Arguments for and against God's existence.  I'd like the negative position to take on an equal burden of proof and provide arguments against God's existence, e.g. the problem of suffering, divine hiddenness, etc.

Its a pretty popular question! I mean, nintendo and sega (not sure if both of them did) made a olympic games about Sonic team vs Mario team. Also Sonic made a guest appearance in super smash bros Brawl! So I want to know, Which character is best overall?

What's better - England or the U.S.? DEBATE!

TV is better than books because, it is faster and some people can't read.

  Is the Bible true? Did the Resurrection happen?   I believe the Bible is true, and that the Resurrection happened, but I thought it would be interesting to see other people's belief's and would be interesting to debate. 

I am not spamming posts friends, actually if you read my posts you will find them different with different quotes from the Bible ,only I repeat my post when someome else is insisting on an idea without reading my posts, then I become obliged to answer him again below his post with suitable post. So please read and argue each post of mine logically.  

Oh no, did I ask the great question that atheists can't stand to hear?   Perhaps the negative position may be that the term "atheism" is incorrect?  The argument that a person cannot be a christian because of his or her flaws is also quite weak.  Christianity will stand the test of time as God is the one and the only.  Scientists make scientific errors all of the time.  Jesus Christ has never made a mistake and prophecies in the Bible have been and are still being fulfilled today.  God has been a gracious Father to provide both the atheist and christian the solid evidence of His truth.

 Music help them focusing on their works and ignoring all the noise around them like people talking, laughing, object stuff noise. They hear nothing but music. i love music and it help me focus alot

**This debate is part of a test grade and only for DMS students, please.**Requirements for this debate:-You must write a detailed, original (your own) response to EACH SIDE (2 comments) that includes sources/evidence (sources from packet, artifacts from Pop-Up Museum, and Declaration of Human Rights)-You must reply to other comments (in a respectful, polite way) and vote (thumbs up/down) on comments.Questions to think about, write about:---Is it more important that artifacts be seen in their original location or by the most number of people in a museum location (even if it is in another country)?---Is it okay to remove artifacts in order to keep them safe from destruction (weather, war, etc.)?---Is there a difference between "spoils of war" and art acquired through corruption and theft?

I think we all agree murder is wrong, so why do some people think abortion is right and ok to do? That contricicts saying you are against murder, yet condoning it with abortion. 

This debate invites you to contribute your thoughts on who ought to be honoured as the rightful founder of Singapore.   You are to make use of the following information to help you: 1) Previous individual/group/class definitions of "Founding" to structure your arguments on what constitutes our criteria in recognising a "Founder". 2) Evidences shared in the last lesson based on the 9 sets of readings we went through in class.   3) The question cards which have been distributed to you. Please use these to evaluate your friends' arguments so as to gain points for your stand!     Enjoy the debate and remember not to get personal in your comments!