Believing in God or money is more akin to believing in Santa Claus, socialism simply entails the belief that society will not be retarded forever.
Number one:
If you add up all the right wing states and left wing states most of the hate groups are in right wing states.
Number two:
The two directly below california are right wing states and they alone have twice as many hate groups as california when you combine them.
Number three:
California has a huge population in general and has more right wingers in it then a lot of other states despite being largely left leaning.
Number four:
Define "hate group".
For humans, this is truer than for the aliens you speak of. The dominant nations are blue-white-red combinations of some sort.
Just because a lot of their flags are red white and blue doesn't mean their politics are.
Depends on if the aliens are smart or stupid. Theoretically, an alien race could have IQs of 48 by human standards.
Not advanced ones. Aliens in general could have any IQ but the kind Mingi is talking about should be way more intelligent than humans.
It’s capitalism when the state owns the means of production huh?
Capitalism is when private owners own the means of production and use them to generate profit. When the state owns the means of production and uses them to generate profit they are doing everything a private owner would do except the private owner is a dictator and not just some guy who owns a business.
You could argue against capitalism better if you knew what it was.
I am the one who has been trying to get you imbeciles to understand the definitions of the words you use for months, and now you pretend like I'm the one who doesn't know my definitions? You are the one who insists that socialism is synonymous with state control, so even if I were to say "capitalism is when poodles fart into bags and then the gas is released down the workers throats at the condom factory" I would still be providing more accurate definitions than you.
The fact of the matter is you are a revisionist cunt who doesn't know a thing, since the very conception of the political spectrum during the french revolution left has meant "equal rights and opportunities" and right has meant "traditional values and aristocracy". Now you idiots are espousing the alternate reality which claims that left means "government control" and right means "freedom".
Feminine energy thinks in emotion
Energy does not have a gender you retard.
And anti-capitalist
Fascism is very capitalist, it's just that the state owns the means of production rather than your Jewish uncle.
Because those fascists I quote say the exact same things you do and agree with you on everything.
But that is the opposite of the truth and fascists are liars who hijack rhetoric they don't believe in to get into power and then don't do what they say they will.
So you can't PROVE your claims on a debate site?.
Look at his waterfall, he does it every 5 minutes.
She doesn't have a pussy, she is female for HER species.
But she is the only one of her species. Why would there be a female and no male?
She is definitely colourless and intangible in all ways physical.
Then how can she be female? The fact that you think a quantum computer can have a pussy is nonsensical.
she is the one who runs the regime of those laws except for the chaos (entropy) which is superior even to her.
Is the black actually fate? Or is it more like a bug in the soft ware?
I'm an Alpha male.
You're an ugly fat fascist Jew who is despised by his own kids and got cucked by his wife because he couldn't get it up.
A condition of absolute power to the ruling class would be fascism. (see Mussolini)
Bronto cannot be reasoned with, he believes Mussolini was a communist.
Sure some of them are brave and selfless, others kill civilians on purpose. Stop sucking the military's dick.
You're appaulin' me
with your policy
of dishonesty,
Bronto's probably
on at least
three different narcotics, he
constantly
tries to cause a scene,
and make a mockery
of Nom but he's
not the one quoting fascists un-ironically
but here's a newsflash you rotten piece
of shit, when fascists are trying to get in office they
tend to lie a lot, you see?
they say their fighting for the working class, fighting for democracy
they co-opt the speech
of a leftist, then do the opposite, so stop it, geez
@Amarel
I hope you understand that I really do get your point, yet maintain that FromWithin truly is someone who natural selection would weed out undeniably. First of all natural selection is different for all creatures, because natural selection is nature itself. Nature governs the survival of all things, not just that which is living. That is to say, "nature" ultimately means "everything", and "death" is merely an extension of "entropy". The conditions that influence and shape a human's psyche are all a part of nature, and that is why there is no "human nature" because a human's nature is determined by the nature of their experience, and the more complex the brain of the organism is the more subject to various "natures" they are. Of course there is a finite extent to the "natures" that a human can embody, but not to the extent that one could pinpoint a specific universal "human nature" because many humans are opposite to others in many fundamental ways. But more to the point, what humans do by their very collective nature, through their individual nature without the larger perspective of a coordinated collective nature, (a sub-socialist culture) is argue amongst themselves. All the while the more collectively conscience but less individually conscience ( "Animal" or pre-type zero) cultures spend more time optimizing their survival strategy and less time bickering. That is to say, humans invent many points of contention between other groups of humans within the web of cultural bullshit that humans tend to develop, and FromWithin is someone who is very much a victim of this web of bullshit. In other words his "nature" (conditioning) is that of one who has a very limited perspective, a very narrow and dogmatic worldview, and thus he can only survive in a very specific environment, one which encourages the mentality of a brainwashed fool.
There should be no marriage policy, why should the state have anything to do with who people want to marry?
And why is marriage even a thing?
Humans who are not mentally ill. have an innate morality.
Well I wouldn't call it morality, it's more empathy and a natural desire not to see other beings suffering. Morality is more of an arbitrary thing that can mean whatever a given person, religion or culture wants it to.
Exemplified by how humans no longer stone gay people or adulterers to death for example
Not only is doing that an affront to human empathy but it is also irrational, hating gay people or even believing that people should have monogamous relationships is something you are conditioned to believe and not necessarily something people would even consider without being taught to think about it a certain way.
The people have spoken, HAVE THEY NOT?!
Mingiwuwu is here, to stay.
Nope, there hasn't even been an election yet. I don't think enough people will run to even begin the election at this rate, we are the only ones running. UNLESS you just want to skip right to the final debate and have it just between us.
You be President, and maybe I'll be VP?
There is no VP but you can support him.
Allah is the AntiChrist. Have you not yet worked that out?
That's not a good way to handle people like him. Do you realize he probably thinks Allah is someone different from the christian God? He won't have any idea what you're getting at.
I'm not even in the Socialist Party mate
You don't want to run?
We now have two centrists we're just waiting for at least a couple cons and anyone else who wants to jump in and we can get started.
I could easily debate that USSR maps China
The notion that Communism is responsible for those deaths is a lie. Between the fact that those countries are not even communist, the fact that most of the deaths were due to famine and the fact that the capitalist west lies and fabricates statistics all the time you really have nothing to go on.
Wonder where they'll get the money from
We'll take the money billionaires are using to buy yachts and blow up poor countries.
I found two baby raccoons once, they were separated from their family so I raised them and released them into my neighbors shed. They are still living there.
It might have been a runner but the first thing you do is ban a fellow user for making a quip, that’s socialism for ya
He wasn't going to run and he will just abuse alts anyway, now are you going to run or shall I ban you as well?
Yeah, there’s a 50% chance it’s you. So how will we know?
I won't cheat, that would ruin the point. Every time I use an alt I admit it's me anyway and only use them in case I get banned again.
Can I run as an independent ;)
You're a conservative, you troll liberals and your views are right wing. You don't have to conform to any code of conduct or general set of policies so if you want to be "independent" that's fine but you will be considered part of the conservative party.
Why is it okay for you to do it?
Because I am the chief moderator of the site and a Dark Lord of the Sith.
Cool. But there'd be an objective judge
Objective according to what/who?
Yep, so stop doing those things or I'll have you banned, sued and investigated by the FBI you sick pedophile.
Pssssst...Nom. The last 3 pre-Trump Presidents were world class dickheads.
Nom knows.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewhodoesnotwork,neithershallheeat
He who does not work, neither shall he eat is a New Testament aphorism originally by Paul the Apostle, later cited by John Smith in Jamestown, Virginia, and by LENIN during the Russian Revolution.
Advertising on this site is illegal desist or you may be facing a lawsuit.
saying things without reasoning behind them
The reasoning speaks for itself, our current limitations are your only argument here and our current limitations won't be there in the future given that we progress technologically.
Firstly no, you won't know unless it's you as you have no tracking capacity.
I know an alt when I see one, I've been around the block on CD by now.
Secondly, it entirely comes down to them and their IQ, preferences etc. so it's extremely important to know every single voter and get aggregate data.
It's a purely democratic election, all I have to do is count the votes.
Then I will humiliate you in campaign strategy and leave you in the dirt as you beg to coalition against the Republicans.
Nope. So, are you running?
There's not enough to go around. Enough money, yes. Enough food, water and energy to enjoy life? No. We'd all have to live as shack-living hermits to make communism work.
Not with sufficient technology and methodology.
Who decides the winner? As in, who is the voter-base?
Anyone who wants to vote who is not a candidate themselves. I will know if any alt accounts try to interfere with the democracy and double vote.
Capitalism has existed since the days one could legally call another person...his property. Capital is a word that describes anything private with a knowable value.
I do believe capitalism started in Sumeria as I also believe they had the first written contracts and what we might call, lawyers.
Although I understand your point it is not entirely accurate. Capitalism as an economic system is relatively modern but pieces of capitalism where present in more primitive systems, just as pieces of socialism exist in many capitalist nations and even in systems before capitalism. Sumeria was not capitalist per se but many of the elements of capitalism do date back to sumeria.
Free education is common sense, the quality of the society in which we live depends on the quality of the minds that society is composed of.
True, although one could of course argue that resistance to class oppression has always existed
Definitely, but that doesn't make it socialism obviously. Even feudalism and capitalism were born out of class struggle.
Jesus wasn't even a real person first of all. Second of all he may have more in common with socialists than capitalists but he would have lived in a time before socialism was really a thing.
I saw a clip once of a woman having sex with a tiger on my friend's phone.
I have seen shit like that, some of it I am still trying to unsee.
I assumed it must be fake but who knows? There are plenty of crazy people out there.
There are definitely people who actually do things like that, although most of them don't have such dangerous tastes.
They are also turning "lefter" due to the tendency for humans to evolve culturally rather than remain the same. One could say that it's "human nature" to not have a fixed nature, and thus we strive onward towards progress one step at a time.
Why are you scared to address the debate band retreating to ad hominems?
Because you look like something that crawled out of a fat goblins anus hole and immediately started sexually assaulting small mammals.
