CreateDebate


JOMIRO's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of JOMIRO's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

'DNA proves programming....God is the programmer.'

How does DNA prove programming? Why do you believe that?

1 point

'DNA proves programming....God is the programmer.'

How does DNA prove programming? Why do you believe that?

1 point

You are presuming too much here. I am not judgemental or bigotted at all. I will put forward my findings as they appear to me. I may completely disagree with you or I may be of a similar belief in some areas, and I will fight for your right to believe anything you want to.

I am very open-minded and I tolerate many things, and when I want complete and honest answers from people I push hard enough to elicit their responses in full. We gain more from answers that are given with enthusiasm and emotion attached rather than dull, flat, unimaginative replies. That would be boring and we would not stretch each other very far.

I would like to discuss this subject further and I welcome any contribution you have to offer if it is given freely and in earnest, but you also have the right to be the lofty and condescending one too. The choice is yours. One way opens it all up and makes available all avenues. The other closes it down and brings communication to an end.

2 points

I believe that organised religion is faulted right from the start. Apart from the fact that those involved are supporting nothing more than fairy tales at best, they create a community based on rank and position within that community. The practitioners in these orders are promoted and their status becomes more and more important to them. They all spend far too much time trying to outdo each other to gain favour with the leaders. It quickly and not surprisingly becomes a full-blown cult.

If you are going to take part in one of these ridiculous faith-based religions why not try to find one where the significance of rank does not matter. There must be a few still around like that somewhere.

1 point

You say,'I am not here trying to judge any woman who has had an abortion.', but that is exactly what you have done from the very start. You have accused those who have been defiled by rapists and implied that they have no right to rid themselves of the unwanted abominations that have been left inside them. (You would feel no different if you were in the same condition)

Pro-choice people may not always agree on when a termination should be carried out or fully concur about cut off points and time frames, but they will always come together over the whole issue of choice.

Did the victim of the rape have a choice at the time it was committed?

It seems to me that the only one you want to have a choice here is the rapist. Lives are destroyed every day because of murder, suicide, wars and terrorism, euthanasia, neglect of all sorts, poverty and hunger. Do you, I wonder, bother to raise an eyebrow for those lives or do you spend your days banging only this drum?

1 point

Only a Fool say God does not exist What nonsense is this and who are you to decide who is a fool?

Even Science say God Exist Science, to my knowledge, has never claimed that any god exists.

Everything is So structure What structure are you looking at? There is no obvious structure to any of it as far as I can see.

Just because you've given an answer, it doesn't mean a thing. Especially when it is pure unadulterated nonsense of the highest order.

1 point

Jesus of Nazareth is a fictional character, and no more than that can be proved at all.

1 point

And you offer no explanation at all either way. How clever that is.

1 point

Most people want the proof, but there is none. No-one has ever provided any and you can not do that either.

1 point

The character of 'Jesus of Nazareth', and I purposely use the word character, is exactly that. He is a made up person who carries a heavy bundle of made up stories, tales and hearsay squarely on his imaginary shoulders. The character is the same as 'Robin Hood', and is a way of writing all of these stories in one smartly bound edition of fairy tales. There has never been any convincing evidence that this character was ever a real person, or that any of the stories were ever proved to have happened.

None of this ever really happened, and added to that that there is not even any proof that the so-called writers of these tales ever existed either.

1 point

Nostradamus's predictions have, probably, been twisted and contorted more than any others to suit those who wanted to be right about something they believed in.

1 point

I agree that this 'William Lane Craig' is a hair's breadth away from total lunacy, and when you see him debate you can not help hating the guy. You have to stop watching so that you can calm down enough to not want to slap him across the face with a stocking full of shite. Atheism is, by far, the most logical stance.

1 point

No. They do not exist, and those that claim to be clairvoyant are trying to deceive you. Worse still, are those who actually believe that they are gifted in that way because their enthusiasm for it will convince others more easily. They should be stopped.

1 point

No. We are not the creation of a divine being. There is no divine being.

1 point

What is being fed to the gullible is a belief in a god. There is no evidence of it and there has never been. For someone to speculate about the existence of aliens is still a little fanciful, but it is far closer to the realms of reality and reason than religious nonsense. If aliens have been observing this world they have seen us place our feet firmly on the path to destruction, and they have abandoned us to it. If life in the universe is as prolific as suggested by certain calculations we are no great loss. I am semi supporting the argument by saying that it is possible that we have been seen.

2 points

We must stamp out this 'Politically Correct' malarkey because a generation of people has emerged who really do believe that it is a real thing. They have been brainwashed from birth, and have been conned into accepting and adopting an anti-social concept, which can be mischievous at very least, or entirely evil when coupled with intent.

Political correctness, is a way for those bereft of wit and intelligence, to prevent us from saying what we mean in words that are easily understood. It is a cold, calculated and perfidious attempt to disrupt normality. The idiots who support it would have us believe that their cause is a just one too, but it is not. Only the warped, deluded and malicious machinations of the criminally insane could possibly adhere to such a doctrine in all seriousness.

It is a total corruption of logic, morality and reason, designed to have your thoughts remain trapped inside your head, and have you unable to express them as opinion, belief or truth. It offers no latitude to eloquence, creativity or imagination; it seeks only to confound, stifle and confuse, which is extremely amusing if you consider, as I do, that it usually comes from the minds of the mentally bewildered.

However, the practice of this dark art does reveal, of its exponents, certain psychopathic tendencies, which hopefully, will be offered up to public ridicule because they must truly believe themselves better and above everyone else.

My suggestion, for dealing with political correctness, is to shove it right up the very arse of its originator as soon as it appears, and if they are 'offended' by that, they can simply 'Go away.'

1 point

How ridiculous. We are here because we are, and there is no other reason. God my arse.

2 points

First of all, I would like to say that you just said some incredibly stupid things.

Religion is not necessary for society to function at all, and why would it 'enable' someone to form 'certain values' when they are perfectly capable of doing that by themselves?

Then you say that people can find 'rational and logical' explanations to things like 'why we're on Earth'. That is one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever heard. If religion can offer one single solitary explanation that is founded in anything other than fantasy and fairytales I am yet to hear it.

How could anyone who believes in the god you are speaking of possibly feel optimistic when all that allegedly comes from it is nonsense.

0 points

A nice little video if you are of a Christian persuasion, and for those who are easily swayed it could be a decider. However, it does not present anything new or untold, and the only claim is the same old story that all of these 'special conditions' must be the work of an intelligent designer or god.

It only leaves you, at the end of the day, with the overwhelming sense that everything we know is balanced on a cosmic knife edge, and we still do not know how or why. Is it by design or is it a happy coincidence waiting to be proven by being repeated elsewhere in the universe?

An atheist or a devout believer could equally fight their corner as a result of this video, and the agnostics could probably watch it over and over again, so it will be loads of fun for them.

There have been no earth shattering discoveries or revelations made here.

2 points

As everyone knows, there is no god. Therefore, it is mankind who places these so called sins on the heads of others. Sin began with men blaming other men for things they disagreed about.

1 point

If that young person is capable of looking after a child there should be no problem. Is someone trying to say that teenaged boys are not capable or that they are not to be trusted in another sense? If you take this at the face value the answer should be yes. Any more argument there is for another debate in its own right.

1 point

You can be a good person and brag about the good things you did. If you do a good thing and then brag about it you do not automatically turn bad.

1 point

There is and never has been any proof of the existence of a god.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]