CreateDebate


ARMYANT's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of ARMYANT's arguments, looking across every debate.
2 points

Not arrested but rather escorted back to their parent or legal guardian whom should have a good reason to let their child roam the streets at night or should be equally upset at the child for sneaking out. If the parent shows a pattern of neglect a social worker should be assigned but if the child shows a lack of respect the parent should consider asking for help with alternative disciplining for the child.

2 points

I think we should start with politicians convicted of crimes; they should be publicly beaten for betrayal of the public, abuse of power and authority entrusted to them. In Singapore they cane people convicted of crimes and as a result there is much more respect for law and order. I say strike one leads to an ass whooping for politicians, prosecutors, judges, those who hold high positions in public service and police officers. Everyone else will be subject to an ass whooping after 3 strikes (misdemeanor) or on the first strike for felony & certain misdemeanor convictions.

2 points

PBS is home to many hugely popular and financially successful shows including Sesame Street. Sesame street as a franchise is capable of covering it's production costs without taxpayer subsidies. Think of all the money PBS makes from the sale of merchandise; there is no good reason to think the show would suffer without taxpayer assistance. Conversely since the show was initially started with public tax dollars and a portion of its funding every year comes from taxes shouldn't the government have received its fair share of profits every year? The president of PBS makes over $600,000.00 per year so in summation I think PBS can sustain itself without the governments help.

1 point

In my idea of a perfect society you would be punished for even considering giving those savages a second chance. I'd put you in a cage with them for a month and see what you think then. You _ucking derelict fag!

1 point

I think our justice system is much to lenient in regards to punishment of scum who injure, molest and murder children. I don't think there should be any mercy or compassion for those demons, hanging would even be to good of a death. It's befuddling that there are attorneys capable of defending these monsters or advocates who lobby for their fair and humane treatment. I understand that some religious types believe in mercy for all but in these circumstances they should step aside and allow these savages to be punished by men who don't concern themselves with compassion; only justice and revenge.

1 point

So you're saying that women should not be allowed to abort fetuses as a form of birth control?

1 point

On the one hand I think it would only be fair for men to have the "choice" just like women get a "choice"; that would be true equality. But in reality there would be a lot more bastard children running around if "all things were equal", I'm more concerned with what's fair for the child not the irresponsible parents. Women currently get to make poor choices, sleep around and if they accidentally get pregnant they can have an abortion, that is unless they are "in love" with the man and they can use the baby to control him or unless the man has a bright future and they decide to keep the child for the economic windfall. I don't think men should behave like women though, we should set the example, not stoop to their level. I keep hearing about the male birth control pill yet for years it has been stalled by FDA approval with no reason for the delay given to the public. If this were a "woman's rights" issue it would receive expedited approval. In reality the extremist feminists probably consider this wonder drug as the most powerful tool in the war against women because it takes the sting out of the only real power god gave them, their vaginas.

1 point

Of course illegal aliens are an economic burden to America. They strain the budgets of our law enforcement agencies, crowd our schools (more cost to the taxpayer, less opportunity for our children), take American jobs, most don't pay taxes, they crowd our neighborhoods, commit auto insurance fraud (which drives up the price for everyone else), use emergency rooms as their primary care (with no intention of paying the bill). Deport them all in 2013 vote for anyone but Obama!!

1 point

An illegal alien who first disrespect's our country by illegally crossing the border or overstaying a visa and then continues to violate the law by driving without a license (probably also committed insurance fraud & ID theft / forgery) or worse driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs should be immediately deported. Governor Andrew Cuomo has rightfully proposed new legislation to institute a lifetime ban on anyone convicted of numerous DUI's within a 25 year period from ever obtaining a license in NY. I always hear the argument that illegal aliens are good people who just want a better life; if you want citizens to buy that load of garbage you at least have to impose a zero tolerance rule for the illegals who show they don't care about anything or anyone by driving under the influence.

2 points

Yes men should get at least one week off. When my son was born his mother needed time to recover so I had to stay home for about 10 days to care for them. Your employee won't be of much use to you when his thoughts are only concerned with the well being of his family. If you do the right thing by your employees they will appreciate it by working harder for the company.

1 point

Yes we should send them AIDS, lol (the disease)

No I don't think we should send them aid, they are our enemy. If they have money to launch test missiles and run a nuclear program than they should have enough money to provide disaster relief to their citizens.

1 point

LMFAO, I entirely agree and that argument was hilarious!! Well done Sir!! (In my best Chester the Cheetah impression)

2 points

Hypothetically, if under the premise that society did not encourage people to have morals:

If you were a virgin (hold your laughter please), would you be ashamed to admit that fact to family, close friends or your potential spouse?

Conversely, would you be ashamed to admit that you were sexually promiscuous to that same group of peers?

People naturally have a moral compass, it's obvious that if society holds people to a certain standard it's because there is general consensus that it is the right way to behave. It's easy and usually indulgent to act immorally when no one will find out or when there are no adverse consequences but if your immorality were to become public or the consequences were certain people would not act immorally less they truly lacked a conscience or self control.

Your potential spouse would not appreciate knowing that you got gang banged by the football team as the image would likely haunt him. Your character would constantly be in question, his trust and respect for you would be greatly diminished. And that goes both ways, a woman would experience equal discomfort if she were to learn her husband was a man whore.

1 point

There's no shame in it, most people (in western society) don't wait until marriage. If a bride wears white on her wedding day when she's not a virgin everyone (especially the groom) will think "shenanigans", lol.

I'm sure if there was a similar tradition for the groom he would display his loss of virginity without issue (it would almost be a badge of honor, lol). Only women have a problem with it; many like to be viewed as perfect little Angels even when the complete opposite is true.

0 points

President Barack Obama: President Obama makes Judicial Watch’s “Ten Most Wanted” list for a fifth consecutive year. (The former Illinois Senator was also a “Dishonorable Mention” in 2006.) And when it comes to Obama corruption, it may not get any bigger than Solyndra. Solyndra was once known as the poster child for the Obama administration’s massive “green energy” initiative, but it has become the poster child for the corruption that ensues when the government meddles in the private sector. Solyndra filed for bankruptcy in September 2011, leaving 1,100 workers without jobs and the American taxpayers on the hook for $535 million thanks to an Obama administration stimulus loan guarantee.

Despite the Obama administration’s reticence to release details regarding this scandal, much is known about this shady deal. White House officials warned the president that the Department of Energy’s loan guarantee program was “dangerously short on due diligence,” nonetheless the Obama administration rushed the Solyndra loan through the approval process so it could make a splash at a press event. The company’s main financial backer was a major Obama campaign donor named George Kaiser. While the White House said Kaiser never discussed the loan with White House officials, the evidence suggests this is a lie. And, further demonstrating the political nature of the Obama administration’s activities, the Energy Department pressured Solyndra to delay an announcement on layoffs until after the 2010 elections. Despite the public outrage at this scandalous waste of precious tax dollars, President Obama continues to defend the indefensible and has refused to sack anyone over the Solyndra mess.

President Obama continues to countenance actions by his appointees that undermine the rule of law and constitutional government:

Despite a ban on funding that Obama signed into law, his administration continues to fund the corrupt and allegedly defunct “community” organization ACORN. In July 2011 Judicial Watch uncovered a $79,819 grant to AHCOA (Affordable Housing Centers of America), the renamed ACORN Housing which has a long history of corrupt activity. In absolute violation of the funding ban, Judicial Watch has since confirmed that the Obama administration has funneled $730,000 to the ACORN network, a group that has a long personal history with President Obama.In 2011, JW released a special report entitled “The Rebranding of ACORN,” which details how the ACORN network is alive and well and well-placed to undermine the integrity of the 2012 elections – evidently with the assistance of the Obama administration.

Barack Obama apparently believes it is his “prerogative” to ignore the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law when it comes to appointing czars. According to Politico: “President Barack Obama is planning to ignore language in the 2011 spending package that would ban several top White House advisory posts. Obama said this ban on “czars” would undermine “the President’s ability to exercise his constitutional responsibilities and take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” In other words, Barack Obama believes he must ignore the U.S. Constitution to protect the U.S. Constitution. Many Obama administration czars have not been subject to confirmation by the U.S. Senate as required by the U.S. Constitution. In 2011, JW released a first-of-its-kind comprehensive report on the Obama czar scandal, entitled “President Obama’s Czars.”

In an historic victory for Judicial Watch and an embarrassing defeat for the Obama White House, a federal court ruled on August 17, 2011 that Secret Service White House visitor logs are agency records that are subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell issued the decision in Judicial Watch v. Secret Service. The Obama administration now will have to release all records of all visitors to the White House – or explain why White House visits should be kept secret under the law. The Obama White House continues to fight full disclosure and has stalled the release of records by appealing the lower court decision.(Judicial Watch gave Obama a “failing grade” on transparency in testimony before Congress in 2011. (Read the testimony in full as well as additional congressional testimony during a hearing entitled “White House Transparency, Visitor Logs and Lobbyists.”))

In 2011, the Obama National Labor Relations Board sought to prevent the Seattle-based Boeing Company from opening a $750 million non-union assembly line in North Charleston, South Carolina, to manufacture its Dreamliner plane. Judicial Watch obtained documents from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) showing this lawsuit was politically motivated. Judicial Watch uncovered documents showing NLRB staff cheerleading for Big Labor, mouthing Marxist, anti-American slurs and showing contempt for Congress related to the agency’s lawsuit against Boeing, including email correspondence attacking members of Congress. And it starts at the top. Obama bypassed Congress and recess-appointed Craig Becker, who is connected to the AFL-CIO, the SEIU and ACORN, to the NRLB.

Obama’s corrupt Chicago dealings continued to haunt him in 2011.Obama’s real estate partner, campaign fundraiser and Obama pork recipient Antoin “Tony” Rezko was finally sentenced to jail this year as was former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, who is now set to serve 14 years for attempting to sell Obama’s former Senate seat to the highest bidder. The FBI continues to withhold from Judicial Watch documents of its historic interview of then-Senator Obama about the Illinois corruption scandal. The FBI interview was conducted in December, 2008, about one month before Obama was sworn into the presidency.

1 point

No, I would not be happy with a Muslim President. I voted for Obama thinking it was only right that someone other than an "old white guy" had an opportunity to lead the nation; I now realize that was a terrible mistake. Regardless of what color the President is he should be a real American, with moderate conservative values. Let's face it Obama is not and neither are most Muslims. I personally don't want the US to transform into the Republic of Wadiya so I won't vote for Admiral General Aladeen, lol.

1 point

I would use any means necessary to kill, escape and evade the kidnappers / abductors/ terrorist etc. I can't say with certainty that I would sacrifice myself for the other hostages; it would depend on the value their collective or individual lives had to me.

1 point

Not at all, the "monarchs" are so greedy and corrupt that even in a time of modern civilization they still trick people into accepting their "divine" right to have control over their subjects. If the people ever revolt against the collective tryrannical governments, they should ban all forms of nepotism in politics and specifically ban anyone who is a descendant or relative of the "historical powers" from holding any form of office.

2 points

As President and Commander in Chief of the USA Obama is ultimately responsible for the major increase in national debt, crumbling economy, high unemployment, inflation and devaluation of the dollar. Any reasonable person would agree that if the economy were to have changed course and flourished, unemployment numbers lowered and the dollar was strengthened President Obama would SURELY accept credit for being directly responsible; if he can accept credit for positive momentum then he MUST own the fact that he is ultimately responsible for not even a stagnant but rapidly deteriorating economy. If he keeps allowing Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to print money and artificially "stimulate" the economy by moving forward with the third failed attempt at "quantitative easing" this country will be the next Greece. NWO is in full effect but our citizens dont want to open their eyes to that reality. The democrats have fooled the so called "minorities" into blindly voting democrat on every issue and for every candidate without truly understanding the consequences. They have used the "minorities" innate tribalism to trick them into believing ALL democratic principles are in their best interests. Last time I checked most major metroplitan cities are thoroughly controlled by democratic politicians; if dems were for the "minority" why do those democratic mayors allow the police force to harass predominantly minority neighborhoods, the jails are filled with 80% minorities, minorities have less job opportunity etc... They are right on time with the welfare checks and section 8 though... the democrats want to keep you down, Republicans want to help Americans to help themselves!!

1 point

Those people are insane! Anyone who thinks that even remotely resembles good judgement should have their head examined.

1 point

Posessing a gun doesn't make someone commit a criminal act. People own hammers but you don't see most people smashing each others heads in with them. Crime is driven by other factors (gangs, money / greed, drugs, poverty, lack of morals, psychopathy, revenge) a gun can be used to committ a crime but it can also be used to prevent or stop a crime.

2 points

David I agree on all fronts. Now men have another option to prevent impregnating the run of the mill promiscuous woman so the gene pool should improve over time as a result. Maybe abortion won't be such a huge debate in America anymore. Feminists must secretly hate this invention since it empowers men and has the potential to take some of the control away from women (what little they have anyway).

2 points

Elevators are awesome!

^^^This guy is an Elevator Mechanic

1 point

Kill anyone convicted of hurting children, violent rape, mass murder and treason.


1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]