CreateDebate


Apolline's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Apolline's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

right wingers love when people are offended...other than christians and right wingers

We have no problem offending left wing Christians. I do it daily.

4 points

Socialism is meritocratic, capitalism is crap

Your only problem being that those in power preaching socialism, never have any intention of allowing it to be meritocratic.

1 point

If china is communist, the US must be super communist

Except that China is overwhelmingly Atheist and worships Marx, while the U.S. is the exact opposite.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2178724/china-produces-karl-marx-cartoon-series- mark-200th-anniversary

1 point

Lib Congressman

https://youtu.be/D7VVVsGRvuc

Lib talk show hosts

https://youtu.be/q1Xl3cpKIM

Conservative Congressman

https://youtu.be/2XMEkqkRZm0

Conservative Congressman and talk show hosts

https://youtu.be/DTw0lNHOnWw

Any questions?

1 point

Blacks and Hispanics are much more religious statistically than whites.

http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/racial-and-ethnic-composition/

Good luck attacking Christianity lib.

1 point

Trump is NUTS! You KNOW that, right?

You should see the list of Democrat wackjobs putting their name in to run for President against Trump.

1 point

That time CNN admitted Collusion story was fake that libs pretend didn't happen

http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ That timeCNNadmittedCollusionstorywasfakethatlibspretenddidnt_happen

Fusion GPS used a Glenn Simpson story from 2007 to invent the Trump Russia collusion story for the Clinton campain.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB117674837248471543

https://bwi.forums.rivals.com /threads/report-russia-‘dossier’-based-on-10-year-old-wall-street-journal-articles.196051/

1 point

Most Christians are black or brown. Let's check the lib oppression rule book. Yep. You're a racist bigot.

1 point

You forgot freedom of speech that libs use violence to suppress.

1 point

There's no economic freedom when all the land and resources are already owned

Then why do people who start out with nothing continue to purchase both? Because there's cheap land all over America.

Most land by far isn't owned by people in the 1%. If the 1% all died tomorrow, you'd obtain no more land or resources. It would just become harder to find a decent job.

2 points

Nancy STARTED the State of the Union fight with Trump, and WON it..

And? He could go on tv tomorrow and speak for an hour if he wanted.

2 points

If Trump needs $20 billion for the wall, why not ask for all of it NOW?

Because if Democrats refuse to give you $5 billion, they won't give you $20 billion.

1 point

I would take that deal. Libs in power don't care about either in reality. It's about playing political games.

1 point

Republicans tried to pass a bill to go ahead and pay them during the shutdown. Democrats voted no.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/10-dems-break-with-leaders-support-gop-bill-to-pay-workers-during-the-shutdown? amp=true

Obviously libs are more worried about politics than checks.

1 point

The country is ruled by hereditary feudal lords, it's not about whether bringing them down makes me wealthier or not.

As opposed to what? Less feudal lords?

Oprah and Michael Jordan are "feudal lords"? Jesus Fucking Christ.

A few isn't "most".

Most people aren't Darth Sidious, so I guess he isn't a problem.

Darth Sidious is a fictional character roaming around in a fictional death star. He doesn't even exist.

1 point

Believe it or not, no matter how hard top billionaires like Carlos Slim, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates work, and no matter how much money they rake in, they will never be considered as equals by the old rich families that have been wealthy for centuries.

Why would I or Bill Gates give a fuck about their approval? What, are you 12?

These families view themselves as a class of their own, made up of only a few select few

Liberals view themselves as an elite class. So what? You want to take down Soros? Go ahead. Make my fucking day. Speaking of useless billionaires who didn't invent or innovate anything and see themselves as a demi god, and then passed down their wealth to their goblin son.

1 point

Then why are the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and others still the wealthiest people on earth after 200 years of capitalism?

Because some wealth is obtained by people who pass it down. If they went broke tomorrow, you wouldn't suddenly get richer.

A few isn't "most", and even if it were, you still live like a king because of the innovations of a bunch of fairly wealthy entrepeneurs who got rich through innovation.

1 point

If government is the problem

And you argued with your other puppet, it was the right who wanted omnipotent government. How ironic.

1 point

For god's sake

Freudian slip?

stop making me block your puppet accounts

You choose to block puppet accounts while having:

List of Nom dupe accounts

ColonelFry

BurritoLunch

Carterusmbot

TheCreator

BobBarker

Hootie

Impirum

YousifDuck1

Quantumhead

Rusticus

ArchonElite

ChiefToad

NumberNine

NumberFive

KyloRen

Warjin

TheSnake

Ramshutu

Sv3rige

Nomenclature

NumberOne

TheDevil

TheNotorious

Ctrlaltdel

Justicebaker

Justignoreme

Dreadnought

JoeTheJew

JoeBloggs

Rothschild

Mrcatsam

borisdecker 

TheNotorious

Deathwolf666

Jamesbody

AlMualim

grapesNcrepe

HyperComm5

Waylife

Freyr

AveSatanas

Factfanx

Funtits

Waylife

Saggyballs

Iameerah

Spartacus

Kalamazoo

ModusPonem

Rogerfederer

Gruffalo

Lizarrd

ChiefToad

WormNugget

Winterhold

Misery

JoseAquacate

1 point

Cool. I notice you haven't denied trafficking children for sex.

He probably felt no need to define a term that has a definition.

Make a note to yourself. When someone accuses you of being an international paedophile, insisting that they live in their "mom's basement" is not an adequate comeback

It is when the accusation is false and the comeback is true. There probably are no points left on your man card.

1 point

Lol. I've explained this to you already. You don't win arguments by being wrong.

Correct. Hence you are 0 for 10,000 in debates, and are about 0 for 1,000 verses Amarel alone.

1 point

That's the reality capitalism has constructed

It's been that way for 10,000 years. If you destroyed their ability to make money, innovation would cease, and you'd be no richer. You'd probably be poorer because you couldn't find any more funds to take from them. This is what is meant by "at some point you run out of other peoples' money".

which prevents the vast majority of people from reaching their full potential

Back to the full potential, but you can't tell me, the potential for what. Wealth? Status? Pfffft.

while placing privileged prats who are not special on a pedestal because their daddy was rich.

Oprah Winfrey was born into poverty. She's the richest woman on Earth and has no children to pass it to. Mark Zuckerburg created facebook from his dorm room. Most mega rich people had to innovate or create something that society wanted or needed. They also had to have the ambition to pursue it. Without their innovations, you'd live in a third world shit box.

1 point

and the left has more billionaires than the right.

Which leftists? You mean the ones that are capitalists and American Democrats?

Yes. The ones Marxists applaud and vote with as a bloc.

The right wants less government control.

no they don't".

I've never met a right winger that wants government control of healthcare or to create more social programs. Never met them. Never happened.

Every left winger I've met does want those things.


2 of 5 Pages: << Prev Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]