Typeonecivil's Debates: [clear]
All Debates
You are browsing through all debates. You can refine the results by using the drop-down boxes above. You can view more information about each debate by clicking Show Details at right.
Winning Position: Scientific inquiry: nanotechnology
23
Scientific inquiry: nanotechnology
When observing several particular scientific papers related to nanotechnological algorithmic induced approaches wherein this code is--in accordance with Ido Bachelet and his teams'--shaped into the dna structure itself by which it, upon being injected into the bloodstream can influence molecules and turn on or off certain cells such as white or red blood cells as well as cancerous cells through the nanobot itself; cancerous cells can also be destroyed and this can be observed in teo specific papers: one that worked to obstruct and destroy cancer cells in a cockroach and another in a leukemia patient with terminal cancer with methods that include origami computing, molecular coding as well as protein distribution. I am quite curious what the thoughts of those who choose to the room are and what you all think that this means for cancer itself and for future scientific endeavors. How can we as thinkers--in a manner of dialogue--better understand what the many outcomes of the advancement of biotechnology, nanotechnology, medicine are and what our civilization may become in such advances? Thank you for reading, everyone. I will provide all sources below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012984https://nano.biu.ac.il/publicationshttps://foresight.org/swarms-of-dna-nanorobots-execute-complex-tasks-in-living-animalhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC451387/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-09105-4https://www.jove.com/video/50268/designing-a-bio-responsive-robot-from-dna-origami
Winning Position: Scientific inquiry
Greetings everyone, my name is typeone or simply type. I would like--in the most efficient way--to attempt to dialogue with all of you about all subjects or whatever you would like to discuss in a way that aids in helping each of us understand more about such subjects; in order to build instead of tear apart, that we can attempt to gather pieces of inquiry together to understand what we do not know instead of working against one another. I invite each and every one of you to join me in scientific dialogue. I would very much like to meet you all. Perhaps a cup of herbal tea or kombucha for us to relax and discuss. It is up to you, the users in the end. A very interesting question, as scientists and thinkers, we are always eager to question as observed from even our infant years before environmental and conditional factors arise. What are the means and understanding as well as the methods of knowing how to impliment scientific dialogue? Once implimentation occurs and conditionality is rearranged, what are the possible outcomes of a group that undergoes this change in relatedness to co-operation rather than competition? What do you guys think? What are your thoughts?