Hold on, let's come back to reality. Falsely submitted? Jesus Christ, man! She has an endless list of scandals, many of which are directly fueled by her actions. She potentially committed treason, but we don't know for sure because she deleted 33,000 emails after receiving a subpoena.
Don't defend her. She's so blatantly corrupt that she seems like a movie character. It's unreal. If you want to debate who is better for the future of our nation, fine, but arguing that she is not corrupt is idiotic and lacks common sense.
Hell if I know! It's all just a bunch of speculation fueled by leftist media. There's no proof of him being racist. I mean, the dude said he wanted Oprah to be his running mate. As for Mexicans, not all Mexicans are illegal. He's anti-illegal immigrants (that fucking bastard!) and Muslims, well, they're problematic, let's be honest.
So he went from working for Fox News to not working for Fox News, and instead working for Trump? CNN employees are working for Clinton while still employed with CNN.
Watch Fox News (I know you don't), and then watch CNN. Fox News is much less biased this election. Sure, they're anti-Hillary (I'm anti-criminal as well), but they are not necessarily pro-Trump.
Horrible analogy. Trump himself is outside of the political establishment, but he'll be working alongside experienced politicians.
Here's a better analogy: You have a newcomer surrounded by experienced dentists, who thinks he can fix your teeth. Then you have a dentist with a lousy track record, who has faced one dental scandal after another. Do you choose the dentist with the clean sheet, or the one with a history of fuck ups?
What you got is somebody who aspires to be a great dentist, and then somebody who should have been banned from the dental field, yet seeks a promotion.
That's a silly argument. They're a conservative network. They wanted a conservative candidate. Trump was not the most conservative candidate, but now he is officially the Republican candidate. It's ridiculous for them not to support him at this point.
Fox News does not hide the fact that they are a right-wing network. They actually pride themselves on the fact that they are the only one.
During this race, no. Fox News was largely anti-Trump until recently. They do still question much of what Trump says, and they do not fake the presidential polls that they feature on their network. They also are the only network reporting on the wikileaks emails, which contain some very important information, such as the collusion between the MSM and Clinton's camp. Because of those emails, we have proof that CNN is corrupt, and if you don't like using the word 'corrupt', then you should be able to admit that they are playing dirty. They are using their position as a news network to brainwash viewers into supporting their agenda, and that of an individual who has no business influencing the media.
Meh, my college semi-liberal hippy days are behind me.
I think we have gotten a good look at the massive political corruption and MSM bias this election, and like it or not, Trump had a lot to do with bringing that to light. We've learned just how dirty the establishment is, Republican and Democrat, and we now have the opportunity to elect an individual that is outside the establishment. If we want change, he is literally are only possible option at this point. He's far from perfect, but he is the most human candidate we have probably ever seen. He's unscripted and untouched by the corruption found within the inner circles of our government. Yes, this means he does not have the political background, but a fresh start is the only way we can come anywhere close to fixing this broken system. Plus, it's not like he won't be running the nation without help.
Hillary is the embodiment of a dirty politician. It's as if she were pulled from a movie. She talks the same old talk, but comes with the added bonus of endless political scandals. Trump has scandals, but he doesn't have political scandals.
However, on top of all that... I agree with most of what Trump says, and it certainly is possible that he's full of shit and will keep none of his promises, but guarantees don't exist in any presidential race, do they? We can't say that Clinton will fulfill more promises than Trump, unless we're psychic, but we can consider how genuine they seem, and personally, I think the guy who funds most of his own campaign and does not rely on a script comes across much more reliable than a multi-millionaire who can't remember her own policies without preparing and does not put any of her millions of dollars into her own campaign.
Are you aware of the gem that is Hillary Clinton? She's a fantastic actress, you should check out some of her work. Her most recent performance was as "politician who gives a shit about her nation's people." Not gonna lie, it wasn't her greatest role. Not very believable. However, she played "devoted wife" pretty well, by choosing to stay with her womanizing, rapist, pedophile of a husband. If she can look past rape, she must be strong... And she really convinced us of that. Other roles include: Oblivious Politician ("'C' stands for classified?' Ha! Classic!), Politician with Pneumonia, Politician who was inspired by the film Lincoln, Politician who accidentally deleted a shit ton of emails, Politician who likes Obama, and many many more. Actually, now that I think about it... She was totally unconvincing in all of those roles, but she's definitely devoted to her craft.
Most Hillary supporters seem to think they're intellectuals, even though they're not. They are the embodiment of the know-it-all teen, despite the fact that most of them are adults. But more importantly, they are brainwashed. I don't like saying that about Americans, but they are. Otherwise, why would they support a scripted politician whose personal beliefs contradict her public "beliefs, who shit-talks a man for being a womanizer while remaining married to a womanizer herself. She has been involved in numerous scandals, some of which carried the possibility of prison time (for treason of all things). She also accepts millions of dollars from foreign powers and others for giving speeches, yet despite being wealthy beyond most peoples dreams, does not put any money towards her own campaign, unlike Trump who funded most of his himself.
I could go on all day about the disgusting human being that is Hillary Clinton. People who support her should truly be ashamed of themselves.
Doesn't it get exhausting trying to defend Hillary? Thirty years in politics, and yet she claims that she did not know what the "C" on classified files stood for. What, is she an idiot? Was that really her excuse? Sowwy, I dumb. Actually, that phrase is more fitting for anybody who believes her mind-numbing, pneumonia-inducing, bullshit excuses. I haven't received much classified info in my life, but I imagine upon initial review, I'd be able to tell whether or not the info should be shared with non-authorized individuals, "C" or not.
Let's not pretend she is a good candidate. She's not. She's probably the most scandalous candidate of your lifetime, and certainly mine... Although, her husband was pretty scandalous, with his impeachment and whatnot.
