CreateDebate


JamesDD's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of JamesDD's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

1 point

Having a problem with your attacks against gays is not heterophobia you stupid, insane, evolution-denying halfwit. I'm literally heterosexual you deeply mentally ill prick.

4 points

The bit that really gets on my nerves is how he tries to force you to read his insane 40,000 word rants. Just keep downvoting him guys.

JamesDD(11) Clarified
1 point

American cops are leaving for obvious reasons. Why are Bobbies quitting?

https://www.newswise.com/articles/walking-away-from-the-beat-why-police-officers-are-voluntarily-leaving-in-large-numbers

The article literally says why you stupid bastard.

2 points

You know Jody, this is really why I love this site so much. It's one of the few places you can go in life where you can have your morality criticised by a nonce.

2 points

You really need to work on that as it only turned to “ parody” when you were called on your racism

That's very interesting Jody, but as I seem to recall, you only left this site after you were called out on being a convicted paedophile. Am I lying about that? I don't think I am, am I?

1 point

I see you’re claiming to be black now?

Ah, dear Jody. Thank you for coming back to remind us all that you are literally too thick to understand parody even when it is spelled out for you to follow on the page. You and Dana both seem to be oblivious to parodies, only she admits she's mentally disabled. Do you admit that too? Or are you denying it?

3 points

When insecure, hateful people are losing an argument without fail they resort to personal attacks.

Hi FoamWithin. Could you maybe tell us why you are using alts to reply to your own attacks against the left?

Were you able to discern the OP argument or point?

When you say "argument or point" are you talking about the page worth of lies and personal attacks above us? The one which begins:-

The reason that so many on the Left are anti Christian Bigots, hating Trump, hating Conservatives, etc., is very easy to see.

You are one SERIOUSLY insane motherfucker, pal. You use this site exclusively to slander the left and when anybody on the left (or even the right for that matter) disagrees or argues with your abuse you ban them. Then claim victimhood.

Look, do the world a big favour and jump off something tall please. You are a dangerously mad, abusive prick who hides behind Jesus. A true scumbag of the highest order.

3 points

I was rapped twice

Oh were you? Funny, because you've never mentioned that before. You said you were raped, never mentioned it was twice, then admitted you are a virgin in a later debate.

The problem is Dana that you cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, and you are a danger to everybody you come into contact with.

2 points

He did not disprove anything. He posted a link. I posted a link refuting it.

No you didn't you insane twat. You claimed proteins can't evolve naturally. He disproved you with a scientific research paper and you linked a creationist blog which was making an entirely different argument!!!! You are seriously mentally unwell and you need to shut the fuck up. You have been disproved MULTIPLE times in this debate, by MULTIPLE different people, and you have thus far banned EVERY SINGLE PERSON who has debunked you:-

This new study from our laboratory provides the very first evidence that a protein evolved recently from scratch

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171019171650.htm

You mad little moron.

2 points

There is no evidence that these are new, spontaneous created enzymes.

OK, I see now that you are clearly unwell, simply from the fact that you have banned every single person in this debate who has argued with you. Literally open a book you retarded cunt. Educate yourself:-

This new study from our laboratory provides the very first evidence that a protein evolved recently from scratch

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171019171650.htm

You are mentally unwell and I suggest you shut up and seek the help that you need. You are wrong; everything you have written in this debate is wrong; numerous people have illustrated it, and the fact that you are still here arguing implies that you are mad.

2 points

I'm not bronto

Why do you lie so much, Bronto? Serious question. Were you fondled as a child or something?

1 point

I see you are now editing your own posts too because you are too stupid to get them right the first time. Let's have a look at these "simple questions".

You still cannot give an example of a Socialist state or indeed a Socialist, why’s that ?

That's a false claim on both counts, so ignored.

Funny Marx who invested in the stock market was a ‘real’ Socialist his buddy Engels the millionaire who mixed with lords and ladies and paid his staff minimun wage was a ‘real Socialist’ ....Hitler who overthrew the capitalist classes and sized power as Marx recommended was not a Socialist .......interesting .....

This is not a question, so ignored.

1 point

Your total collapse was anticipated

Did the voices tell you that?

I asked you two simple questions

Ask me anything you like, but if your questions are loaded or fallacious in any way I'm going to ignore them.

1 point

Ahhh right Hitler did as Marx proposed

You evidently suffer from mental health issues, Dermot.

JamesDD(11) Clarified
3 points

I KNOW what is happening in MY country, FASCISM! Ever since MY White House has been occupied by the NEW FURHER!

Damn straight. It genuinely could not be any more apparent. Not even if it were wearing a pro-fascism t-shirt. It is trying to re-brand itself of course, but anybody who was around the first time (or has simply read about it) can see what it is.

2 points

You truly need to get something through your head. You cannot win if you are factually incorrect.

You refuse to ever scrutinise the claims of Adolf Hitler (the most notorious liar in 20th century political history) because you love and cherish him as your fuhrer and believe he would never lie to you. Is that not true?

1 point

Hitler

Five times. You've used Adolf Hitler as a source five times in the last thirty minutes.

In an argument about which guy prefers Hitler.

Priceless. Just priceless.

1 point

It’s actually called boxing

No, it's called football. It must be because JamesDD said so in a speech dated July 2020. How stupid are you exactly?

1 point

Hitler

Hitler again? Interesting. Explain more to us about the intellectual credibility of Hitler. You've quoted him four times in the last thirty minutes and seem to be extremely familiar with the things he said. I personally do not know what Hitler said because alas, I am not a Nazi and have learned enough about Hitler to know he was a pathological liar.

1 point

Yes I know you’re a Nazi

So you didn't deny being a paedophile. Instead you tried to change the subject. Hmmm...

1 point

Hitler preached

Hitler preached anything which would win him votes you retarded fuck. Stop getting your information from Adolf Hitler if you want to convince any random idiot that you are something other than a fascist.

1 point

But that’s exactly what you’re saying you said

So you admit it?

Glad we got that sorted. I'm calling the police. Nazism is one thing, but I draw the line at child abuse.

1 point

You’re seriously quoting from a commie mag called Jack off bin

Merrily sources Adolf Hitler. Outraged when you source "commie mags".

The entire world facepalms.

1 point

Right so the segregation of blacks even going back to the 1960’s was just fine using your logic ?

Oh, sure buddy, that makes perfect sense. So you're saying we should just let adults have sex with children without there being legal consequences? What kind of sick bastard even thinks something like that?

1 point

Our fight is with money.

So you are openly using Adolf Hitler's own propaganda. Why would anybody take you seriously after you apparently expect us to put our faith in the claims of Adolf Hitler? Adolf Hitler claimed he wouldn't annex Czechoslovakia too, but guess what?

As I have explained to your stupid Nazi ass once already, capital in Nazi Germany outperformed capital in America during the same period, so clearly Hitler was lying when he said he was fighting against money.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/04/capitalism-and-nazism/

1 point

“exploitation” by capitalists

Oh, cool. But if Hitler was anti-capitalist, as you seem to be suggesting, can you explain how and why capital in Germany managed to outperform capital in the United States during the same period?

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/04/capitalism-and-nazism/

Indeed, can you explain how and why the Nazis actually began selling themselves on the basis of "Hitler's economic miracle"?

1 point

Nonsense, Hitler preached class warfare, agitating the working class to resist “exploitation” by capitalists , particularly Jewish capitalists, of course.

Nonsense, huh?

Nazism rejected class conflict-based socialism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Anti-communism

In Mein Kampf, Hitler stated his desire to "make war upon the Marxist principle that all men are equal."[263]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Anti-communism

Nazi ideology relied on elitism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Anti-communism

The Nazis claimed that communism was dangerous to the well-being of nations because of its intention to dissolve private property, its support of class conflict, its aggression against the middle class, its hostility towards small business and its atheism.[261]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Anti-communism

You keep telling the lies. I'll keep showing everybody that you are a liar. If that is entertaining for you (as it clearly appears to be), then awesome.

1 point

In statement after statement, Hitler could not be clearer about his socialist commitments.

Please source this claim, because it clearly is not true, as evidence from the time illustrates:-

"Why," I asked Hitler, "do you call yourself a National Socialist, since your party programme is the very antithesis of that commonly accredited to socialism?" (Interview with Adolf Hitler, George Sylvester Viereck, 1923).

https://famous-trials.com/hitler/2529-1923-interview-with-adolf-hitler

So, as early as 1923, the world was already aware that Hitler was not a socialist. But apparently in 2020 the right knows less than the world did in 1923. You have to credit that level of absurd stupidity with a whistle. You actually know less than people living a full century earlier than you. Concrete evidence that the American far right is actually devolving rather than evolving.

1 point

and said he was putting what Marx theorised about into action

Ahahahaha!!! He declared war against class conflict you ridiculous imbecile. Explain how making socialism illegal in Germany and imprisoning the socialists in concentration camps was "putting what Marx theorised about into action"!!!

You are stupid beyond the point of complete absurdity.

1 point

So Hitler banned National Socialism Wow !!!!

Hitler invented his own form of extreme far right fascism (essentially state capitalism, since that is what the Nazi regime was) and called it National Socialism.

If I invent a game where we punch each other in the face until one of us falls over and I call that game "aggressive football", is it football?

1 point

Suck it up son Hitler acknowledged his debt to Marx

Lol. Hitler dedicated his entire adult life to exterminating Marxism you absurd child. He despised it just like you despise it, and told lies about it just like you are telling lies about it.

What you twats on the extreme far right never understand is that, contrary to your words, the facts of what physically happened expose your bullshit for what it is.

1 point

I mean, it isn't as if I don't have respect for the extremity of the deception. Using Nazi propaganda from the 1930s to promote the idea that the enemies of the Nazis are the "real Nazis". But it is wearing thin now. Everybody who has had an education understands what you are doing, and since it is as nauseating as it is dishonest, you're going to repulse just as many voters as you gain from it.

1 point

Did you know the local Socialists / Nazis

If you open any history book in the entire world it will tell you that Hitler banned socialism, imprisoned the socialists and dedicated his entire life to exterminating Marxism.

"In the years 1913 and 1914 I expressed my opinion for the first time in various circles, some of which are now members of the National Socialist Movement, that the problem of how the future of the German nation can be secured is the problem of how Marxism can be exterminated."[108]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PoliticalviewsofAdolfHitler#Anti-communism

In Mein Kampf, Hitler stated his desire to "make war upon the Marxist principle that all men are equal."[263]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Anti-communism

During the 1920s, Hitler urged disparate Nazi factions to unite in opposition to Jewish Bolshevism.[266] Hitler asserted that the "three vices" of "Jewish Marxism" were democracy, pacifism and internationalism.[267] The Communist movement, the trade unions, the Social Democratic Party and the left-wing press were all considered to be Jewish-controlled and part of the "international Jewish conspiracy" to weaken the German nation by promoting internal disunity through class struggle.[57]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Anti-communism

You keep repeating the exact same ridiculous bullshit over and over and over again, just like the Nazis did.

JamesDD(11) Clarified
2 points

Most of the Democrat/left wing controlled cities are in a state of uncontrolled lawlessness.

Translation: Please approve my plan to create a new police force called the SS which will control and punish this leftist lawlessness.

The world has heard it all before you pitiful Nazi fuck. You're a Nazi, and by virtue of that fact nothing you ever say is true. You seek only to attack while at the same time you demand a monopoly on victimhood.

Scumbag.

1 point

You will always be Mr Angry to me

And you will always be my cherished stepson.

Even if it is only by virtue of the fact that I used to regularly bugger your mum like a rabbit on meth.

1 point

I don’t need one

An elementary education?

I don’t even live in the US

I busted you for that lie 6 months ago when I pointed out that you write in American English. The place where you claim to be from (i.e. Ireland) writes in British English.

The thing I've noticed that everybody on the far right appears to have in common is that they are all really massive fucking liars. Any idea why that might be?

1 point

Genetics

Still raging, huh? I know a guy who can get you some Valium. Your blood pressure seems quite high.

1 point

I know how did I miss this every hot chick loves a bearded unemployed wretch

Nah, they prefer corrupt billionaire paedophiles who use their wealth and power to trick them into their homes where they can rape them.

https://www.courthousenews.com/rape-allegations-refiled-against-trump/

Any explanation why you voted for a paedophile rapist?

1 point

But you’re doing it with Lincoln you dummy WTF

Of course, because I needed to illustrate the fallacy with the use of an example.

Incredible that you choose to spend your time like this.

1 point

you said Jews didn’t exist

Why are you so stupid? Do you have an explanation?

1 point

Did you hear about the Socialist with a job? ....no ......neither did I

Yeah, socialists are too busy smoking joints and getting laid to work. It's such a tough life...

1 point

Marx on Jews in a famous essay you’ve once again never read

You are very repetitive. I've already illustrated that you are committing a fallacy. You are taking people out of the times in which they lived and judging them by today's standards, which is a common fallacy the right likes to use when appealing to emotion and myth. Unfortunately, the right never seems to realise that it can be done right back to them. They are stupid like that:-

Lincoln with additional reasons why the Negroes should be colonized. Our republican system was meant for a homogeneous people, he declared; as long as the Negroes continued to live with the whites they would constitute a threat to the national life. Family life might also collapse and the increase of "the mixed breed bastards," might some day challenge the supremacy of the white man.

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/a/alajournals/0599998.0006.003?view=text&seq=40

The sad thing is that knowing Lincoln was a raging racist actually makes him MORE of a hero to your dumb Nazi ass. Lol.

1 point

You dumb Ox

Why are you so angry? Why don't you calm down and go have a nice cup of tea and some strudel, you hilarious Nazi idiot?

1 point

Afraid Science and History is against your there Holocaust denier

On the contrary, in keeping with every single claim you ever make, this is the exact opposite of true:-

The Invention of the Jewish People is a study of the historiography of the Jewish people by Shlomo Sand, Professor of History at Tel Aviv University.

Sand began his work by looking for research studies about forcible exile of Jews from the area now bordered by modern Israel, and its surrounding regions. He was astonished that he could find no such literature, he says, given that the expulsion of Jews from the region is viewed as a constitutive event in Jewish history. The conclusion he came to from his subsequent investigation is that the expulsion simply did not happen, that no one exiled the Jewish people from the region, and that the Jewish diaspora is essentially a modern invention. He accounts for the appearance of millions of Jews around the Mediterranean and elsewhere as something that came about primarily through the religious conversion of local people, saying that Judaism, contrary to popular opinion, was very much a "converting religion" in former times. He holds that mass conversions were first brought about by the Hasmoneans under the influence of Hellenism, and continued until Christianity rose to dominance in the fourth century CE.[18]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TheInventionoftheJewish_People

Genetic markers cannot determine Jewish descent

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301023/

1 point

Is this the same reason you deny the Holocaust ?

Marxists were the first people into Hitler's concentration camps you stupid Nazi cunt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firsttheycame_...

1 point

Right , so the correspondence between Marx and Engels

That isn't what you posted you laughably dishonest Nazi imbecile. The very first sentence of what you posted accuses Marx of being racist against his own race. You're literally a stupid Nazi liar.

3 points

Neither does Communism.

Yes it does. I have a feeling you are about to be banned yet again for vote manipulation, using puppet accounts to circumvent a ban and Nazi propaganda.

1 point

I provided you a link with that exact answer.

No you didn't. You provided a link which said the FBI also suspects Flynn's son is a criminal, and are somehow trying to make people believe that means Flynn isn't a criminal. Obviously, anybody with the intelligence of a three year old child can see that you are twisting the facts.

1 point

Actually it's a group of words put together by left wing media

Actually, you tell lies and then link drop articles which contradict your own lies. That's why you never quote the parts of the articles which support your lies. Because they never do. You search Google for misleading headlines and then just dump the headlines because that's the insufferably dishonest little ratbag piece of shit you are.

1 point

All of the links come to his defense

Like this one?

Don’t Forget, Michael Flynn Pleaded Guilty. Twice.

Even President Trump has said his former national security adviser lied to the F.B.I.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/07/opinion/michael-flynn-charges-dropped.html

Every single word which ever leaves your lips is a lie. You are a walking, talking piece of shit.

1 point

Its amazing how thousands of biologists can come to a conclusion, and yet pro-choicers will twist it into a denial of their very conclusions!

That's literally what you've just done you insane dope. Your passage says, in crystal clear terms that a five year old could grasp, that a fetus is developing into a human.

1 point

Caterpillars develop into butterflies, but until they become butterflies they are still caterpillars. What the hell is so difficult to comprehend about that, dummy?

2 points

DEVELOPMENT does not begin until after FERTILIZATION, because prior to fertilization it is not a human being.

If it hasn't DEVELOPED into a human being yet then it ISN'T a human being, is it, you stupid, delusional twit?

JamesDD(11) Clarified
1 point

By the way, if you launch into personal attacks instead of reasoning

You are the one who is not reasoning you delusional halfwit. You are making arbitrary statements of fact, calling it science and then posting passages which contradict you. This is exactly why arguing with religious people is pointless. Whatever is black you will say is white. You're contradicting yourself, contradicting the sources you post which are supposed to corroborate you, and literally just sitting there turning factual reality upside down.

JamesDD(11) Clarified
2 points

He told me. He was very in-depth about it too

That's great. So your evidence is the word of a guy who claims to be in communication with aliens and who believes the world is flat?

Can you see why Burrito is right? Yours are not the thought processes of an intelligent person. I notice that you also banned Burrito for asking you to support your claims. Again, not the behaviour of an intelligent person.

Both me and him are verifiably more intelligent than average.

Verifiable by you telling us that you are more intelligent that average?

I'm afraid that an intelligent person would recognise immediately that this is not verification. This is opinion.

Also, it's "he and I", not "me and him".

2 points

Reported, for abuse.

Proving that you are wrong is not abuse. Just a heads up.

2 points

The term "National Socialism" arose out of attempts to create a nationalist redefinition of "socialism", as an alternative to both Marxist international socialism and free market capitalism. Nazism rejected the Marxist concepts of class conflict and universal equality, opposed cosmopolitan internationalism, and sought to convince all parts of the new German society to subordinate their personal interests to the "common good"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

Sound familiar? It should, because this fake left which Hitler invented in order to pull in Communist voters and consolidate power for himself is EXACTLY what the lying American right tries to convince ordinary Americans is the real left. They do this because they are of course cut from the exact same cloth as the Nazis themselves. Evil, narcissistic liars who care only about strength and power.

1 point

Would you like some more facts, you filthy Nazi pig? I have plenty of them.

The party was renamed the National Socialist German Workers' Party—to attract workers away from left-wing parties

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

Now why don't you go right ahead and quote us some Joseph Goebbels like you usually do in this situation, scumbag.

1 point

Holocause survivors have compared the left to Nazi Germany. Point?

Here's his point, you lying Nazi scumbag:-

The National Socialist German Workers' Party commonly referred to in English as the Nazi Party was a FAR RIGHT political party in Germany

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaziParty

Any particular reason why you are turning historical facts upside down?

1 point

Which word are you talking about? Sophistry? I have known and used that word since before I even knew you

Yeah, but see your problem is that you're a liar. You copy Nom all day long. The moment he started posting his music up here you started mumbling into your laptop microphone. You want to compete with him but you are too stupid to understand how far he is above your level.

2 points

The constitution and bill of rights are a classical liberal concept

We know, but that isn't relevant because that isn't the statement you agreed with. The statement you agreed with was:-

To believe that EVERYBODY is endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, is a VERY liberal concept

To which you replied:-

It's a very classical liberal concept, I'll give you that.

I wonder if you could explain to everybody how pretending the word "creator" wasn't a part of the statement you agreed with is going to help convince anybody that you aren't a completely stupid idiot.

JamesDD(11) Clarified
1 point

I strongly suspect we are not alone, yet I don't believe in AA theory. There goes your argument.

I strongly suspect we are not alone, yet you claim I believe the Anunnaki created DNA. There comes my argument again.

Stupid, pointless little brat.

JamesDD(11) Clarified
1 point

Can you provide any argument for this that doesn't rely on your own personal experiences or already exist within UFO/AA culture?

Can you stop fraudulently suggesting every possible variation of the "we are not alone" scenario is the same thing as the Ancient Aliens conspiracy theory? You dumb little brat.

2 points

He said he had the right to shoot me, when I prsent no threat to his person, or property.

And busted for yet another lie:-

It Is My Right As An American To Shoot Yeshua In Self-Defence

Her angry, abusive tirades are extremely threatening and unpredictable. It is my right as an American not to feel threatened

http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ It IsMyRightAsAnAmericanToShootYeshuaInSelfDefence

2 points

That's just a generic accusation you use as a fallback whenever someone criticises the complete idiocy of the things you write. You deflect to it whenever you realise you can't defend what you've written.

Yeshua is a Brontoraptor alt. Same appeals to Jewish racial superiority while hiding behind the lie of being Christian. Brontoraptor is a far right Jewish fascist who pretends to be Christian to try to create a faux aura of neutrality while he's busy resurrecting racial theories buried with the Nazis.

2 points

I find it funny that he upvoted this without realizing that you essentially just said he doesn't get pussy.

Do you know what I find funny?

I find it funny that you're a sad, lonely troll who spends the entire day trying to get my attention. You reek of desperation and you've spent the entire afternoon spamming me yet again with private messages that read like they have been written by a three year old with learning difficulties. See:-

https://ibb.co/L6PThH5

You need psychiatric intervention mate.

0 points

They'll force you to have a crack baby

Are you a crack baby, Outlaw? Speak up now.

1 point

Are you aware of the youtube red series?

Yeah, I watched both seasons a few months back.

1 point

People have the right to the wages they earn

But that's socialism. Capitalism is the other one, where they earn five percent of what they produce and the company they work for steals the rest. You seem to have them mixed up. Socialism is the one where they get the total value of what their work produces and nobody above them steals a cent.

1 point

I never said that

You didn't have to. Your implication was very clear. Why do you want to execute innocent people for something their kids did?

Yes. Poor people, don't have the right to have children

OK. Then rich people don't have the right to have money. Fair deal?

1 point

I don't want a gun, but if someone else does want to protect themselves, they have that right.

Shut up hypocrite. You argued the complete opposite earlier. When I made clear I was exercising my right to protect myself from you with a gun you claimed I was threatening you. When the gun owner is you, you claim to be the victim, and when it is someone else you claim you are still the victim!!

0 points

Conservatives tend to think parents are responsible for their own children.

So you want to execute the parents too? Wow.

If you can't afford children, purchase birth control

So poor people don't have the right to have children because they are poor? LOL! You're madder than a March hare.

And birth control isn't 100 percent effect anyway, dopey. You'll still produce 1 to 5 kids for every hundred times people have sex.

I had a shit life, and have never committed a felony crime.

I was born black and never turned into a great basketball player. Therefore Michael Jordan can't be real. Gimme a break. Your arguments are farcical.

1 point

I am not a gun owner

You have a long history of not telling the truth, so I'm afraid I am going to presume you are armed and deal with you accordingly.

1 point

Ever wonder why Conservatives insist upon putting a child through a life of hell so that it finally snaps and kills someone, whereas Liberals simply use common sense and abort these babies before they have a chance to be harmed and/or do harm?

Liberals try to prevent these mass murderers from ever being born, but you insist they are born. Hence, you are the ones responsible for the murders they commit, and you are the ones who should be executed for them.

How do you feel about that?

0 points

If you take a life, you lose your life.

While at the same time you advocate blowing holes in anybody who enters your house without permission. Your entire belief system is one big fat contradiction of itself.

JamesDD(11) Clarified
1 point

Democrats deny real science

What a laughable no true Scotsman fallacy. You're such an idiot.

JamesDD(11) Clarified
1 point

Correction, I didn’t know Yahweh was a thing.

So you made a claim about a subject you are -- by your own admission -- completely ignorant about. Yahweh is the Christian God. Allah is the Islamic God. Allah is not just another word for the Christian God. Understand?

1 point

I did not need an essay on allah.

But obviously you did. You thought Allah and Yahweh were the same deity.

JamesDD(11) Clarified
2 points

Allah also just means god anyway

The Muslim God is not the same as the Christian God, obviously. Please see:-

Let’s first look at the origin and meaning for the term “Allah.” Allah probably comes from the Aramaic compound term “al-ilah,” which means “the god.” It is a generic term for the highest god of the people, and in Arabia it was in use for centuries before Muhammad came on the scene. Apparently it was one of the 360 gods worshipped in the ka’aba in Mecca, and was the chief god for the Quraysh tribe, which was the tribe Muhammad belonged to.

When we look at Yahweh, however, who is the God of the Bible, we see a different kind of deity. First of all, the name “Yahweh” comes from the time that God appeared to Moses in the burning bush. At that time God told Moses to call him “I am that I am,” or in Hebrew, “Yahweh.” It is significant that Jesus referred to himself as the “I am” in John 8:58. The Jews realized that Jesus was referring to himself as God and took up stones to stone him for what they believed was blasphemy. This link between Jesus in the New Testament and the burning bush in the Old Testament demonstrates the unity of the one God manifested to both the Jews and the Christians. This cannot be said of the Muslim God because Muslims reject the deity of Jesus and therefore reject much of what the New Testament says about Jesus. We also find that the Bible portrays Yahweh in contrast to Allah. For example, Allah is considered to be too holy to have personal relationships with man, but Yahweh is often described as a loving God interested in our personal struggles. Yahweh is also depicted as unchanging and One who assures the salvation of the faithful. Finally, because there is unity in the Trinity with the one God also being three persons, God can be described as the Father of Jesus.

https://www.ciu.edu/content/allah-islam-same-yahweh-christianity

1 point

The Indian knows the environment is racist.

Not the environment. Environmental policy. Environmental racism is a political concept which dates back to the early 1970s. The phrase was coined after it became clear the government was dumping hazardous waste in low income black areas.

Open a book you sad populist twit.

1 point

The environment now knows how to discriminate against those that are low income and minorities.

Your straw man arguments are just pointlessly stupid. You're literally mocking your own claims. Who said the environment knows how to discriminate? That isn't what "environmental racism" means. You've decided to pretend it means what you want it to mean, just so you can then use that false definition to attack "Democrats".

You're an idiot mate. You sit here all night posting idiotic partisan rubbish and never, not once in a million years, do you ever have a valid point. You're not even amusing. You're just a spammer.

2 points

I would just like somebody to explain why anybody thought this guy would make a good president. When he was running his campaign and talking about "draining the swamp" I just scratched my head in disbelief that anybody would be stupid enough to fall for it. He lives in the goddamned swamp. Why would he want to drain it?

1 point

Beam me up, Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here!

He opened twelve of these yesterday, plus he sent another dozen or so private messages with similar content. He's an attention-seeking infant with some serious mental health issues.

1 point

After all, they didn't help us at Normandy either

Us? You were nowhere near Normandy you pathetic revisionist.

You are a disgusting human being. A fake Jew and a fake soldier. Other people die and you try to take the credit for it.


1 of 6 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]