CreateDebate


JakeLad's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of JakeLad's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Catholic vs Protestant, Christians vs Muslims Jews vs Muslims, left vs right, black vs white and so we can observe that history continues to repeat itself and nothing has changed since the dawn of mankind.

"Blacks, Whites, Christians, and Muslims have been fighting since before each concept was invented or constructed."

Classic historicism.

1 point

Then you have me, dedicated liberal

Please get over yourself. Two composition fallacies don't make you any less incorrect.

1 point

Biden supporters aren't leftists, they're neocons and neolibs. But it is fun as it is to see two groups of retards fight over which one of their backward presidential candidates is better than the other.

0 points

Eurocuck moment. If you didn't want all the ignorant Ameicans from the South coming to your country and giving you second hand embarrassment you shouldn't have sent your racist cousin-fuckers out here to steal land and import slaves. You can recite any dead poet or reference any dead artist you want, you have absolutely dick to show for today. Take your Dr Who, gay Harry Potter and overplayed Beatles songs and blow it out your ass. You can go on about Orange Man and MacDonalds all you want. It was people from your continent hopping on YouTube to defend trump for owning the libs and floating Godemporor trump ballons. Not to mention, there isn't a single nation on your continent that doesn't have a McDonalds. Go eat sheep's cock.

0 points

That was guilt money paid over not getting involved in the war earlier

Inadvertently admitting that your continent cannot defend itself from a bunch of meatheads without us.

Sure thing which is why yanks relied on Euros to supply them with slaves

The scramble for Africa happened after the Civil War. Are you retarded or just historically inept?

“Cousin fucking” this from a rube from the south where interbreeding is seen as a norm

Here in the Pacific States, we resent the south because it got all it's culture, namely cousin-fucking, extreme racism, and uncultured taste in entertainment from you euro fucks. It's whole lineage is derived from European Aristocrats, slaveowners and settlers. Your disgusting culture has manifested itself as the tumor that is the South. Clearly I was wrong about free higher education if you are all this stupid.

1 point

Ha you’re hilarious the US rebuilt Europe

Yes. It was called the Marshall Plan.

Vietnam kicked your burger chomping army of fatties back to your slave loving racist shit hole of a gun crazy country

Euros had their asses ravaged by men with bows and spears multiple times in Africa. Namely Ethiopia. But go on about how your culture of cousin-fucking aristocrats is superior to that of the American South.

0 points

You're seriously the kind of pompous chauvinistic euro who thinks every state is exactly like Texas. Your culture is needing the US and the Soviets to rebuild your shithole continent out of the ashes of WW2 because you're all to racist and stupid to do it youself.

1 point

But you denied this yesterday like the dumb American fuck you are you lied when you said the main reason was for hunting

0.005% is much much more narrow than 1/7th. That statement, which is the statement I made earlier is true. Are you incapable of doing basic math?

American “culture” 🤣🤣🤣 yeah sure, Big Macs, obesity and action movies .......” culture “

You are an ignorant parody of yourself. I don't know what kind of slav, kraut, froggy, mick, pretzel-maker, wop, or racist country you come from but it changes nothing. You're a fucking euro.

2 points

Jesus this is the stupidest thing I've heard so far. If people want to use it for self defense then there's no problem, especially since they NEED them if they live in an agricultural community. Regardless you're asking that 72 million Americans shed their rights to own a gun because a maximum of 0.005% (roughly 20,000) have used them and it costed a human life. I clearly need no education from an ignorant limey Eurocuck who has no understanding of my history, culture, or country. Have fun in your padded cell of an island lobsterback.

1 point

Nice going implying that all guns do is kill people and that there's no other application of guns. No hunting, no sports, nothing.

0 points

Guns are much more widely used for hunting and sport in the US. You argue that gun accidents, suicide, and homicides are a reason to ban guns would be banned when a maximum of .002% of all gun ownership causes gun violence and .005�count for gun deaths. It seems like overkill to just outright ban them.

1 point

You just contradicted yourself. Do you seriously think people will just willy-nilly go to jail and have their guns confiscated? Is that not "trying to disarm" them? It is incredible how you can call me an idiot and then directly contradict yourself in the same breath.

0 points

Ah, the Eurocentrist circlejerk has arrived. I don't expect either of you to understand why trying to disarm 72 million Americans could cause an incredible amount of instability at best and an all-out civil war at worst. especially when gun crime is marginal compared to the sheer number of gun owners. You literally are asking for something that is not feasible in the current cultural climate. Whether it would solve any problems or not seems to be the least of your concerns. See what happens when you try to disarm places like Oregon or Texas, it won't go over well.

0 points

The situational irony is incredibly huge on your part. If you don't like the logic of that statement then stop using it.

1 point

Car accidents and the deliberate striking of pedestrians wouldn't be possible without cars. But it doesn't make sense to ban cars, does it?

1 point

You're asking me to trust a Wikipedia article citing a Politician, which has a 404'd footnote link. Not to mention the fact that they could just get their guns from someone who would be willing to distribute them. Y'know like China or Russia, two nations infamous for selling weapons in the interest of destabilizing their enemies. So even if you could disarm the American people, now you have a disarmed population and a highly militarized criminal syndicate.

1 point

It seems to have helped because you haven't come up with a solid argument yet. All you've done is gotten red in the face and called me an idiot. You've demonstrated you have no understanding of American culture, the American political system, geopolitical black market forces, and the applications of Rohypnol.

1 point

That makes 0 sense. Being small and "easy to manage" doesn't affect whether someone decides to go out and use their access to firepower to try and kill other people. That and gun control is incredibly lenient if there even is any. If anything Switzerland makes a point of militarizing its population and even has a mandatory military service period.

0 points

Just like the way it is in Switzerland. A high population of gun owners and near to no mass shootings.

1 point

But the fact that they come here illegally only allows employers to treat them incredibly poor, subject them to 3rd-world working conditions, and give them little to no pay. They are complacent to these conditions under threat of deportation. They cannot go to the authorities about their poor working conditions because they would just be deported. We need to improve foreign workers' rights and make it much easier to cross the border in order to eliminate the need to illegally immigrate while still securing the border.

1 point

The drug lords and human traffickers are still an issue and they constantly victimize immigrant families trying to cross the border illegally. If we made it easy to legally cross the border we'd make them harder to victimize and traffick them. And we definitely need to improve foreign workers' rights or something because the fact that we treat foreign workers like second-class laborers and give them 3rd-world payment for their toils creates a disparity in the job market that ultimately harms the entire working class.

1 point

The law itself has no value. Laws require legitimacy to be enforced in the first place, and a law can't be enforced without causing more problems, it shouldn't be a law. The speed limit law for example is the most commonly broken law. Some cops don't even enforce speed limits because they don't believe it's a legitimate or worthwhile law to enforce, they just keep an eye out for reckless drivers. I do agree with you that we should prioritize legal immigration, but we should focus on changing the law so we can mitigate all the problems it causes.

1 point

72 million Americans own guns, so all those statistics are marginal in comparison to the sheer magnitude of gun owners. It obviously isn't the guns that are causing these issues, there are several factors at play.

1 point

I gave you some links, look them over and come back. Here's one just in case you missed 'em.

https://destinationhope.com/rohypnol-club-drug-or-date-rape-drug/#:~:text=Here is a list of,level of intoxication increases exponentially.


1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]