All Debates
You are browsing through all debates. You can refine the results by using the drop-down boxes above. You can view more information about each debate by clicking Show Details at right.
As the two political opponents divide America with their disgraceful rhetoric and set brother against brother, our enemies, of which there are many, must be rubbing their hands with glee.The question this truly awful state of affairs poses is, which candidate will be best able to unite what has become a very ''ununited'' United States of America?
''THERE'S A BLACK ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT MEXICAN PAEDOPHILE MUSLIM UNDER YOUR CHILD'S BED. VOTE FOR DONALD TRUMP.
Thanks to our shortsighted, dimwitted politicians, past and present, particularly present, we have five people lying dead as the result of a Muslim religious zealot.What does it take for politicians to see that by permitting the continued influx of Muslims they are complicit in the atrocities which they carry out in the name of Allah.
The Home Office settled a case which was supported by the Equality Commission with a Black woman after she alleged an immigration officer stopped her because she looked foreign. Speaking afterwards she said, ''I thought then and I still think now, that I was stopped because I was black''. No one actually said she looked foreign because she was black, or for any other reason, so, all you have to do is ''THINK'' you're being racially victimised and the accused party is automatically guilty.
I've heard an American female politician asserting that the F.B.I, were to blame for the Orlando massacre because they didn't circulate their ''SUSPICIONS'' about the Muslim murderer to every gun outlet in the country. So, it's the F.B.I's fault. That's rather strange reasoning. She also bellowed on about how American foreign policy will have to change due to the fact that a % of American Muslims will shoot and bomb the length and breadth of the United States. So, do you think that the threat of Muslim terrorists should decide the Country's foreign policy or should Muslims be corralled into special zones with strict restrictions imposed on their comings and goings?
It seems that a band of deranged religious zealots have all but commandeered CreateDebate as their own exclusive forum. These weak minded and pitiful fanatics spew out their sanctimonious opinions along with an eternal list of pious quotes from the scriptures in an embarrassingly juvenile manner, all in a futile attempt to convince normal people that the fanciful notions of a bundle of daydreamers of 2000 years ago are true. Is this the end of Create Debate as we know it?
As a non American I remember clearly a broadcast by Barack Obama during his electioneering spin stating that the ''Black problem would have to be addressed''. At the time I thought;- well good, here is someone with the political courage to publicly mention ''the problem'' and perhaps the moral fibre and persuasive ability to tackle what seems to be a crisis. Did he, or was he all fart and no crap?
Was the disgraceful stifling of free speech by blacks and others that denied Donald Trump his right to promote his Presidential candidacy in Chicago the start of ''mob rule'' in the United States of America? American's are quick to condemn repressive regimes in such countries as China and North Korea, yet seem to oblivious to the violent intimidation of those involved in the democratic political process by blacks and other anarchist groups. No matter how much you may disagree with someone's view point you should be prepared to defend threr right to make their statement without fear of violent protests.
Was the disgraceful stifling of free speech by blacks and others that denied Donald Trump his right to promote his Presidential candidacy in Chicago the start of ''mob rule'' in the United States of America? American's are quick to condemn repressive regimes in such countries as China and North Korea, yet seem to oblivious to the violent intimidation of those involved in the democratic political process by blacks and other anarchist groups. No matter how much you may disagree with someone's view point you should be prepared to defend threr right to make their statement without fear of violent protests.
Everything else being equal, i.e, rules etc, do you feel we would behave differently if we all met somewhere, such as a private office to discuss the various topics presented for debate?
Why does it have to be the Yanks who uncover wrong doings?
Earlier this year the United States uncovered serious corruption in F.I.F.A, the world governing body for international football, despite soccer not being America's national game. The main soccer playing nations of the world knew what was going on, huffed and puffed a bit, but did nothing. Indeed many nations, especially Russia tried to pooh pooh the issue. Then there was the willful fraudulent activities by Volkswagen, again it took the American standards institutions to catch this German chicanery. Unlike Europe, the Yanks are not impressed by the influence and clout of the big corporations and go straight for the jugular, as B.P. discovered after their spillage in the Gulf of Mexico. Three cheers for Uncle Sam.
Today a British woman was sentenced to a six year prison term for killing a serial paedophile who had previous convictions, and of course continued to abuse innocent children each time he was released. Going to clink doesn't change a paedophil's diseased mind so why do the mentally defective authorities not chemically castrate or execute the filth by lethal injection thus helping to protect our children and avoiding wasting taxpayer's money?