- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors"
In other word,s according to your article, we're both right.
1: http://www.queerbychoice.com/ a website for people 'queer' by choice.
3) "Much of the evidence for inheritance of sexual orientation comes from studies of concordance rates in identical (monozygotic) twins raised apart. "Concordance" means sameness with regard to a particular characteristic. Thus, if all the homosexual identical twins in a study have a twin who is also homosexual, the concordance rate is 100%." (http://web.archive.org/web/
Please, tell me more how about you have give evidence and logic, proving you case.
It's ironic, because it comes down to either A: you trying to be smart and failing, or B: completely missing the point.
I have yet to see you back up any argument, even after being prompted from myself and having this confirmed by Soviet Spy,with any evidence. Not a page. Not a document. You just state your thoughts, without trying to prove it. Then, comes along people such as myself, who does this. If this was your own debate you'd have banned me. That shows a complete lack of both a: a complete lack of maturity, and b: a lack of the will to actually debate. This site, here, is a debate site, and as such, should be used as a debate site, not somewhere for people, such as yourself to state things without backing them up.
To end this, I'm going to do what the internet has taught me to do, "Someday, somewhere, I hope someone knocks some sense into your skull, you're once dense mother fucker."
....There's so much stupid in this one argument. A: I'm leftwing, far left wing. I don't deal with right-wing shit. B: I do think, otherwise I'd be a braindead slug, and last time I checked I'm sitting here, talking, no? C: Explain as to why people change their sexuality.