CreateDebate


EvilMarxist's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of EvilMarxist's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

@Nom

Yeah that's one of the things Peter said in zeitgeist funnily enough. Remember that part when he talked about how we must protect the internet because it allows for the free exchange of ideas? I actually told her about you too, it was at the part where he talks about 9/11 and I was surprised how open she was to the idea that it was an inside job. I told her about the article you wrote and at some time I want to show that to her.

0 points

That word "Mingiwuwu" is it code for "I don't know anything because I believe in magic calculators that create flat earth simulations by having sex with numbers" ?

EvilMarxist(27) Clarified
2 points

love can be worser than ever

You could have typed that out a bit more eloquently you know. Just saying. Next time try something like "love can be a detriment if you love the wrong thing".

1 point

Well, in a way she sacrificed her body. She also sacrificed her money and time.

EvilMarxist(27) Clarified
1 point

@Spuds

What do you think love means? .

1 point

Probably, I don't know because I've never tried it but I wouldn't be surprised.

2 points

Why is it never hot girls who do stuff like this, then I'd be cool with it.

1 point

May as well. He's just gunna end up eating up resources in jail anyway. May as well exterminate the disease.

1 point

There is a tank near my house at a war memorial. Someone tried to make it operational and steal it but they were caught and put in jail.

1 point

Tell me all about how gun bans work ? You got some information ???????

Why don't you just scamper off now little britches. We wouldn't want your pants to shrink any more while you're in public, or we might see something unsightly.

1 point

We don't have a gun problem. We have a Democrat problem. Why do I say this? The majority of violent crime in America is committed in a handful of cities. All of them run by democrats. All with strict gun laws. And all of them with large minority populations.

I see, so it's all because of those damn left wing niggers, eh Hitler? If those crowded smelly cities were inhabited by gun loving white people there would be no problem at all, right? There are many other correlations you could be making ya know, the fact that the cities have much denser populations or that they have higher poverty rates for example. But no, you jump straight to democrats and minorities because that's the type of racist bible thumping old world swine you are.

0 points

I've had enough of your pathetic ramblings. Your thought process comes from a time that should be forgotten. Your ideology is a throwback to the times when science was considered fringe and if you won a duel it was because sky man supposedly favors you. You don't stand for progress or anything worthwhile for that matter. You are superstition and ignorance incarnate, and it's time for your way of thinking to disappear.

2 points

All music is a matter of personal taste.

I personally think you're a stale, mummified buffalo scrotum that was left out in the sun for far too long.

1 point

Rap music was created so that people with no musical talent could also make a living in the music industry.

I'm sick of this ignoramus bullshit. You don't know anything about rap, you just see idiots like 2 chains and eazy e and form the stereotype in your mind that this is what all rap is like. The gangster rap and pop rap is what's popularized because there are far more idiots than intelligent people in this world. There are many different types of rappers with varying levels of ability and subject matter. Saying that rap is for those with no musical talent is the same as saying classical music is for those with no lyrical talent. Rap is a very lyrical form of music, and is the lyrical equivalent of classical music in that it surpasses all forms of music when it comes to lyrics just as classical music surpasses all other forms in terms of the music itself. Let me show you what I mean.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRxa5aIVo3Y

0 points

I understand that fools

No, you don't understand anything. "Fool" is your code word for people who aren't retarded, because anyone who disagrees with you is labeled a fool, yet anyone who's not a fool disagrees with you about everything.

1 point

I'm a Jew. I'm attacked relentlessly for it

Quit being such a big fat sissy about it. All we're trying to do is show you why it's stupid to even call yourself a Jew.

1 point

I spent a few minutes on Google, and I couldn't find one person who agrees with you. Not at all surprising.

Interesting, in that case he might actually be right.

1 point

I hope they do, along with the Fascists

That's like saying "I hate fire, so I'm going to shoot water with a fire extinguisher"

the Communists

Communists as in marxists?

ALL of Trumps friends and CON-spiritors!

Communists aren't Trump's friends. You are actually closer to being on Trump's side than a marxist.

Then, we can get back to freedom and democracy.

You literally have no idea what you're even talking about.

EvilMarxist(27) Clarified
2 points

On a small local level, say 100, 1000 or a couple thousand people (or less), they can implement any system they agree on, as I see it. If a small community of a few thousand decides they don't want to pay taxes, and have a voluntary community fund for budgeting, private security forces, etc. etc. etc. (essentially, no gov. involvement), that is cool with me. Their success or failure is 100% on them.

In principle I agree with you but when it comes to anarcho-capitalism specifically the problem is that the "private security forces" will become the armed thugs of those who have the most capital. a true "free market" would allow the most wealthy to control the land and resources, bully those with less capital and eventually form a hierarchical structure that would lead us back to croney capitalism and centralized control.

EvilMarxist(27) Clarified
2 points

One (substantial) issue is that there is so much disagreement in the sciences, then, whichever group prevails (for whatever reason), will have an enormous amount of power that others do not wield.

Indeed, much of what is called science is not objective, but within scientific methodology there is the potential for objectivity. The key is for people to become "scientists" in a general sense rather than merely "users of science". Most scientists today are not scientific people, if they were scientific thinkers in general they wouldn't have opinions or beliefs at all, they would instead have things which they know to be proven thoroughly, things they suspect to be more likely and things which are left purely to speculation, observation and experimentation. Scientists are trained to use specific methodologies within specific fields, not to be scientific people in a complete sense. There needs to be a cultural shift from opinion and belief based thinking to fact and speculation based thinking before man kind can be ruled by reason and methodology rather than by other men.

name a modern issue where there would be an expert consensus concerning how to most efficiently handle it?

Even issues which relate specifically to the human condition have a basis in objective reality. When it comes to something like climate change, it's easy to see there is an objective truth to it and a most practical way of dealing with it. Thus a consensus could be formed. But even things like racism boil down to technical issues at the core. People are conditioned to be racist because that is part of their culture or experience. If they were instead conditioned to know the technical differences between races, and think about those differences on that basis, they would not have a subjective attitude about it or form prejudice.

EvilMarxist(27) Clarified
1 point

"Community by Community Domino Effect" I support, and actually advocate.

I actually want to mix the domino method with the "inside job" method. Violent revolution is totally out of the question and would not lead to an ideal scenario at all. But if we can shift the larger systems while having smaller communities as examples of people living in new and better ways Then we can defend the communities and allow them to experiment with new ideas and systems, which will allow for a smoother transition and stop the current establishment from fucking up the communities that form. This is what I see as the best way of having a new and better culture arise. The smaller communities will serve not only as catalysts for the domino effect but they will also serve as experiments to work out what works and what doesn't in a microcosm of a civilization before implementing it on a larger scale. Meanwhile the current establishment will be peacefully re-shaped from within as more people join "the agenda" and eventually everything will merge into one superior culture.

Anarcho-Cap

This system is problematic because the government essentially becomes whoever has the most money.

it is startling this hasn't already been happening. That is due to the nature of Nation-States who like to seize as much land as possible, and bind it to their rule.

Yes, exactly. That's why we need to use the peaceful "inside job" method in conjunction with having smaller communities break off and start operating under their own system.

EvilMarxist(27) Clarified
1 point

every system will be built into one form or another hierarchy

In an ideal and fully civilized society, the hierarchy does not exist as an institutionalized body of individuals or a class structure. The hierarchy (if it can be called that at all) is simply based on who has the intelligence, knowledge and proficiency to know what should be done and how it should be done. This would not be based on authority or some dominant ideology but a system of methodologies. The methodology itself would have the "authority" because decisions would be arrived at through the methodology rather than made by the intellectual "elites" themselves.

1 point

Anything else?

Why do you think your a master debater?

when your just a massive masturbator

fallacy ejaculator

who wants to make stacks of paper

from the masses' labour

while you savour Trump's asses' flavour?

1 point

Any questions?

Why did you rape your own dad and murder your pet lizard?


1 of 3 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]