CreateDebate


Cartman's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Cartman's arguments, looking across every debate.
-4 points
-3 points
-4 points
-2 points
Cartman(18192) Clarified
-2 points
2 points

You need to learn how punctuation works.

1 point

I defend the position that you are horrible at debating.

So, why couldn't you answer my question?

2 points

I disagree with his policy of avoiding facts.

3 points

Congress would have passed some legislation by now.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
3 points

It's called being an independent, you moron. Besides all of you Republicans are massive leftists, so your statement is false any way.

2 points

No, that's not what that means at all. The comment meant that it didn't matter how bad Hillary was, Trump is still awful.

You retards could have chosen anyone else in the primaries.

2 points

Total income in America is 12.95 trillion. Total gdp is 18.65 trillion. Sorry pal, your idea that we only get 10% of our labor is wrong.

Come back if you ever develop enough intelligence to make a coherent argument.

You mean like calling myself the queen of England?

3 points

In have been rewarded for my labor with my pay check. Your entire argument is defeated.

Calling something ridiculous is not an argument.

A ridiculous statement saying you can't ask for proof for s completely unrelated system isn't an argument either, but you probably thought it was.

It is clearly and demonstrably true. If I claim the Moon is not made of green cheese then that is a truth rendered self-evident by the law of reason.

I was under the impression he meant all of the time.

You still are not supporting anything you say with any argument, but at least you haven't spent 20 minutes calling me names, so your attitude is definitely improving, if not your intellect.

You didn't create this debate. Did you create another fake account?

2 points

No video has ever supported your claim before, why would this one be any different?

You did not. You have been an ass clown the entire time you have been on the website, and I am not one.

1 point

capitalism was forcefully implemented by a select few,

No, it wasn't.

Why would the many wilfully consent to a system which rewards only the few?

Everyone who works in a capitalist society is rewarded, not the select few.

You might as well demand "proof" that monarchies were forcefully implemented by a select few.

That's ridiculous.

Certain truths are rendered self-evident by the law of reason.

That's clearly not true.

1 point

Sorry, I don't believe you know how to find videos that support you.

1 point

Forgetting the basics of debating again. It's a shame you are so bad at this.

1 point

Yes, why are you on a debate website when you don't defend any of your positions?

1 point

Yes, being right and wrong is a yuge difference.

1 point

You seem to be under the impression that if the opponent was terrible that the winner can't also be terrible. That's a very stupid thing to think.

You have said countless times that trump is a horrible president.

2 points

I agree. It would be excellent if Trump wasn't president.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

So, not 10 to 11 years like you said.

1 point

All of the republicans on the website seen to think Obama is still president. They won't stop talking about him add if he is currently in charge. Maybe Trump isn't president.

Supporting Evidence: Like this (www.createdebate.com)
0 points

He said Trump wasn't a choice. Pay attention.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Just an FYI, if someone serves as president for more than 2 years of a term they can only be reelected once. Pence would have to serve less than 10 years.

1 point

Maybe you should use the personal income statistics for the debate about corporations paying workers instead of the payment statistics the federal government paid out for social security.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal incomeintheUnited_States

You might notice that wages and productivity used to increase together and now productivity goes up, but wages don't.

1 point

I live in America and it is not true for America. We cut taxes with Reagan in office and ever since wages have stagnated.

1 point

Because when companies have excess, only then do they give bonuses, give raises, hire new people, and not have layoffs. If they have any financial doubt, they do none of the above.

Unfortunately, that's not true. :( I wish it was.

t also makes companies want to stay or come to America rather than Mexico or China, etc.

Fair enough.

Still only addressing why we shouldn't raise taxes though.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

The half that he didn't say is the thing you are claiming he said. You aren't claiming he said the other half.

1 point

He only said half of that. Do you understand that?

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Yes, he never said every working person should be paid the exact same amount. Now you can't read and you can't listen. Congratulations.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Obama didn't say it ?

Correct. Obama never said what you claim he said. You have never once accurately described what Obama has said. He has said some pretty stupid things that are ready to attack, yet you choose to say something incredibly stupid and attribute it to him.

Moonbeam you mean to tell me the Obama Archives are lying ?

No, I already explained this. You are illiterate.

1 point

will destroy society

Correction: would have destroyed society

Women aren't second class citizens now. Get with the times.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

You are talking about it, not Obama. Read your source. It doesn't say what you claim it says.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

It satisfies me greatly. It shows you have no idea what you are talking about.

1 point

Well, that's something we can agree on.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Your "Boy King" spewed it

Source?

1 point

Instead of telling me the news sources you like one at a time, just give them all to me right now.

1 point

"Can I only take as much as I contribute?"

That's what I was talking about.

Equal access doesn't really mean anything. Having access doesn't mean you get to take from it.

1 point

Ok, so you trust the N.Y. post and the Washington Times. What's next? Huffpo?

1 point

No. That was you. You ignored the model described. The model described said you get what you contribute, not everything equal.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Actually the basis of my argument is what people basically are.

And that's completely different than the debate description. That's the point I was making.

You are probably right with your assessment of communism.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

I want you to post from the sources that you trust.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

You are the one who disagrees with facts based on the news source. You projecting your hatred of facts on me doesn't change that. I am trying to figure out your news preference. I bring you articles from the Washington Times and you tell me it is fake news, then you bring news from Washington Times and say it is true. If I bring you a Washington Times article will you admit it is true?

1 point

So, you don't like the Washington Times unless it fits your narrative. Your idea of fake news involves anything liberal. You just like being misinformed. It's sad really. Being misinformed on a debate website is not the way to go.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

That's called a complete failure. You are a complete failure.

1 point

So, is it ok to use the Washington Times when disputing you in the future? Is that a news source you trust?

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Even in your stupid analogy you admit he failed. You are a failure at showing you're not a failure.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

You are on a debate website. You signed up for the class. You claimed everyone else was a moron and you said you had great ideas, so you definitely entered the hall. You can fail exams you don't attempt to take.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

I apologize for thinking you had ideas. I will no longer assert that you have ideas if your own.

 but destroying that aspect of the myth will collapse it's whole.

You failed miserably.

1 point

When everyone gets the same,

Communism is about giving people based on their needs and abilities. If you work hard that's an increase in ability relative to others. You do not have to be get the same amount for communism. And if we go by the debate description that implies you get as much as you contribute, working harder means more contributing which means you get more. The debate description fundamentally described an unequal system, so your argument needs to be tweaked.

Their increased contribution would be spread around to those who do the minimum or nothing. 

A certain amount from your initial contribution will be distributed, but if you get to keep any additional contribution you put in your argument falls apart.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

haven't developed anything

That's funny. In your other debates you very much indicated that you have developed your own ideas.

The time i promised a theory, i had been thinking for a while(several days)

Wow, several days devoted to evolution. You really out did yourself.

. programing, robotics etc i would rather do......

Maybe lower the bar just a tad.

Why would i be thinkingAbout the theory of a moron;

You already said you spent several days thinking about the theory of a moron.

that would make me more moronic than darwin ever was.

That's true and it has.

can only talk about what there already is.

Maybe you shouldn't be bragging about being completely unoriginal.

1 point

"if communism could work"

Communism simply cannot work

Right, it can't work, but not because of the equal distribution of wealth that the debate description described.

1 point

are you alleging that you wouldn't have to work in a communist society? if nobody works, how would you obtain the bare minimum?

Yes I am. They wouldn't be able to. That's not the argument you made in the debate description. That's what I am trying to tell you.

1 point

why would number 3 want to be part of a communist society?

He wouldn't in the same capacity. That was my point. He would just be like 1 and 2 and get by. That's not self evident with your debate description.

and you understand that communism creates an environment that encourages people not to work? 

Yes, but that would only entice people to want communism. I could live in a society where I don't work, it one where I have to work. Why choose the work society if I get the same stuff?

the less you work the more you receive from others. 

No. You receive the bare minimum.

other than that, what is your definition of communism?

You get less if you don't use your abilities. You receive based on your needs and abilities. If you don't use your abilities (work) you only get what you need.

2 points

The topic is how communism makes no sense, not whether or not anyone is trying to implement it.

I told you WHY communism doesn't work

Sorry, but saying that only Fox News talks about it didn't explain anything.

You didn't like it, so you respond with a nasty comment.. What else is new?

Oh no I called you out for not discussing the topic. That's so nasty. I can't figure out what word you misuse the most.

3 points

Look at you. How is the Bronto tactic of completely ignoring the debate topic working out for you?

1 point

There's no selling in communism

False.

everything is already owned by everyone

No, it isn't.

if 3 wanted to give 2 and 1 his produce there'd be no need to initiate communism through a violent revolution because he'd do so himself.

Right, but you aren't person number 3. You are almost guaranteed to be person 1 or 2. Twice as many people benefit in your analogy by switching to communism. When more people would benefit there is a chance it would happen. That's the only reason why it would happen.

2 points

Or in other words "There is no reason to risk anything if you can't benefit from the risk." If only I had realized that earlier.

2 points

Your argument shows that we can't tax companies out of all of their money. Why cut taxes though?

1 point

I already explained myself.

"If there is any profit being made by the company that you work for and you don't receive any of it then you are getting less than you contribute."

Let's say there is a guy who owns a company and he employs 10 engineers. He pays each person $100k and they sell $2 million worth of products. Let's say there is $500k in overhead. That leaves $500k left for the owner. If it were communism the $500k that went to the owner would be distributed to the workers since they are responsible for the work that went into selling that much. In that case communism benefited 10 people and hurt only 1. That's how it is supposed to work at least.

1 point

Well, this is just another case of liberals not understanding racism. He was attacking the black cop because he thought the black guy was racist for arresting a white guy. I don't see Shia as racist here, just your typical liberal who doesn't understand racism.

0 points

 more taxes

Again, you demonstrate that more taxes are bad. Why do you think taxes need to be reduced?

3 points

The only people who would be receiving less under a communist society are the risk takers. There are few risk takers. The overwhelming majority of people would gain on paper. The overwhelming majority of people would benefit if communism could work.

5 points

That's the only part of communism that makes sense. Most people get less than they contribute. If there is any profit being made by the company that you work for and you don't receive any of it then you are getting less than you contribute. Communism is supposed to equalize the money for workers. That's where the problem lies. Businesses don't exist without risk. There is no reason to risk anything if you can't benefit from the risk.

0 points

That's what your God says. Thank you for finally admitting that following the bible is inhuman.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

Your argument shows that we can't tax companies into oblivion. Are you saying that companies like Baldor are being taxed into oblivion?

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

You are saying that the right is trying to start the civil war while you are the one advocating violence.

1 point

In the real world, there WERE Nazis marching in Charlottesville.. Trump DID support them.

The weren't really Nazis, but let's say you are right. You are calling people that weren't with those people Nazis. And Trump condemned those people.

doesn't take a genius to figure out where HIS loyalties are..

Yeah, to peaceful people.

But, look.. We DON'T agree.. We NEVER will..

That's because you are a violent person who blames everyone else for your violence.

That's why it's BEST that we solve this on the battlefield.. I'm READY.. I'll look for YOU, you nasty man.

You can't even figure out that saying we should solve this on the battlefield means you want violence. There us no way you will survive if you get any where near a battlefield.

0 points

ROFLOL, for the last time, one of the few things Goverment MUST DO, is protect innocent life.

But, you haven't asked for the government to prevent unwanted pregnancies. So, you don't actually believe that's true.

For you to keep saying pro life people want bigger Government makes you a complete moron!

You aren't pro life. You are pro government regulation. You want bigger government. Only a complete moron would say that only asking for more government isn't asking for more government.

Do you like Government making laws protecting your life? You complete idiot, I guess you are for bigger Government.

You are against the government protecting your life. A complete idiot is someone who says that they are against the government protecting them, then song that's what the government is for.

Get some semblance of a brain!

You keep accusing me of having the stupid positions you have. If you think the strawman arguments you make for me are brainless it's because it is your argument.

As always, no response to supporting abortions for viable unborn special needs bbies.

If God wanted them to live He wouldn't have made them deformed.

0 points

You moron. I demonstrated that you have no clue what hypocrisy is.

You have caused so many unwanted pregnancies it's insane. Your abortion rhetoric is destroying the nation. The only shred of humanity that you have is from saying that we need to reduce the size of the inhuman government. You give that up when you demand the government be put in charge of abortion. You have absolutely no humanity.

Speaking of hypocrisy, bragging that you don't talk to people who you think are deceptive, then criticizing someone who stupid talking to you is massively hypocritical. Especially since I proved how you are completely wrong just by reading 2 paragraphs.

I responded to everything you said, too. ;)

2 points

You responded to yourself, moron. You can't even figure out how to use this website. There us no way you are going to survive a civil war.

When the military gets deployed they will start shooting at the most violent people and that had proven to be antifa and the left.

1 point

Look at you. You abandon the discussion then call me nasty. Did you take a class to be this hypocritical, or is it natural born talent?

Stop calling everybody Nazis and white supremacists and you might stop getting called an idiot.

1 point

A) the white supremacists aren't in the government, and you haven't been talking about starting a civil war against Trump.

B) you are the idiot who brought up guns

1 point

A) you aren't fighting the government.

B) you having guns and you starting a civil war are massively different things

C) you didn't mention having guns at all

2 points

"That's why I think we oughta solve this on the battlefield. I will NEVER buy your crap, and you won't buy mine.. Let the best man win.."

Did someone on the right say that?

1 point

Just for your knowledge, shaming people is NOT TELLING THEM HOW TO LIVE! It's trying to educate them to the dangers of immoral irresponsible lives that do so much harm to our children aour nations.

You are too stupid to call anyone else a fool. You don't tell people how to live, you just tell people how not to live. It's the same thing.

I thought you were big on educating people to the irresponsibility of not usng birth control, as do I. I guess it is ok when YOU tell people how to live! HYPOCRITE!

I am not the one complaining that people are mad at for me educating them. You claiming that me educating people is telling people how to live, but you telling people how to live is not is the hypocrisy. Sorry, I am done here. I can't keep reading what you write. You never get anything right. You claim that conservatives want to reduce the government, but the only issue you care about is giving the government power over abortion. You think Soros are bad, but you don't want to prevent pregnancies. It never ends.

I seriously stooped reading the rest of your "argument". For each of the rest of your paragraphs my response is "no, FromWithin. That's the exact opposite of house the world works. Add always you don't understand anything that really happens."

2 points

It can't be. Every person in the world believes that.

0 points

People like me are instantly ridiculed as some bible thumping lunatic who wants to judge people and tell them how to live.

You come on this website saying that we need to follow the bible and that we need to shame people into living the right way. You are a bible thumping lunatic because you say you thump your bible. You see accused of telling people how to live because you tell people how to live.

1 point

You are less honest than CNN. Do you know how bad you have to be to be less honest than CNN?

1 point

We once were a nation doing it's best to live up to common sense moral values derived from our Christian heritage. 

That's no where close to accurate.

We now have self consumed people who support killing viable babies for any reason.

I agree. Those damn people who hate condoms and refuse to teach sex education are awful.

Man has no answers because the bigots who hate God will do anything to make sure we never admit how once lifting up traditional Godly moral values actully worked better than todays anything goes self love culture.

The bigots who hate God (you) are the first to make these claims.

Nobody wants moral laws forced on a nation,

LIAR!!!!!!!

But of course, the anti God Progressive movement says NO! We will no longer shame immoral irresponsible behavior no matter how many fatherless children there are.

You are the one who refuses to promote safe sex and sex education.

4 points

Simply based on the fact that the left is going out of their way to cause violence I have to believe they want the civil war more.

1 point

You always suggest the exact opposite of what is smart.

1 point

You have cleared up nothing.

Cartman(18192) Clarified
1 point

It seems strange to consider life so sacred that there is absolutely no way we can allow abortion, but also recognize that humans are so bad that they need to be wiped out sometimes.

1 point

You aren't very bright. Why do you ask questions that you don't want to hear the answer to?

1 point

The special theory of evolution you developed is Aristotle's? What?

1 point

Where is that alternative theory you told us you were going to give us?

1 point

The wage gap is explained by the fact that women work in fields that pay less.

Your criticism of the use of the word tougher is ridiculous and stupid. It causes you to defend communism.

1 point

My argument was that people in different fields should get paid differently. You disagreed. Do you think that people in different fields should be paid different amounts?

1 point

Once you commit a capital crime you have proven that you aren't an innocent person worthy of being saved. A fetus hasn't done anything to not be considered innocent. Hope that clears it up.

1 point

My argument was that people in different fields should get paid differently. You disagreed. Do you think that people in different fields should be paid different amounts?

1 point

You are criticizing me for a typo, but defending another person for using words incorrectly. Why are you such a hypocrite?

1 point

was complaining because your arguments make no sense. 

And you were wrong. What's your point?

Read it all again and if you still think I'm defending a 'communist' position, then I'll leave you thinking so.

My argument was that people in different fields should get paid differently. You disagreed. Do you think that people in different fields should be paid different amounts?

don't care what you think they indicated.

Yes, keep avoiding the truth.

She only talked about the tax, and you should not put words in one's mouth.

The pink tax is not about sales tax only. It is about women paying more for things in general. If I said I like to watch sports, then I talked about baseball it is not unreasonable to bring up other sports.

No, I don't think I did. 

That's just because you don't care what I say.

And WHERE did you address what I said?? 

When you talked about the wage gap. Also, I explained the word tougher for you which was tough for you.

Sold' isn't the same as should.

You figured it out though you massive hypocrite.

I didn't understand it until I read it thrice

Oh no. How terrible for you.


1 of 245 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]