All Debates
You are browsing through all debates. You can refine the results by using the drop-down boxes above. You can view more information about each debate by clicking Show Details at right.
Cancer kills around 8 million a year, and scientists are forever trying to come up with a cure for the collection of diseases. Everyone's morals point to one conclusion - yes, if there was a cure available, it should be used worldwide. However, some people object to the idea of a cure as population rises may lead to overcrowding and exhaustion of resources. What do you think?
We've seen Libya, Tunisia and Egypt face huge changes in terms of society and politics. Syria is facing an uncertain future. However, other countries such as the US, UK and Russia are also facing massive political and economic instability. In 2011, huge global opposition to the rich sparked a series of protests stretching from the US (where it started) to Israel and the UK. Countries such as Greece, Italy and Spain have already seen and are seeing violent clashes between police and protesters. The US is on the brink of elections, Russia's elections are shady and the UK's coalition government are hardly successful.
So is the solution a massive global reformation/revolution? Are we in that deep yet or is it yet to come?
Is Russia Today, a government-funded Russian news channel a propaganda distributor? This is an example of the negative position held by some: Youtube Video. I'm not sure on this one, but I'd like you guys' opinions.