All Debates
You are browsing through all debates. You can refine the results by using the drop-down boxes above. You can view more information about each debate by clicking Show Details at right.
People who call for a revolution generally reject the constitution and the political system of their country. If they could achieve their goals within the framework of the constitution, they wouldn't need a revolution.
If a liberal called for "another revolution" conservatives would view this as an attack on the constitution and the American way of life. They would call this liberal a communist and would evoke pictures of the violence and totalitarian nature of the Russian revolution.But apparently Sarah Palin may call for "another revolution" and no-one calls her an enemy of the constitution because of this.
It's replacing an open system with a closed system, it's creating a monopoly, it's an attack on the idea of user-crerated content, it's essentially making electronic communication a one-way street.
Of course no-one is forced to have one, the internet will contnue to exist, but I don't like the idea of a closed system anyway.