using the site's traffic for their own personal, idiotic and twisted purposes. They should rather create some little blogs in the corners of Internet where their opinions would be more welcome to die out. We have a Websites section in profiles, and this site is not for stroking their ignorant egos. They're merely spammers on this website. And, if as they claim, they're sent by a deity, then they're spam on this planet. Another way might be to regard it as propaganda rather than spam, or something in between. You might want to, but considering their intellectual capabilities, I'd find a pigeon to be more persuasive. 

Especially those on this site who try to preach. They're blasphemers. We're really just arguing against apes who can't accept the fact that they have evolved beyond that stage. 

For all those who say that  low probability; therefore God, what is the highest probability for God being a necessity? What is the minimum number of times we have to spin a wheel such that the sequence of resultant numbers  proves the existence of God? 

For those who are not completely sure about the results in their faith, this debate is not. So, what can you bet on something happening on which you have a lot of faith? (eg. God coming back in some predefined interval; or you being saved from hell; etc.) Can you bet your soul on that? Of course, if it will definitely happen, then you can lose nothing, and your faith to your deity will be demonstrated. When you do the bet, I'll ban you from the debate so that you can not edit the argument later. These are the things that must be present in your argument. 1. Your username (yes, you must state it) (no real names or details that can not be verified as yours) 2. Your assertion (the thing you have faith on) 3. Reasons for your belief (can be anything, even as simple as that God is good, but must be present) 4. A footnote that you are typing it out of your free will (that it's not forced at all), you intend to type it, and are not under the influence of any mind altering substances. 5. In the name of *your deity*, saviour or something like that - whoever you'd trust enough in such matters. 6. And, of course, that you bet your soul on it to me (use my username properly) Though I'd generally prefer you sign it in your blood, that's, sadly, not really available right now. So, let your account suffice for the purpose - we can take care of the context later. You are free to choose between the dialects of English. Though I prefer it to be in British English. 

And being rebellious against the God means evil. Unless, of course, God conquered death for his son. But then much of what the most vocal Christians say here falls apart like a house of cards (not like they care anyway.) 

Disclaimer - I'm not affiliated with them in any way. I only ban others when they are filling my debate with irrelevant and senseless fluff, because they'd otherwise make the debates harder to navigate. Or those who don't want to have any idea of what they are saying. (For example, if FromWithin comes here with his political obsessions, I'll have no choice but to ban him.) With this, I hope you'll stop complaining against the cowards that thoughtlessly ban you from debates. I'm presupposing that you understand what debates are. If you already belong to the group, then you won't be understanding anything. In that case, find someone kind enough to explain the little baby steps to you, unlike me. Or do the thing you do best - take my word as gospel that this is undeniable defence for your position. If you don't belong to the group and don't understand that, then I wonder what you are doing here. As you might be aware, some idiots are being attacked on this site for being cowards as well, which I believe isn't fair. They're simply doing what is in all of the members' best interests by banning them. So, be more optimistic towards them. Their beliefs are very rigid, despite being so irrational and shallow. That's why, even though you might feel compelled to try to change them, your endeavours shall turn out fruitless at best. The way this bias works, they'll be even more confident in their (rather random) beliefs than they originally were, and your words might as well have been directed towards void. They are incapable of proper thinking by themselves. And, in fact, their beliefs aren't a result of their creativity either. Rather, they are a result of what their superiors tell them to believe. Also, they're much more obedient than the others of us: so obedient that they'll believe it like mindless zombies. Then, there's no changing it, because you can't command them. They're afraid of being wrong, even after all that. Therefore, they must ban any conflicting opinions if they can. It also saves your time from being wasted, and you'll be sure that they can't bear having their opinions debated. A debate website is probably the best place for them to stroke their ignorant ego. 

Off Topic - Apparently, the debates can be edited, but the moderator panel is not accessible. This message wasn't here originally. 

Who is great enough that God would bargain a deal with him?