The opposite of skinny is fat. So, in your logic, a person who is not skinny must be fat. Is there no middle ground?
Atheism:
The belief that there was nothing and nothing happened to nothing and then nothing magically exploded for no reason , creating everything and then a bunch of everything magically rearranged itself for no reason whatsoever into self-replicating bits which then turned into dinosaurs.
Makes perfect sense.
The first reason is misbehaving students don’t care if others are punished for their actions. Actually, they prefer it. It means that they don’t have to suffer alone. So, in all honesty, this is ineffective.
The second reason is collective punishment gives students a reason to misbehave. If you know you’re going to get punished for showing up in in the classroom, then why don’t you break some rules? I mean, you’re going to get punished anyway, where is the incentive to behave?
The third reason is collective punishment damages the relationship between the teacher and the well-behaved students. Even if they choose to behave instead of misbehave, they will still feel the sting of injustice. They know the consequence is not only unfair, but unjust. Of course, these students will resent the real culprits, but they will resent the teacher more.
It is cruel and ineffective. Animals don't get a lot of the diseases humans get, so it doesn't matter if a product works on animals.
Look at him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Way too spicy. I draw the line at PEPPERoni. Anything else is too spicy. But that's just my opinion.
No, they should not go outside if it's below freezing or really hot, but when it's 45 degrees and teachers are keeping kids inside, it's just crazy. Kids need time to play outside.
It depends on which law you're thinking about breaking. If a law goes against your moral values, then it is perfectly acceptable to break it.
Hold on...Liberals don't support Trump, Republicans do, so how can liberals be responsible?
The first reason is misbehaving students don’t care if others are punished for their actions. Actually, they prefer it. It means that they don’t have to suffer alone. So, in all honesty, this is ineffective.
The second reason is collective punishment gives students a reason to misbehave. If you know you’re going to get punished for showing up in in the classroom, then why don’t you break some rules? I mean, you’re going to get punished anyway, where is the incentive to behave?
The third reason is collective punishment damages the relationship between the teacher and the well-behaved students. Even if they choose to behave instead of misbehave, they will still feel the sting of injustice. They know the consequence is not only unfair, but unjust. Of course, these students will resent the real culprits, but they will resent the teacher more.
The final reason is, if I am not mistaken, the goal of punishment is to correct and redirect the actions of those who are in the wrong. If so, then what is the goal of punishing those who didn’t do anything wrong? Is it to correct and redirect the actions of those who are in the right? To teach them to misbehave? Is this really what you are striving for?
One strategy is to pull out the misbehaving students. If it is possible to differentiate between the behaving and misbehaving students, do so. What you can do is pull those who are misbehaving aside, and launch into a variant of a “disappointed lecture”. After that, resume the activity. If the misbehavior continues, increase punishments as seems fit.
Another strategy is to write names. It may sound simple, but it works. Use a whiteboard, and whenever you see somebody misbehaving, write their name down. If the misbehavior continues, then write tallies for increased punishments. At the end of class, call everybody with their name written on the whiteboard up, and punish them accordingly.
The first reason is misbehaving students don’t care if others are punished for their actions. Actually, they prefer it. It means that they don’t have to suffer alone. So, in all honesty, this is ineffective.
The second reason is collective punishment gives students a reason to misbehave. If you know you’re going to get punished for showing up in a classroom, then why don’t you break some rules? I mean, you’re going to get punished anyway, where is the incentive to behave?
The third reason is collective punishment damages the relationship between the teacher and the well-behaved students. Even if they choose to behave instead of misbehave, they will still feel the sting of injustice. They know the consequence is not only unfair, but unjust. Of course, these students will resent the real culprits, but they will resent the teacher more.
The final reason is, if I am not mistaken, the goal of punishment is to correct and redirect the actions of those who are in the wrong. If so, then what is the goal of punishing those who didn’t do anything wrong? Is it to correct and redirect the actions of those who are in the right? To teach them to misbehave? Is this really what you are striving for?
No, they should not. People are who they are for a reason. They should not go about changing that.
