Actually, you pretend the cure for guns is more guns
Actually it's teaching objective morality and objective meaning. People without those beliefs have no conscience, programmed through those concepts to stop them from killing if they snap. That's why there were no school gun deaths when Christianity was fully accepted by the population.
because you're a noxious cretin and the only thing you give a literal fuck about is profit.
Nonsensical argument from the mind of the person who created the zoo debate that he could not win.
Why? Because he most likely makes no profit off of guns.
how much more difficult it is to kill someone with your hands than it is to kill them with a weapon specifically designed for killing?
Difficulty is meaningless to someone pissed enough to kill you.
Guns have equalized things, so that someone cannot kill you just because they are bigger and tougher. Your concept neuters peoples' ability to equally defend themselves in a confrontation. It even enables bullies because they know you can't stop them weaponless.
Cool. And when you take the tanks, they kill with guns. Hence, let's give everybody a tank, right?
Nobody has tanks, and they can't be built by plebs due to complexity. Hillbillies create guns in a garage due to lack of complexity. Your logic is shit.
Because American courts are not filled with objective arbitrators but with left wing activists, many appointed by Obama. It's why they are obstructing Trump's appointments at all costs. They like governing from the bench more than governing from the government.
They could be living in the West today, free, or they could still be in Africa as slaves.
Slavery has historically been widespread in Africa, and still continues today in some countries.
And you want to know why "bongos" are finding things difficult in the present?
Sure do. My grandmother was kept in a Japanese internment camp in the 1940s. What does that mean? It means I wasn't put in a camp but someone I never met was. And that was just 70 years ago. Not 154 years ago.
From now on, if you want to accuse a country of being a "communist failure" then you must first prove it was Communist, because
The people in power trying to advocate for Communism don't believe in any of your idealist views. You support them anyway for the provably failed version.
