You: "You have no proof!"
Me: I have proof! Look at this article:
You're someone who attacks others
yes
and then pretends to be the victim when he gets called out.
YOU were the one who got called out. I called you out on your hypocrisy. I was the one who said that you openly admitted to writing snarky replies, which you DID NOT DENY! You in fact AGREED WITH ME that you write snarky replies. Seriously?
In other words: you're an idiot.
If you can use ad hominems, so can I. You are a .
Because I reported all your posts which include swearing and you have not been banned, nor have those posts been taken down. It frustrates me.
Besides, your swearing is often implicated in insults, while the swearing of others is often to prove a point. I'd let the latter slide. But really both are worthy of a ban.
Finally, the OP of this debate mentioned you specifically.
To be fair, I do agree that plenty of other members, including the creator of this debate, do swear a lot on this site. However, in the pinned post called 'Keep Calm and Follow The Rules' it does say that swearing is not allowed, and that you will be banned if you do it.
I did call you out for it a few times, and yet you continue to do it.
I am not an alt account. You have no proof for your claim.
I like your trance music more than I like your debating tactics by a long shot.
And the one who just so happened to create the world and everything in it, including you.
And you have no evidence for all of this, surely.
What I meant is that just because humans don't know everything, we don't need to fill in the gaps with a God. Because science will eventually answer all our questions.
Maybe, I suppose that I haven't disproved God, but that I have disproved the Christian God.
Call me cynical, but how does that disprove God?
The Bible says: In the beginning there was nothing. Then God created...
Matter cannot be created or destroyed.
You are using the argument from ignorance: "We don't yet understand how everything in the world came to be, so a bearded omnipotent deity must have done it."
We don't have to explain practically everything yet. I use science to make sense of the world, and it doesn't matter that science doesn't know everything, because what science does know is true and holds up to the test of investigation.
There is no evidence for Genesis. There is evidence for the Big Bang. I find it really hard to believe that in the beginning, there was nothing, and then suddenly God appeared, and made some light (even though energy cannot be created or destroyed, and light it a type of energy)... it just doesn't make any sense. And just because it isn't how you picture things doesn't mean it is true.
In my debates, I like to prove that God cannot exist, rather than does not exist. So here is some proof.
1. God violates the laws of physics. Remember in the beginning of most holy books, like the Bible, when God creates the heavens and the earth?
Well, look at this law of physics:
No matter or energy can be created or destroyed.
And there you have it! Proof that God does not exist.
Here's another:
The Bible says that God is omnipotent. Omnipotence is impossible, because in order to be truly omnipotent, God would be able to create a rock so large that even he cannot lift it. But then he is not omnipotent, if he cannot lift the rock. And if he can't create the rock, he is not omnipotent.
I just proved that god does not exist
Paedophilia harms no-one unless it is acted upon.
That's true.
Expecting people not to act on their sexuality though is of course unrealistic.
But now we're back to square one: paedophilia is harmful. This path of reasoning changes nothing.
My point was only that we shouldn't really have opposite attitudes to essentially what is the same issue: abnormal sexual attraction.
I think we can, considering that gayness harms no one, while paedophilia does cause harm to children.