CreateDebate


FUNMUN's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of FUNMUN's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

i dont know what the beast is, but when it come i believe that God will reveal it to Christians and there wont have to be any debate about it

1 point

If someone is looking for sympathy they can pick up a dictionary and look between shit and syphilis

3 points

Donald Trump is not an idiot. Despite what most media sources say about him he is a political genius.

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

Someone may not want to have there shot to echo through the woods, which would scare away any other game within the area making it harder to hunt.

2 points

I would strongly argue no, but that is because i am a Christian. I am not going to force my morals over someone because that is tyrannical and not what God wants, but i would strongly encourage people to wait for marriage, because pre martial sex can pervert what true intimacy is.

1 point

America is a global super power, and if it were to take all troops into America the world would erupt into chaos. Isis would run rampant in the middle east, while Saudi Arabia and Israel would both fall without the support of American military. Furthermore, outside of the middle east, Boko haram would run rampant in Nigeria and west Africa more than it already has, and south Korea and Japan would surely be invaded or attacked by North Korea. Also, the United States military is bigger than the next four countries militaries on the list, and our brining all of American troops into the United states would be unreasonable. The USA is not under any threat of an invasion, and you cannot attack individual terrorist groups with an army.

A useful link for military size: I've checked it with other sources and they all give the same results http://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.asp?country_id=united-states-of-america

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

does anyone in politics or media ever keep their word? thats what is was supposed to be sorry

1 point

i have a beterr question... does anyone ever keep their word?

2 points

i have accepted God the father son and holy spirit into my heart and i was baptized this september im am going to heaven and i am going to try to spread Gods words to all those i can so they can have a relationship with God...but i m not going to do it on this website

2 points

hold up there buddy.... keep religion and state separate... or did you learn nothing about the reformation. a leader who holds Christian values would be nice, but i will practice Christianity no matter who is in charge

1 point

i guess i would have to agree with you on that... but it depends on who the dictator or monarchy is...

1 point

any situation where a women hits a man with malicious intent then a man should be able to hit back.

1 point

i dont really have a problem if a girl plays on a boys sports team, but if it came to my daughter i would rather her play on a girls team because it encourages a good female community where she can go to if she is in trouble or needs emotional help im not saying girls are fragile im just saying that boys do not understand girls what so ever. A girl is most certainly tough enough to play in Boys sports... i think my sister has a harder left hook than my friends haha

1 point

a man cannot give birth to a child... Men and women will never be equal, because in order to be equal you must have the same thing and that is impossible. Instead of pushing for equal rights push for fairness and justice. I am not saying that woman do not have equal worth as citizens. im just saying that when it comes to issues do not push for equality push for fairness and justice.

1 point

if we are talking a about efficiency then the absolute monarchy is the most efficient... 1 man or woman says what they want and it gets done, but an absolute monarchy is tyrannical and causes the nation to violate many human rights violations, and the minority or majority is never heard. just because a government is efficient does not mean it is good. I think that the governments role in society should be to uphold the voices of all people and serve the people. A government should not regulate everything its citizens do, i think the role of the government is to make laws that protect the citizens and not laws that benefit the government officials... i know that is not really possible, but that i would be the best type of government. Also, i agree that a democratic republic is the best from of government that we have right now.

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

absolute democracy, and you can add other forms of government i was just putting a list of examples together

1 point

The Declaration of Independence paints clear vision of what America should be: equal, fair, just and free, but it is soaked in hypocrisy and tyranny.

The Draft of the declaration of independence (DOI) paints a picture of America where all men are created equal with inalienable rights given to them by God. “We hold these truth to be self evident: that all men are created equal: that they are endowed by their creator with a certain inalienable rights; that among these are life liberty and the pursuit of happiness”(140). The draft of the DOI states that the ruling government can not take away these God given rights. Moreover, All men are created equal and free in and have the ability to make themselves happy. The American dream is written and intertwined throughout the whole draft of the DOI.

The inalienable rights of the people are kept by the government. Therefore, the people of America must give up some of their liberties to the government in order for these rights to be kept. “Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government”(140). The draft of the DOI would be the the best form of a republic, because the people would be in control and have to ability to overthrow the central government, but the DOI is highly hypocritical and tyrannical.

Inalienable rights, life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and all men are created equal, are not all kept by the government. Women, slaves, and indians were all valued as less than human by the white men writing this draft of the declaration. “ he waged a war on human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty on the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incurable misery and death in their transportation”(142). How can colonist condemn such a thing when they in fact are the ones buying the slaves and driving the slave trade, and putting such harsh punishments of the slaves, or even killing them? The American colonists took this out of the DOI because they knew this would end slavery, which for many of them was their form of income. How are the white male colonists any better than the english tyrants if the value income over human life? Black slaves could not learn to read or write, could not vote, and are possessions to their masters, and they are certainly not equal to the white men, and most certainly are not free.

Indians, the native people of America, were being abused attacked, and robbed, and while the DIO calls all men equal and that men cannot forcefully take the property from another man they are doing the opposite to the indians. “for depriving us in many cases of the benefits of trial by jury: for transporting seas to be tried for pretended offences: for abolishing the system of free english laws in its neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries, so as to render it at once”(141). The colonists condemn this action, but they themselves are actively doing the same thing to the Indians. The settlers expanded and trampled over Indian lands while shouting for freedom from a tyrannical government. The Indians were not represented in any form of government yet, the government would still pass laws to take there land. The DOI only calls for equal rights among white males, and everyone else must follow the rules set by them or penalties will be enacted.

The DOI is a reflection of England's rule over the colonies except, the American white males who wrote the DOI are the tyrants while the slaves, Indians and women are the victims. The DOI must not become law because it would cause much more harm than good and would only divide the country even more than it already is. Our republic would be living in inequality, drenched in tyranny, and soaked in hypocrisy ( not that it already is) nothing of the vision that the DOI wants to paint over our eyes.

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

we all make mistakes:) what do you think about this debate?

1 point

im not familiar with this topic, but im going to argue that they are not. A society cannot be both fair and equal. fair means everyone gets what they deserve, and equal means everyone gets the same thing. but for the purpose of the this debate i would argue that individuals who are aware of there surroundings and use there voice to influence those around them. often time a government views people as bodies used for gears in a machine instead of as a mind that thinks for its self.

2 points

thanks for the definition a constitutional monarchy doesn't sound all that bad, but not really necessary and i am strongly opposed to any monarchy what so ever. also, i agree that Saudi Arabia is just a glorified dictator ship.

1 point

as someone who is taking Arabic in school that is accurate

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

im not trying to play stupid, i just am stupid and was wondering that the definition of a constitutional l monarchy is?

1 point

Kids nowadays are the first kids to ever grow up in a digital age and the first kids to grow up in an age when communication was so easy. I would argue that it is not all the Kids fault, its the parents and the community around them. Our community today is pessimistic and our news broadcasts dont constantly full of terrorist attacks and riots and spreading divisons in the community. That is why parents try to pamper there kids when they are young to protect them from the world, but that backfires and causes the kid to grow up a brat who thinks everyone should care for him. Also, im strongly against the everybody wins mindset that is in some sports today, because that lets kids know that they dont have to work for a reward when they are older. The children and youth are the worlds future and instead of focusing on selfish desires people should focus on teaching and raising the youth because they are the ones who are going to solve the problems and make a difference in the world. Dont not teach the youth sensitivity or violence or to hide there emotions teach the youth common sense and give them the tools needed to find the truth and creativity in the world

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

preference .......sorry dyslexia isn't fun ............;;;;;;;;

2 points

What does being a socialist have to do with this? Her argument made sense and contributed to debate. Having a prefrene of race when it comes to who you are going to have a relationship is not racist, but if you insult someone who is white a dates a black person that is racist.

1 point

just follow them back back and like every post they have and comment five times on every post... stalk the stalker fight fire with fire

1 point

I disagree, having an opinion from someone coming from a different back round will strengthen your argument will often provide more insight into the issue. And America is a global super power who gets put in trumps cabinet doesn't only affect American citizens. instead of attacking someone for there views and where they come from why do you actually listen and defend your own argument. not trying to be mean just trying to make debate better

duplicate my bad sorry

1 point

I disagree, having an opinion from someone coming from a different back round will strengthen your argument will often provide more insight into the issue. And America is a global super power who gets put in trumps cabinet doesn't only affect American citizens. instead of attacking someone for there views and where they come from why do you actually listen and defend your own argument. not trying to be mean just trying to make debate better

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

i was going to make a debate on wether you would rather be free to make you own choices or wether you would rather be secure and sacrifice some of your freedom to a government to be secure

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

im sorry out of context and for another debate my bad. i go off on tangents a lot thanks for correcting me

1 point

Im sorry if that description sounded like i was trying to elevate my self above all... im guilty of attacking aswell

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

i agree safety is worth investing in 100% im jus thinking from the perspective of a government official thats all.

personally speaking i would rather be free than secure but that is just me

1 point

Designed in America, but created in China, so it was created in China but thought of in America

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

I am not saying i support either pro death penalty or pro rehabilitation, but rehabilitation may cost a government more money in dealing with someone who already broke the law. the death penalty would be more efficient i guess, but debatable on wether that is right. i am not saying that is right or wrong just giving food for the thought

2 points

First off i agree with that have said i am all for politically incorrect people and i am all for removing sin from ones life and not compromising with what you believe in. I am not trying to elevate my self above you by saying i am a good Christian, because thats a tad bit prideful. However, i do not like how when you "preach to the people on this website that you do it out of arrogance and elevate yourself above everything and claim to not be affected by world things. you are a sinner just as all of man kind ever since Adam and eve you are no different than me or anyone else on this website, so instead of being hypocritical why dont you take a dose of this thing called humbleness. I debating this website i realize not everyone is christian and that i probably cannot change there arguments because they are as stubborn as an ox. Therefore, i keep my Christian values in mind when forming arguments and stay true to my beliefs when debating, but i dont force others against there will to do so also. Christians must be within the community, but with God. Lastly answering your question. yes i can say with 100% certainty i am sinner redeemed by christ and i am going the heaven and the new earth when i die. Ps. not trying to attack you because you are a Christian i think that we should try to be more humble and correct each other and i put you down as an enemy because you bully people in debates snd im not a fan of that

1 point

Tea is the best especially in the morning or on a rainy day while reading a book

1 point

This may be one the very very few times i agree with you instig8or

1 point

I am another rare american that doesn't like coffee, but love hot tea. Also, Basing a countries technological advancement on tea kettles after one visit is a bold move even for you Shout out loud

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

A man who has many casual sexual partners is called a douche bag and STD carrier, who fears commitment and is the living definition of infidelity. Basically a recipe for disaster.

1 point

Poverty does not cause terrorism the islamic jihad ideology causes terrorism. Although, Sharia law is the ideology that creates terrorism, and failing to see this is because our president is a people pleaser. in other word he won't Call out islamic terrorism for what is because it will offend people. In addition, he may be accused of being islamophobic, Calling a organization for what it is is by no means islamophobic, it is simply the truth.

1 point

Hellno That was a well crafted burn:) i don't think it contributed to debate much but still made me laugh:) been having a rough day so thanks

2 points

Whether you are a theist or an atheist pornography is terrible for the heart and mind. it gives the viewers a false view of what intimacy looks like. Intimacy in a relationship in not sex, intimacy is sharing feelings and literally thinking as one for the benefit of the other, and sacrificing yourself for your significant other. Sex can no doubt be involved in a relationship, but it is not the backbone to any good relationship. Pornography creates an unreal image that no man or woman can ever fulfill leading to self esteem issues and depression. Also, pornography leads to infidelity and lack of commitment in a relationship, which are two of the leading causes of divorce.

FUNMUN(127) Clarified
1 point

isn't that a quote from the declaration of independence? which is not actually law.

2 points

I think it depends on what the person's parents say follow that rule for guidance. if you are and orphan then follow the rules of your government or orphanage.

1 point

Human civilization is hypocritical from its very origins. People, will oppose something that is the opposite of what they believe, but all too often when there political party has the power they will do the same things that they opposed and be happy with it because it helps them. countless times in history this has happen, and it will happen countless time in the future. This is rather cynical, but civilization is run by greed, power, and control. Nobody is in the right and all are in the wrong. also, im guilty of this too.

1 point

In her defense she is danish,but she has the freedom to say whatever she wants and we can debate whether that is right wrong

1 point

I strongly agree that free speech means that you can say whatever you want. I can cuss at a man for wearing a shirt that i disagree with, and you are legally free to do that. My opinion on freedom of speech is that everyone and anyone has a voice and can speak their opinion, but just because you are free to say what you want doesn't mean that there won't be consequences. Also, relating to this, Safe spaces are taking away the first amendment and not allowing people to talk about certain things and i strongly agree that they should be disbanded. Also, the right wing conservatives are guilty of condemning people who disagree with them... we are all a bunch of hypocrites screaming at each other trying to prove the other is more of a hypocrit

1 point

making no sense and not even debating... suits you well robotdebater


1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]