All Debates
You are browsing through all debates. You can refine the results by using the drop-down boxes above. You can view more information about each debate by clicking Show Details at right.
For many months hundreds of thousands of Syrians have been protesting against their government demanding their leader Bashar al Assad to step down & allow a democracy to be established.
But Assad has ordered his military to hunt down & kill the people speaking against him & has killed over 3,500 civilians & put over 50,000 people in prison.
About 10% of Assad's military has defected from him in the past months & is attacking Assad's forces killing around 3-10 loyalist soldiers a day using guerilla warfare.
But he has had several million Syrians in Damascus & around the country have pro-regime ralleys, although I & other anti-Assad activists think he forced them to & that theyre acting.
I am personally disgusted by Assad's atrocities he's committed against his people. I despise of Assad & all his soldiers & I give the Syrian protesters my full support.
But pro-Assad activists say that Assad is the good guy, that most Syrians support him, & that the protesters are Muslim Brotherhood terrorists & the army defectors are Islamic traitors.
So who do you think are the good guys in this uprising?
Im not sure which movie is worse.
Let's see well the last airbender was more faithful to it's original franchise than dragonball evolution.
Both movies had 2 hot girls. Chi-Chi & Bulma in DBE & Katara & Yue in TLA.
Why does everybody hate Katara's character in that movie? nobody else thinks she's hot?
The acting in TLA was worse than the acting in DBE. At least most of the actors in DBE were somewhat decent at acting.
Both movies have serious race issues. In DBE everyone is Asian (which they should be white like in the cartoon) & in TLA they kinda reversed the races. The firebenders were Indian, the earth benders were asian, the airbenders were mixed, & the water benders were white.
Now an issue nobody brings up about the last airbender is zuko's horrible actor Dev Patel. Now apparently he does pretty good in that show that he originally worked in but he was one of the worst actors in this movie. I can't believe how over the top he was & retarded in this movie. He didn't even look like Zuko. Why would anybody ever hire him to play Zuko? Man Robert Pattinson would have made a better Zuko, I would have made a better Zuko!
The age of consent is 18 & having sex under that age is illegal. Whether it's with someone over the age of consent or if they're the same age as you.
Illegal means if you do it then the police will arrest you or do something else horrible.
Example: A 14 year old boy & a 14 year old girl are dating & really love each other. They go home & do stuff like making out, taking their clothes off, having sex, & sleeping naked together. Should the government interfere with that?Should the police arrest them & have them charged with having sex while under the age of consent? Should their parents/guardians take the punishment for not watching them like a hawk 24/7?
The good side (No leave them alone) doesn't mean that you think it's okay or that you support it. You can be a religious anti-sexual who thinks it's evil but you live by the quote "I may disagree with how you live but I will fight for your right to live that way" & decide that even though you are against it you do think that it is not the government's buisness. The good side means you think that underage sex shouldn't be a legal issue. Just a personal issue.
I Evan Gragg do think it's okay for consenting minors to have sex. I am 16 & if I had a girlfriend I would do that stuff with her.
The bad side (Yes arrest those fuckers!) doesn't mean you just think it's wrong. It means you actually believe the police should arrest them & charge them with underage sex. It means you do believe that the government should interfere with them & have charges brought against them. If you vote for the bad side then you are just miserable. I label this as sexual fascism/totalitarianism.
All the debates on here about Obama are pro-Obama.
I just felt like creating this.
Is Obama a perfect person & politician? has he ever done anything that was imperfect?
I consider sexual fascism as the government stepping in on peoples sexual affairs.
For example telling people who they can & can't date. Arresting 16 year olds for dating 13 year olds. Arresting 18 year olds for dating 16 year olds.
Even arresting same age couples for having sex under the age of consent.
Arresting men for looking at pictures of naked girls aka banning porn.
Arresting teens for sexting each other.
The age of consent is 18 & having sex under that age is illegal. Whether it's with someone over the age of consent or if they're the same age as you.
Illegal means if you do it then the police will arrest you or do something else horrible.
Example: A 14 year old boy & a 14 year old girl are dating & really love each other. They go home & do stuff like making out, taking their clothes off, having sex, & sleeping naked together. Should the government interfere with that?Should the police arrest them & have them charged with having sex while under the age of consent? Should their parents/guardians take the punishment for not watching them like a hawk 24/7?
The good side (No leave them alone) doesn't mean that you think it's okay or that you support it. You can be a religious anti-sexual who thinks it's evil but you live by the quote "I may disagree with how you live but I will fight for your right to live that way" & decide that even though you are against it you do think that it is not the government's buisness. The good side means you think that underage sex shouldn't be a legal issue. Just a personal issue.
I Evan Gragg do think it's okay for consenting minors to have sex. I am 16 & if I had a girlfriend I would do that stuff with her.
The bad side (Yes arrest those fuckers!) doesn't mean you just think it's wrong. It means you actually believe the police should arrest them & charge them with underage sex. It means you do believe that the government should interfere with them & have charges brought against them. If you vote for the bad side then you are just miserable. I label this as sexual fascism/totalitarianism.
In Washington DC there are millions of people protesting against Obama & his socialism.
But none of the news or medias have talked about it.
Are they censoring out the right?
Right now that country's name is New Zealand & their nationality is New Zealander.
But I think they should just be called Zealand. Who cares if there's a city with that name?
& their nationality could be Zealandic
Right now it is illegal for someone under 18 to date someone over 18.
It is illegal for a 16 year old to date a 20 year old which is 4 years apart. But it is perfectly legal for a 20 year old to date a 60 year old which is 40 years apart.
I think that is stupid. I am 16 & there's 20 year old girls I would date if I had the chance.
What could she do to me that any other girl couldn't do to me?
In case you didn't know sexting means sending naked pictures of yourself to another person.
In America sexting between underage couples is illegal because that is considered child pornography.
I think The US & British Virgin Islands should unite & become independent.
But the Virgin Islands don't have a nationality. They can't all be called Virgins, Virginians, or Virgin Islander.
What should they change their name to?
Right now in order for someone to work in porn they must be 18 or older or it is considered "child pornography" & is EXTREMELY illegal. But I think the porn age should at least be lowered to 16 or 17. At the age of 16 you are old enough to drive a car & get a job & its only 2 years away from being 18. In Denmark the porn age is 16. So why can't we have that here?
Also if you don't like to look at 16 year old girls naked then DONT LOOK AT IT! Problem solved.
Right now North Ireland is owned by Britain.
I think it should be given back to Ireland.
Should the British give Ireland it's north back? or should Britain keep it?
A couple months ago a American Conservative radio talk show host named Michael Savage was banned from entering Britain/England/ the United Kingdom for his views. Jacqui Smith a high ranking British politician is the 1 who banned him. Recently she stepped down but the British still won't take his name off the list. Did he ever deserve to be banned from Britain for his "extreme views"? or is Britain turning into a fascist country?