Biden squeaked out that unless the cyber attacks on the U.S., stopped there was going to be a real ''SHOOTING WAR''.Most of the cyber attacks on our Utilities and public services have been due to the Russian sponsored 'Ransom Wear' hackers.So, boys and girls, as Biden's (not-so) veiled threat was as frightening as the death rattle of a dying budgie it looks like we're heading for military conflict with Russia.Any thoughts on the likelihood of him losing face and backing down after Russia calls his bluff,  or will he engage the nation in a real ''shooting war'' with one of the world's leading nuclear powers?  

This question is aimed at individualists: Can an anarchic or individualist based society based on free choice work? Is the individual strong enough to take the burden?Probably the strongest evidence I've seen against this is the Asch conformity experiment, where about 75% of participants overtly went with majority opinion even when they knew it to be false. Can an individual be held responsible when even the choices of their peers can be a coercive influence?Many revolutions and ideological movements in the past typically involve a small minority of motivated actors that overthrow a lazy and unmotivated conformist supermajority.Also, just about every political system tends towards two-party systems with oscillation between them that could be mistaken for randomness, even in political systems with a multiplicity of meaningfully varied parties. Much of this may be down to strategic voting and appeals to particular groups, but I also think this indicates a lack of thought and lack of allegiance to any ideals.

 At present, mobile phones are popular for everyone in our society. Mobile phones are common facilities for all ages. They can be used to communication between two persons or more than two persons everywhere and every time. So, mobile phones are important equipment for people nowadays.

After 8 minutes of online debate, use what you and others wrote to generate a thesis using our formula:AlthoughSubjectOpinionReason 1 (because)Reason 2 (because)Rebut "Although" statementWrite this on your blank sheet of paper in your folders and turn it in.

After 8 minutes of online debate, use what you and others wrote to generate a thesis using our formula:AlthoughSubjectOpinionReason 1 (because)Reason 2 (because)Rebut "Although" statementWrite this on your blank sheet of paper in your folders and turn it in.

We are regularly saddened by images of discarded plastic materials killing marine life on an industrial scale and permanently contaminating the land.To add to our dismay we are frustrated in the knowledge that as we as individuals can do little to help stop this environmental  destructive material accelerating the demise of our planet.So, as the plastic bottles, and other discarded plastic refuse bob up and down in our oceans and rivers causing pain and death to many of earth's creatures no one, but no one in authority seems to give a tinker's damn.

To all intents and purposes Donald Trump is yesterday's man and should be consigned to the history books.However, his strong personality and clear pro-American views appear to put the shits up the raggle-taggle-gypsies of bumbling Biden's fractured administration.A strong personality doesn't necessarily mean someone who is well liked.A strong personality is normally the hallmark of a respected and even feared figure who can have his/her adversaries soiling their trunks in dread and someone who MUST BE CANCELLED AT ALL COSTS, so the people will not hear the truth.

Hello:Trump started his own social network, GETTR as a FREE SPEECH MAGA-alternative to sites like Facebook and Twitter.  But, then reams of jihadi-related material began showing up on his site, including graphic videos of beheadings..  So, what did Trump do??He CANCELLED 'em.Bwa, ha ha ha ha ha..excon

There hasn't always been a divide between science and morality or science and religion.  But now it can be hard to tell how far science should go in finding answers.  Can there be a co-existence between the two?  Especially when personal belief may make a person lean towards believing morality should draw a line in how far a scientist should go for scientific study?

Should there be a website that students can approach. A website so to speak that students will be able to debate and state what they believe. Also a website that does what teachers preach, "let the students have a voice". This website would be monitored of course. 

MONTAGE: FAUCI GIVES EVERY POSSIBLE ANSWER ON MASKS & COVID‘People should not be walking around with masks’https://news.grabien.com/story-montage-fauci-gives-every-possible-answer-masks-covid

All the Christians praying to the sky, the Muslims praying to the ground and Jews praying to walls hasn't stopped the spread of the deadly Coronavirus.Indeed this highly contagious disease is spread just as rapidly, if not more-so in crowded places of worship as anywhere else.WHAT CONTROLS THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 IS BEING IMMUNIZED WITH ONE OF THE THE ''MAN-MADE''  VACCINES. 

Should students sacrifice a bit of their health for their study? I think they should. Because everyone should work to the extremes. If you get to keep your general health on purpose and you don't work very hard, while your opponent sacrifice a bit of his health to work harder than you with his general health not influenced much, he defeats you. Of course health should be kept, but getting the general health kept is enough (It's stupid of one to sacrifice his general health). A small part of one's health may be sacrificed with no sorry.

For many decades ''speaker's corner'' in Hyde Park, London, England was a place where people could publicly air their views on any subject and enjoy the traditional freedom from violent reprisal.Alas, thanks the the intolerance of Islamist thugs this freedom has been cancelled.A female speaker who criticized Islam was stabbed by a standard Muslim low-life religious scumbag.IS THE BLAME FOR THIS DENIAL OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AS SIMPLE AS POINTING THE FINGER AT THE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR OF MURDEROUS MUSLIMS OR IS IT THE RECKLESS ACTIONS OF LIBERAL/PROGRESSIVE POLITICIANS WHO PERMITTED THEIR INFLUX INTO THE UNITED KINGDOM IN THE FIRST PLACE?

US just finished dead last among 46 countries in media trusthttps://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/international/560480-us-finishes-dead-last-in-media-trust-among-46-countries-heres-why%3famp

A GMO, or genetically modified organism, is an animal or plant whose genes have been edited to favour certain physical characteristics, especially for consumption by humans. In this debate, I will be arguing that GMOs should not be banned.I look forward to hearing your opinions. Debate Away!

Hello:When I was in the Navy, I LOVED my ship..  I LOVED being at sea.  I LOVED protecting America.  But, I HATED the Navy.  The Navy was the bureaucracy that ran my ship.I LOVE my country.  I LOVE the Constitution.  I LOVE that our basis for being is freedom.  But, I HATE the government.  The government is the bureaucracy that runs my country..  Am I the only one with this love/hate relationship?excon

Marriage was created at a very first place a scene long before there was a government,organized religion,educational institution,business or ay othrt social institution.There are evidences of marriage since god’s time.talk about lord ram and sita, lord shiva and parvatiLord Vishnu and laxmi ,bible itself boldly and explicitly declares the value of marriage.Since the institution of marriage was created by god and matters so much to him it ought to matter equally to us.What do u want to do?We all want companionship.You want somebody on whom u can rely,in whom u can find security ,in whom u can sense support.Yes, we cant live alone, we are living a lofe with conflicts & troubles .you need somebody to talk, your partner is there in the middle of night when your worries arekeeping u up.Some single people say things along the lines of” I don’t need marriagefor companionship”