CreateDebate


DJSNuva1's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of DJSNuva1's arguments, looking across every debate.
2 points

It's nice to see that none of you have any idea what you are talking about. Have you ever heard of Pre-Crisis, Silver Age Superman? Well, back to about 1956-1970 Superman could literally sneeze out a Solar System, blow out a star like a birthday candle, re-ignite stars with his heat vision, move at speeds far in excess to the speed of light, not to mention survive the force of "100 Galaxies" being thrown at him, among many, many outlandish things such as the stated above. There is absolutely no chance for Goku.

1 point

So, you're calling yourself an asshole. That makes sense.

1 point

I'm not saying that the students shouldn't be punished. I'm saying they shouldn't be punished by their teachers. Teachers and students alike should NOT curse, and they should all be punished according to the rules.

1 point

Yes, that was a typo thank you for pointing that out. Why should teachers be able to discipline their students? What would make that right? The teachers have no responsibility to discipline other people's children, however, if the student has misbehaved, the student should be sent to the office by that teacher. So what if the children curse all day long? Does that make it right? The adults are supposed to follow the rules of conduct just as the children are-- If teachers or students do not follow the rules, that does not make it right.

And you didn't answer my question. Why are high school students attempting to get an education for themselves 'delinquents'?

1 point

the students or teachers should swear. It's against rules of conduct. What makes highschool students getting an education for themselves delinquents? If the admistration wants to set rules to limit the students conduct, they should adhere to those rules. Unless they want to be hypocrites.

0 points

This isn't a debate about equality. It's a debate about whether or not teachers should obey the rules they impose upon their students. Not about homework or assignments, but about the rules of conduct that one should follow. You're metaphor looks solid at first glance, but give it say, five seconds of thought. We are NOT debating about whether or not teachers should do the same work as the students - That's clearly ridiculous. What we are talking about is the rules of conduct that should be followed, unrelated to the assignments of the 'worker'. And administrator should do his/her job, a teacher should do his/her job, a student should do his/her job, but they should all adhere to the same rules of conduct. So, Like I said, imposing a rule while not following it yourself is hypocrisy.

1 point

The liberal punks out there generally want bigger government, as in, tyranny, not anarchy. Conservatives lean more towards anarchy then the liberals.

0 points

No, all the idiotoc hollywood morons are liberal, so that would be a noo

1 point

Anyone who imposes a rule but doesn't follow it is a hypocrite.

1 point

I judge people by the content of their character, not by the color of their skin.

1 point

Corporations don't vote, people vote. No matter how much money a candidate is given from the corporations, people are still going to vote for who they think is right.

So, why does this matter?

5 points

Hitler was a gun control advocate, liberals are gun control advocates. Hitler was pro-abortion, liberals are pro-abortion. Hitler was an animal rights freak, liberals are animal rights freaks. Need I say more?

1 point

I read this myself. It's a good book, with good arguements, and citations for EVERYTHING

3 points

It represents the supreme dislike for Obama's Healthcare plan. It was the people's turn (Liberal peoples) to decide whether or not they wanted this crap, and they have chosen no.

1 point

I am a direct descendant from the Lee family (As in Robert E Lee), and I believe that it's a sign of my heritage.

1 point

SO you're admitting that President Obama was lying to the american people?

Because he's not letting the American public see the healthcare debate.

http://community.advanceweb.com/blogs/hx_2/archive/2010/01/05/c-span-requests-access-to-health-care-talks.aspx

1 point

No, it's not being televised, get your facts straight. Taking a position like "It is" makes you look ignorant

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/ view/opinion/Health-Care-Reform-Will-Not-Be-Televised-Should-It-Be-2111

1 point

So, you're admitting that President Obama lied to the American public?

1 point

I have yet to see a completely logical response as to why men hold virtually all political power-- Yes, there are some women that play a very active role in politics (Senator Hillary Clinton, Barbra Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, etc.).. However, this is not a debatable fact. A VAST, and I mean VAST majority of countries have men that rule the country. Why is this so?

0 points

There are more trees in the United States today then when the country was founded.

http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/bot00/bot00090.htm

0 points

This debate reminds me of "Recess: School's Out". And I would agree with the premise of that film :-)

1 point

The government should NOT have the power to take away our guns-- If you want to carry a gun, you have the right to do so.

1 point

I think that Bill O'Rielly is an intelligent moderate republican.

3 points

Fox news is conservative, and nearly everything else in media is liberal such as NPR, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, PBS, etc.

2 points

"found that the Big Bang Theory is the most widely accepted"

Let's just say, for the sake of arguement, that the big bang theory is true. What caused it? And what caused that, and before that, and before that? etc.

There is a concrete belief among athiests that there is no God. The end result of that way of thinking is that nothing created the universe in the begining. So, in the beginning, aithiests believe that the universe spontaneously generated out of nothing.

1 point

Evolution has not been proven. Were you there when evolution was happening? Are there any videos? Records? Pictures? No, there are not. Therefore, there is no concrete proof that directly points to evolution. Believing in evoluition requires an element of faith, because there isn't any concrete proof for it.

2 points

""Aithiesm constitutes that NOTHING created the universe."

Not a very good choice of words, by the way... atheists believe that God IS Nothing (in other words... something that is non-existent)."

If my statement(Aithiesm constitutes that NOTHING created the universe) was correct, then why did you feel the need to correct me?

Merry Christmas

2 points

So, what is the difference in saying "God IS Nothing" and "There is no God" and "God is nonexistent"? There is no difference, all of the above statements have the same meaning.

1 point

Evolution does not neccasarilly contradict intellegent design. God could have created the universe and used evolution as means of creation.

athe·ism: a disbelief in the existence of deity

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ATHEISM

Aithiests believe that there IS NO GOD, not that God is "nothing"

1 point

I agree; If you learn everything, if you know everything, then what is the purpose of life?

1 point

It's called the THEORY of evolution for a reason. Do you know why? Because it's not the LAW of evolution because it has no proof!

Even IF evolution was truth(which it isn't) it doesn't proove against intelligent design. Intelligent design constitutes that something created the universe; Aithiesm constitutes that NOTHING created the universe.

Personally, I believe that the earth and universe was created in six literal days, and evolution has no more proof than creationism IMHO

2 points

Wee already have Grand Theft Auto, how much worse is this game?

3 points

For the party that is supposed to be the most caring and non-judgmental, liberals are the most judgmental people I've ever met. The Roman Catholics and The Crusades were terrible; But that was the fault of the people, not the fault of principal.

And it is the responsibility of Christians to share the truth of Jesus the Christ to the world as explained in Matthew 28:16-20.

1 point

And the people of 31 states agree with me that homosexuals should not be able to get a marriage license.

1 point

The Dark Knight? Nothing like Batman? Have you read a Batman comic within the last ten years? TDK was based on The Killing Joke, a batman comic.

2 points

Ha. I laugh in the face of death. We all die one day, and I know my final destination -- Do you?

2 points

Who cares, it's our god given right to eat the animals. I love animals and also love to eat them.

2 points

Quite frankly you are an idiot. You say white people are wrong because of their actions -- And turn around and say it's not because they are white while in fact YOU ARE judging on color.

1 point

What about Comic Books such as The Watchmen? That is a very deep intellegint book --

1 point

Black Holes/"Black Stars" are just a theory -- There is no actual proof that they even exist. So I say neither.

1 point

The ends do NOT justify the means. If you are going to do something, do it right, you can't kill one person in order to save two --- That is just wrong.

1 point

Obviously he doesn't deserve it if he doesn't think he deserved it. He basically got the peace prize for not being George Bush -- Which is retarded.

1 point

Evolution is crap. That is exactly why it is called the THEORY of evolution (Truly only a hypothesis) and not the LAW of evolution. Intellegent Design IS in fact the most credible reason for existence.

1 point

The bible says;

(1st John 4:2-3)

2This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, 3but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world.

2 points

No, it's not murder. Murder is when one human being kills another human being on purpose, and last time I checked animals are not human beings.

I don't doubt that 99% of people on this site eat beef.

In the Bible, After the flood, God gave the animals as food for humanity to eat (Genesis 9).

0 points

No one has even tried to dispute Mr.King yet --

"We judge the nominees not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

1 point

There is proof that Jesus exists in historical texts other than the bible -- Whenever we date a paper, we pay homage to Christainity with Before Christ and Ano Domini (I know it's spelled wrong)

1 point

I support the war on ter'r. Terrorism is quite possibly the biggest threat in the world today.

P.S Tacos RULE!

2 points

Japan got what it deserved. They were well aware of our capabilities.. And therefore reaped the consequences of their choices.

1 point

The Two-Party system is tottally wack, I don't think it matters if you are republican or a democrat -- What does matter is what you believe in.

1 point

He didn't deserve it, he said he didn't deserve it, and you don't deserve it either, so I'd expect you to tell the truth and say you don't deserve it as well.

1 point

Are you people nuts?!?!? Haven't youguys ever watched Recess: School's Out????

1 point

I think that we should have the right to chronically use MOST drugs. Not drugs like PCP though- Drugs like PCP can directly hurt others and has no real benefits whatsoever. One man on PCP ripped out his sons eyeballs and ate them -- many others have attacked police officers, killed themselves, became a danger to everyone around them, etc.

I'm all for Marijuana though.

2 points

Even Barrack Obama said "I don't desere this award". You are arguing against the president?

0 points

Wow, what crawled up your @$$ and died? Stop making such a big deal out of a joke thread.

Geez, people.

2 points

A father is as much of a parent to that baby as the mother. A decision on abortion should be made by both the father and the mother.

1 point

It doesn't matter if you are judging people or peopleS. The same principal still aplies; Judging people or peopleS on their color is, in fact, absurd.

1 point

The animals are designed to be eaten. I really don't see why we shouldn't eat meat.

1 point

The bouncy is just tottally awesome. Period. Who doesn't love boobs?

2 points

I haven't seen anything that he did that is worth the nobel peace prize. nothing.

0 points

The fact is, aithiesm is total crap. Science proves intelligent design. Try to prove me wrong. Where did it all start? The big bang? Before that? And that? And before that? No athiest knows what caused existence, but I do.

I'll tell you the answer; God created it all.

1 point

At times, it can be an oxymoron. I believe that there are smart people in the military, and also complete idiots.

5 points

IMO, animals do NOT have the same rights as humans. If a person is hunting, kills an animal, skins it and eats it, I see absolutely nothing wrong with that.

Animal torture is wrong, though.

1 point

I judge people by the content of their character, NOT by the color of their skin.

--MLK jr.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]