CreateDebate


Julius's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Julius's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Actually, the ancient Greeks all believed that in order to be healthy and happy, you had to both be intelligent, and physically healthy.

Ggnore?

Julius(201) Clarified
1 point

"Physically healthy, maybe so. But physical goodness does not necessitate moral goodness."

The Ancient Greeks would disagree.

Julius(201) Clarified
2 points

As I saw on a university desk, "If abortion is murder, masturbation is genicide", it's the theory that the sperm(assuming you're male) is going to waste, and some would argue that sperm is a living thing.

1 point

Shun! Shun! The stupid..it burns!

He was a fascist, and was right winged by it! He had free market for people! That is right winged! As such, adding in the authoritarian side ends up making him fascist!

1 point

Every hear of Sovernty? The right for a country to rule their people? If they wan't to lower liberty for safty, it's their own choice.

Julius(201) Clarified
5 points

Damnit, you beat me to my own argument! .

1 point

What's a terroist? The Syrian goverment is classifing the rebels as terrosits, and should they be dead?

Though, being dead would be better than G. bay....

Julius(201) Clarified
1 point

In the table, isn't the first one the same as the last one? Or am I missing something?

2 points

ITALY! My Godric, all of the pasta..and the Veil..and the Meat...just..My Godric...

Julius(201) Clarified
1 point

Test I wonder if that'll work...... .

1 point

This is so cool! .

Julius(201) Clarified
1 point

And with that, we end on a highnote.

.

Julius(201) Clarified
1 point

Oh, hi, I never realized how old this was... .

2 points

"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors"

In other word,s according to your article, we're both right.

1 point

1: http://www.queerbychoice.com/ a website for people 'queer' by choice.

2: http://web.archive.org/web/20040105072257/http://staffweb.lib.uiowa.edu/ktonella/oob/features/Biology.htm another article, about how it's choice. (Clearly, if the reason these women felt they were lesbians was because they felt emotionally closer to women, then being a lesbian cannot be biological. First of all, since most women feel that way, we would have to say that most women are born lesbians and that can't be true (except perhaps on a theoretical level). Secondly, whether you feel emotionally close to someone does not seem likely to be biological: it seems much more plausible that it has something to do with the emotional and psychological characteristics of the person.) Straight from the website.

3) "Much of the evidence for inheritance of sexual orientation comes from studies of concordance rates in identical (monozygotic) twins raised apart. "Concordance" means sameness with regard to a particular characteristic. Thus, if all the homosexual identical twins in a study have a twin who is also homosexual, the concordance rate is 100%." (http://web.archive.org/web/20031231202804/http://www.geneletter.com/archives/homosexuality.html)

Please, tell me more how about you have give evidence and logic, proving you case.

1 point

Kay. Honestly, I'd have better luck arguing with the wall next to me. As such, Julius, Out.

1 point

I am choosing, though. I'm choosing not to be attracted to you, both for my sanity and for this debate. Use logic, Grandma.

1 point

Ha, it's hard to be attracted to someone you don't like. There's a diffrence between gender and personality.

1 point

It's ironic, because it comes down to either A: you trying to be smart and failing, or B: completely missing the point.

I have yet to see you back up any argument, even after being prompted from myself and having this confirmed by Soviet Spy,with any evidence. Not a page. Not a document. You just state your thoughts, without trying to prove it. Then, comes along people such as myself, who does this. If this was your own debate you'd have banned me. That shows a complete lack of both a: a complete lack of maturity, and b: a lack of the will to actually debate. This site, here, is a debate site, and as such, should be used as a debate site, not somewhere for people, such as yourself to state things without backing them up.

To end this, I'm going to do what the internet has taught me to do, "Someday, somewhere, I hope someone knocks some sense into your skull, you're once dense mother fucker."

1 point

You're completely uneducated and wrong, and as such, should stop spewing utter nonsense.

1 point

( (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻) )

It's a proven fact that people DO choose who they are attracted to.

1 point

....There's so much stupid in this one argument. A: I'm leftwing, far left wing. I don't deal with right-wing shit. B: I do think, otherwise I'd be a braindead slug, and last time I checked I'm sitting here, talking, no? C: Explain as to why people change their sexuality.

1 point

Done. Anime has it's advantages. .

1 point

I actually laughed, you're claiming me as folding. We'll go hypothetical, then. I'm gay, what's this, 'point' of yours?


1 of 9 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]