- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
I don't like Trump.
Disparate outcomes have various, articulable causes. Systemic Racism is one of those causes only when the specifics of that racism can be articulated. It almost never can. Disparate outcomes are not sufficient evidence when those outcomes have so many other actual causes.
The Nazis were run by Hitler under a singular hierarchy. Police Departments are controlled by their city leadership. They have individual policies. Police are officers of the state in which they reside.
If you want to assert that something is the case, you have to provide evidence for your case. It cannot be assumed that the policies of the Baltimore PD have any impact on the actions of an officer with the Minneapolis PD. Not without evidence.
If you insist that a connection must be assumed unless there is evidence to the contrary, then you must also prove that you aren't secretly molesting puppies, which can be assumed.
It's not immaterial to the charges in question.
I agree that the bigger issue is the perception of racism. That's what's led to the national catastrophe. But if there are a series of racially charged occurrences, like this one, with a lack of evidence of racism, like this one, then you will have a mass perception that is incorrect.
Nationwide studies that account for crime rates and types do not support the racist cop narrative. Yet that narrative is perpetuated by people with strong a belief in perceived racism.
I'll quote the headlights of your source. "Racist Police Practices Are Endemic in Baltimore".
Not only have you not shown how the officer was racially motivated, but you failed to show how his department is racist. You've failed to show that they have racist policies and practices. You've failed to show anything except for an article about a city a thousand miles away. A city with different policies and practices. Your best explanation is that they wear the same color clothing.
On the other hand, you also said that individual racism need not be precent for endemic racism to exist. Which essentially concedes the fact that nothing indicates racial motivation of the killer beyond his race and that of his victim.
Furthermore, when you see disparate outcomes between races, you have to find racist causes for it to actually be racist. Just saying "it's institutional", is not an explanation. It's not accurate. And it doesn't help. All it does it make ignorant people want to burn shit.
It wouldn't be the same action, obviously. But your reasoning is fundementally the same. It's not unique to Nazis. Commies had it for the Bourgeoisie, KKK has it for Blacks, and BLM has it for cops. It's called Collectivist thinking and you have a bad case of it.
Those two cities are 1100 miles apart. But if Democrats tend to have racist city policies, then their may be a commonality of racism between Baltimore and Minneapolis.
Even so, unless you demonstrate that a study of Baltimore provides the cause of an individual's action in Minneapolis, your just blowing smoke. You might as well say that a black guy mugged you once to justify your white hood and cloak.
Did you know that there are about as many civilians are shot by police each year as there are police arrested by police each year? But there are way more civilians than cops, which means police must be cracking down on cops at sky high rate. Right? That high arrest rate goes along with a higher than average conviction rate. That's some blue line they've got there. And if that cop criminality sounds horrific, consider that cops are arrested at about 1.7 per 100,000 while the general population is arrested at about 3,888 per 100,000
Air traffic controllers who already weren't working!
I said a few, and you said three. What does a few look like to you? There are close to a million cops in the country. When they victimize people, it's an outrage that goes viral. That's because it's rare.
Hey, if every Jewish business I ever encountered put the screws to me, would you stand by me telling you to go fuck yourself for being one of them? You are making the same logical error that fueled the holocaust. The same error that perpetuates racism. YOU are making that error, so stop it.
Firing everyone who refuses to work isn't the same as firing everyone of a given profession. The resemblance is in your elimination of an entire category of people based on the actions of a few. It is completely irrational to fire Joe Cop in Colorado because Officer Murderer killed a man in Minnesota.
It's the same kind of irrationality that has some folks saying "I got mugged by a black guy so I hate black guys" or "I got racially profiled by an asian clerk so I hate Asians" or "I specifically seek Youtube videos of cops appearing to act incorrectly so I hate cops". It's all the same logical fallacy that lies at the root of racism. Stop committing that fallacy.
There should be a few questions for the City Government as well. The following is from the Minneapolis PD Use of Force Policy 5-311:
Neck Restraint: Non-deadly force option. Defined as compressing one or both sides of a person’s neck with an arm or leg, without applying direct pressure to the trachea or airway (front of the neck). Only sworn employees who have received training from the MPD Training Unit are authorized to use neck restraints. The MPD authorizes two types of neck restraints: Conscious Neck Restraint and Unconscious Neck Restraint. (04/16/12)
Your solution of firing them all resembles a final solution I once heard about. You can't punish this individual for the actions of that individual. That's how we get racism, anti-Semitism, and all the other forms of collectivist bigotry. That's how we get so divided that cities burn. An actual start to an actual solution would be for you to stop being part of the problem.