CreateDebate


AstralPlane's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of AstralPlane's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Inches are not what suicides are measured in you fully delusional imbecile.

AstralPlane(34) Clarified
1 point

Absolute codswallop.

The English exported WEALTH, CULTURE, LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION to the FOUR CORNERS OF THE GLOBE. The modern world could and would never have been achieved without the FINE EXPLOITS OF THE GLORIOUS BRITISH EMPIRE.

Quite frankly, you are almost certainly ON DRUGS to be comparing the BENEFITS CULTURE of thieving Irish SAVAGES, who BOMB WOMEN AND CHILDREN for political exposure, with THE MIGHT AND GLORY OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE.

1 point

It's time for you to wake up and FACE THE FACTS.

The Irish are nothing more than a ragtag tribe of VIOLENT SAVAGES, who think political campaigning is best achieved through BOMB ATTACKS, SHOOTINGS, KNEECAPPINGS and other morally reprehensible forms of BARBARISM and VIOLENCE.

1 point

The English are well-known for inventing the modern infrastructure necessary to the smooth functioning of our contemporary society, while the Irish are well-known for thieving it.

1 point

The POTATO-LICKING TINKERS have no place in a civilized society and you damned well know it. Letting the Irish into pubs costs businesses thousands in unnecessary funds given that they have to nail everything to the floor to stop it being thieved.

1 point

Amarel, you are just such a pathetic person. You're a lying troll who asks me questions you know I can't answer because immediately before asking them, you ban me from your threads. It's insincere and demonstrates very clearly the childlike behaviour you exhibit when you lose an argument.

South Korea is the best example of a "wealthy nation" you can find, huh?

Let's talk about how, out of the 195 countries on Earth, the United States has the 23rd highest suicide rate. Let's talk about how any of the countries above them could possibly be considered wealthy, which is what you appear to be implying. Those countries are:-

1) Lesotho.

2) Guyana.

3) Eswatini.

4) South Korea.

5) Kiribati.

6) Micronesia.

7) Lithuania.

8) Suriname.

9) Russia.

10) South Africa.

11) Ukraine.

12) Belarus.

13) Uruguay.

14) Montenegro.

15) Latvia.

16) Slovenia.

17) Belgium.

18) Vanuatu.

19) Mongolia.

20) Kazakhstan.

21) Hungary.

22) Croatia.

1 point

Familiarity reduces irrational fear. You should go to a gun range.

Education reduces stupidity. You should go to school.

1 point

LOL!

But it's not up to you!

Neither was the Holocaust. But I'd have put a stop to that, too.

1 point

You saying that handing my kid a gun under controlled circumstances is a "bad idea"

I'm saying you literally should be sent to jail for doing that.

1 point

I should've written a book with the time and words I've wasted on this ignorant cocksucker

Listen up, you semi-retarded ginger fool. Thinking it unsafe to put lethal weapons in the hands of four year old children does not make me an "ignorant cocksucker". You are a dangerously stupid idiot.

1 point

If you did it that would be true.

Whoever gives the gun to the four year old has no impact on how stupid an idea it is.

You are just honestly ridiculous, Amarel. There is something quite wrong with the way your mind works.

1 point

If a person is suicidal, a gun increases their chances of follow through. The vast majority of people are not suicidal

I'm not going round in circles with you, pal. The figures are perfectly clear. The US has the highest suicide rate of any wealthy nation, the laxest gun laws, and over half of all its suicides are via firearm. You can choose to believe that's all a big coincidence if you like.

1 point

Lol you compare firearms safety education to sprinkling anthrax on cereal.

Allowing a four year old to handle a gun is the precise opposite of "safety". Stop being fucking ridiculous, Amarel.

1 point

What affect does the presence of a gun have on someone's conscientious decision to kill themselves?

I think you probably mean conscious, not conscientious.

A gun offers a very quick, highly effective and relatively painless method of ending a person's life. Hence, the ease by which suicide can be successfully achieved, in at least some instances, influences a person's decision about whether or not it is the most preferable option. This is especially true if that person is emotional and has a gun immediately at hand. Without the gun, the same individual might have to first go through a meticulous preparation process, during which time they have the opportunity to calm down and think more rationally.

AstralPlane(34) Clarified
1 point

The terrifying thing is that a person with his ideas and mentality being elected president of the US is not completely unfeasible.

1 point

The technical term for your condition is hoplophobia. You have an irrational fear of weapons.

The technical term for your condition is stupidity. You are presented with cold logic but purposefully misrepresent it as fear.

1 point

you're intentionally retarded when it comes to any understanding of firearms

Sure buddy. Thinking it's a bad idea to give guns to a four year old is "intentionally retarded".

I've a counter theory. I think you are wrong in the head.

1 point

The likelihood of the event absolutely has to do with how many people have an event occur vs how many do not.

Suicides do not "occur", you idiot. They are conscious actions undertaken by people. They are not random events and so the likelihood of one person taking their own life has absolutely nothing to do with the experiences of someone else. Equally, the likelihood of me choosing to eat Italian food instead of Chinese food tonight has nothing to do with the experiences of someone else.

You are literally an idiot, Amarel. You do not have the faintest understanding of statistical probability.

0 points

Africans are not Asians. Two total different continents.

Oh wow. You are certainly a well-learned scholar to be aware of this little known fact. Only three percent of Americans know this, so you are clearly part of an intellectual elite.

"Do you realize Egypt is in Africa?"

Well, I'll be darned. You're absolutely right!!! There was me thinking it was in Massachusetts.

0 points

Correct Norwich. China developed gunpowder mainly for fireworks not for weapons until it was weaponized, and paper etc etc. Before during the time of the Qing Dynasty aka the days of the Dragon Emperor who unified China, also did build the Great Wall in the days of ancient divided China. Until communism arrived to ruin all of that

Oh yes, China was such an extremely peaceful and non-violent place before Communism [rolls eyes].

The Qing dynasty ruled over the Han ethnic majority with an iron fist. They enacted harsh laws and regulations and isolated themselves from the general population. Han men were forced to adopt the Jurchen hairstyle, which meant shaving the front of the head and braiding the remaining hair into a pigtail, or queue. The queue signified Han submission to the Manchu and helped readily identify anyone refusing to accept Qing dominance. By chance, the queue was also an expedient way to clasp a prisoner facing execution.

https://www.scmp.com/culture/article/2177762/how-death-qing-empire-chinas-last-dynasty-gave-life-palace-museum

1 point

If religious wackos like you were in charge the world population would be 15 billion within 30 years and 90 percent of people would be starving. Take your antiquated and highly dangerous interpretation of the Bible and shove it right up your japs eye. Thank you very much.

1 point

Seeing me teach my 4 year old to safely and properly use a 10/22 to plink steel targets and calling it soldiering is like seeing me take her out for ice cream afterward and calling it heroin abuse

Lol. Pretending there's a "safe and proper" way to give a gun to a 4 year old child is like saying there's a safe and proper way to sprinkle anthrax onto your cornflakes. What is actually wrong with you? I mean, apart from being ginger that is.

1 point

Golly, 10 thousand sure does seem like a high likelihood kind of number... until you consider that's out of 168 million women.

It's 10 thousand per year, moron. And the likelihood of the event has no statistical connection to how many other women exist. It does however, have a statistical connection to whether you give your daughter access to a firearm.

Men are unlikely to commit suicide too by the way

Amarel, please shut your stupid mouth. By the same twisted quasi-logic (i.e. population versus confirmed incidents) tigers are unlikely to eat humans, but only an idiot would throw their daughter into a tiger pit.

1 point

I'm sure you weren't listening in sex ed.

I'm sure you attended some pretty weird sex ed if you were taught mothers can reproduce without fathers and fathers can create magic penises.

Sperm determines gender. It comes from the father.

The father doesn't communicate with his sperm so he doesn't determine the gender. Learn to speak English please.


1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]