And none of them have the government or the proletariat running companies or owning the means of production
Actually, all of those countries use socialised healthcare systems, and most of them have socialised higher education. Iceland has even socialised the banks!
"OF COURSE YOU CAN HAVE CANNONS! You are allowed to defend yourself and your property!"
There is a real problem in your country. If you can't differentiate between a weapon and a shield then, by the same logic, if Muslims were responsible for 9/11 (which they weren't, I'm just giving an example) they would have only been "defending" themselves from American aggression.
Funny how all the rules change when you're the victims.
when it's YOU denying my DNA test
Oh, what a surprise. More LIES from the LIAR. It is SCIENCE which is "denying" your "DNA test", you obnoxious 75 year old halfwit.
DNA ancestry tests branded 'meaningless'
Commercial DNA tests that claim to tell people whether they are related to Richard III or descended from the Vikings are no more than "genetic astrology", scientists have warned.
Get help, you delusional prick.
JEW why is it your party opposes your homeland ?????????????
Nobody of any moral integrity can deny the threat posed to world peace by Israel, which only illustrates that Republicans lack moral integrity. Israel is a terrorist apartheid state and a theocracy.
Palestinians (who are Muslims) and Israelis (who are Jews) share the exact same genetic roots to the indigenous peoples of the region. Mislabelling one of those groups a race is therefore an attempt from one religion to establish dominance over the other.
It is not about who is socially responsible, rather at what point do we reasonably expect a person to become personally responsible, independent, etc.?
But this is a contradiction of itself buddy. If you "reasonably expect a person to become socially responsible" by a specific age then you simultaneously are determining who should be socially responsible (i.e. those people above that age). If you refuse to acknowledge that there are many other factors involved other than age then I can't really help you. You seem to be relying upon it as the solitary determinant of a person's social responsibility.
You do not think a 35 year old has a responsibility to establish independence before or upon reaching that age?
I do not think age is a determinant in deciding who is socially responsible, period. Where do autistic people feature in your rather Machiavellian analysis? Or those with depression? Schizophrenia? You are attempting to generalise and oversimplify something which is really quite complicated and specific to the individual involved.
What free will is not is action without cause.
Forgive me but why the fk are you telling us this? I've read through this entire thread and nobody has claimed free will is action without cause. Nom is right. Nothing you say makes any sense.
At what age do you believe "personal ownership" kicks in? Does 35 sound fair enough?
Dude, I know 35 year olds who still live with their folks. Different people mature at different rates. I'm also not completely sure what you mean by "personal ownership". If you're talking about ownership of responsibility then if it isn't your fault it isn't your fault, regardless of your age. If you mean it literally as ownership of personal property then I believe you should be able to own things regardless of age, so again the difference is the same.
You can most certainly provide a general assessment based on age
But people aren't general. They are specific individuals with specific circumstances. Age has nothing to do with those circumstances. You might just as well claim that hair colour "most certainly provides a general assessment". You are talking nonsense.
I agree with what you said, except for the age range you specified. A 28 year old has a fully developed brain (in so far as it managed to develop, that is), and has some real life experience under their belt at that point.
Wtf? You can't judge a person based on just their age. The 28 year old who left home at 16 to travel the world has as much "life experience" as the 28 year old who never left the nest? You can't make rash generalisations about people based on just their age. That's really rather silly, in fact.
