Although it is a person's choice, it should provably wait until 25. This is because a person's brain, specifically their prefrontal cortex, or decision making control center, usually continues to develop until then. Then they would be able to consider all the options and choose if they really want to do something or not.

Living in a controlling and harsh environment actually makes children more subservient and on average less successful than children who lived in a warm and permissive household.

Actually a study done by a male professor showed that women are now scoring over a full IQ point higher than men. Men and women have equally contributed to history, but women are pushed into the background. In addition, much of the stereotypical behavior exhibited by women today are due to the stereotypes themselves that society has forced onto them. Also women are not just the "sack" to hold the child. They provide the egg. Please stop basing your arguments on personal experience.

❤️Brian Greene's writing. Read the Hidden Reality to fully understand the answer.

If you were the father...good luck to you, my good sir, with finding someone who can put up with your demeaning sexist views.

While free speech is a right, you should politely consider other's opinions.

Debate is supposed to be cordial. Anyways, women discovered radioactivity, the structure of DNA (Watson and crick technically stole information), the composition of the sun, abstract algebra, the modern electric refrigerator, wireless communication, CCTVs, and computer programs.

I think that gender is completely irrelevant in elections. Only the qualifications of the candidates should matter, which unfortunately is not the case.

PMS is cause because of hormones. Men hav more testosterone. Matter settled. Moving on, it's actually proven that men candidates with the exact same resume and speech are more attractive to voters than women because of societal sexism. There was an entire TIMES article on it.

Actually, a bigger brain is not indicative of higher intelligence, or elephants would be smarter than us. It's the body's to brain ratio and the number of neurons. For example, Albert Einstein's brain was smaller and lighter than normal. Studies show that teachers, regardless of their own gender, actually favor boys more than girls.

Like being pregnant is fun. I'd argue that men need women for kids, because in the past, men were usually the ones who forced women to bear children.

Although I'm on the same side, that's a kind of useless argument

Actually, guys are encouraged to try new stuff by society. Girls have more guts than guys - they had to do things that were not only unprecedented but also when everyone else was against them. Example - literally all pre-1900s women scientists, diplomats, pirates, etc.

Yes. People vote for men because they are sexistly predisposed to. Look up some studies on it. It's quite interesting and also enraging at the same time.

Well, according to you, girls are stupid and their arguments are invalid. Following that logic, you, as a girl, are therefore idiotic and your arguments that boys rule are also invalid. Beaten at your own game.

Besides the biological ones (by the way, in nature, females take care of the children), it's sort of sexist to relegate roles to each gender, and it limits them to what they can do.

This truely makes me wonder if I've somehow time traveled back to the 1800s

Admittedly, this is a convoluted question with many answer. Personally, I believe that it depends on the student. As we are all a mosaic of female and male characteristics, some may fit better in single gender schools than others. However, the pros and cons are the same for the average student. For one thing, students in single gender schools often have trouble dealing with the opposite gender after graduating. In addition, the absence of an entire gender can lead to a lack of perspective in the classroom. On the other hand, some studies show that because girls and boys can have different learning needs, they benefit from single gender schools, especially girls, who are often disadvantaged in coed schools. For example, 20% more girls in single gender schools chose STEM majors than those in coed.

Notice that many girls use facts to make their case. Most of the boys on the other side use sheer experience and hubris. They arrogantly phrase their arguments to sound condescending. In addition, the few statistics they use are outdated.

So you regard girls as stupid and laughable? Pray tell how you expect to ever attract a girl, or even if you don't want to have a girlfriend, how you plan to be friends with girls or even get along with you mother.

Actually, once sperm is artificially reproduced, we won't need men. Howeve, artificial wombs cannot replace the need for women any time soon.

Did you notice what you said? You said men, but didn't say women in the same sentence as their counterparts. This is actually very common, and it shows that you subconsciously think that men are more grown up than women. Again, small sexist acts.

Actually, teachers, regardless of whether they male or female, have been shown in studies to favor male students over female ones. Likewise, parents, even mothers, are more likely to search whether their son is gifted than whether their daughter is gifted, even if the two children are equally matched. In fact, in many regions of the world, women want sons more than they want a girl. This proves that not all females favor their gender more than the male gender, as our dear friend 123456789101 has shown us, usually because they have been sadly conditioned to think that they are worthless.

100% agreement. One caveat: although women and men are definitely equal, it is also definitely unfair that men get considerably more opportunities and attention than women.