Marriage is the couples choice. It shouldn't matter if the government doesn't want them to get married.
It's a way to permanently scar your loved ones and neighbors because you can't handle crap other people have been taking for their whole lives.
There were witnesses that saw Treyvon mashing Zimmerman's head into the ground, but Zimmerman SHOULD HAVE BEEN WEARING IDENTIFICATION! Treyvon Martin obviously thought Zimmerman was stalking him! I hope neighborhood watch group I.D. is the one good thing that will come out of this case.
Freedom of speech is a right too. Freedom of belief only applies when a government places laws against a religion.
A fetus hasn't developed consciousness. So a fetus isn't a human as much as a possibility of a human. Abortion is as much murder as wearing a condom. You probably weren't pro-life but I'm going to argue with you anyway.
I don't know exactly what this argument is about but I am Atheist. So... yeah.
In Mexico. Just tell them you'll pay them in U.S. dollars if they act evil.
That joke was probably in bad taste.
I will ask you this: Would you rather get a Windows 8 phone than an iPhone 5? I think that answers this question.
The computer company has nothing to do with the original sin.
What with the 3D printer coming out? I'm sure there is technology waiting to be found. To quote a 20th century patent officer "All that can be invented has already been invented". Look at how that turned out.
There has never been any conclusive evidence that God even exists in this universe.
There is a science behind the Big Bang theory. Does anyone have evidence against it?
Bahahahaha. The Bibe is firmly based on facts. You ever considered going into stand up comedy? You'd be great.
I've been reading a few of your arguments on CreateDebate. They're moronic beyond words. Do us all a favor and get off the internet. Now.
There is an entire study on how the world was made, and the information is available to you if you take the time to look. Also, define "hallucinating". Hallucinating is certainly not when someone doesn't have enough evidence to believe in something crazy.
That is the laziest argument I have ever heard. If that is what you truly think the mindset of an Atheist is, then you are an idiot of the highest regard.
There is no evidence as to why something doesn't exist. Why don't you prove there is no invisible flying spaghetti monster? It is up to the supporter of something preposterous to come up with the evidence, not the one who doesn't believe it. If you were trying to get an invention patented, would you come up with evidence as to why your product is great, or would you do the lazy and stupid thing and force the patent officer to provide reasons as to why your invention SHOULDN'T be patented? One of the reasons he would give is that you haven't told him why your product is great.
God helps priests find their car keys but ignores SIDS in Africa, and murder in Mexico. What a great God.
The fundamental laws of the universe (Gravity, Electromagnetism, Strong force, and Weak force) are required for a being like God to exist. However, the fundamental laws of the universe did not exist until nanoseconds AFTER the Big Bang. Even if he did not require those laws to exist, if he CAN physically affect the universe (blizzards, tornadoes, hurricanes) than he was most certainly torn apart and killed by the Singularity that caused the Big Bang. Or the explosion. There was no way he could have survived the beginning of the Universe and still be able to physically affect the universe.
Also, the purpose of life is literally just to reproduce.
I only watched the first 30 seconds, but this is your proof? God hasn't affected the planet since... Ever! Evolution flatly contradicts any need for a God to have created the universe.
One is not saved by false hope. False hope accomplishes nothing.
If that's true, then the origins of the idea of God are flawed. If modern research cannot prove an entity like God, how do you (or how did medieval philosophers) know that he exists? Scientific law states that the only reason for believing in something is conclusive proof. Not believing in god won't affect us if he is entirely independent from this universe. Believing in god just makes you look primitive.
The universe is destined to collapse on itself in the next few billion years, so your argument is invalid.
It is impossible on every level to prove something DOES NOT exist. If someone makes a preposterous claim (An invisible being created all life) than it is the supporter's duty to prove their claim. Scientific law states that the only reason to believe in something is evidence, and since there is no conclusive evidence to prove God exists, I don't believe he does.
To address your concerns on how humanity was created, there is a very precise study that encompasses the history of life on Earth. Billions of years ago, long before dinosaurs existed, there was no life on Earth. None. But if the conditions are right, (and this has been tested and proven in a laboratory) basic elements can come together with electricity and form Amino Acids. Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins, which are, in turn, the building blocks of single-celled life. Single celled organisms clump together in cultures, which think and move like one creature. Symbiotic relationships like those then evolved to be larger, to more easily take out the competition. One of the first animals on Earth was a fish, because bacteria evolved quickly in the ocean. Fish species split, grew, and evolved. Humans and all mammals are descendants of the first fish. Insects are the descendants of the arthropods that evolved to feed on those fish. About sex, God did not create it. Any animal that cannot reproduce dies out in the first generation.
It is ignorant and primitive to say an intangible being made it all pop into existence.
