- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Anybody who thinks he advocates communism and fascism is obviously stupid and retarded (so far everybody on the 'yes' side).
Also by donating millions of dollars to revamp his home town is definately proof of his capitalist agenda.
Instead of arguing (stupid and blindly) against the guy himself, maybe you should argue against the points he raises.
I've got no idea what you've just said seeing as you like talking like a posh twat but I definately know you have no idea what I was talking about. If you're so confused all you've got to do is ask and uncle Kinda might be kind enough to explain. I probably won't though, seeing as you're a cunt.
China is ahead of India because of it's authoritarian ways. It bulldozes into better socio-economic levels, abusing rights on the way.
So you have to weigh economic-social development with freedom and rights. Chinese have better economy, India has better rights. You tell me which one you'd prefer.
Men are better drivers than women. It's a fact. Women are more careful drivers than men. That's a fact. There's a difference between the two of them.
I think you'll find all black people will agree to the stereotype. Except for those self hating type.
I'll make this pure and simple. I can't even remember the point of this debate now tbh but it is simply impossible to address everyone individually. That's why you MUST categorise and stereotype. It doesn't mean every black person I see definately likes fried chicken. He/she probably does though. Doesn't mean every black person I see will try and break into my car. But I'd rather not take the chance.
Actually most stereotypes tend to be pretty accurate. Black people DO like fried chicken. Maybe a small minority do not, doesn't mean we should stop saying they like fried chicken because a couple don't. In the same way stereotypes of men and women tend to be correct. Men are better drivers than women. Men are better at making decisions. Mens characteristics are suited better towards leading than women. It doesn't mean all men are better at any of these things, but it does mean that most are. I am basing this on stereotypes, but that's because stereotypes tend to be pretty accurate.
Doesn't work. I can see what you're trying to say but it doesn't work.
Don't worry I don't think it's just people of different sexes that shouldn't be treated equally. I don't think anybody should be treated the same. No 2 people are alike and so the ways of treating each person should differ aswel. You can categorise people into groups and subgroups and each of them have ways of being dealth with/treated. If you look as men and women as human (1 group), then yes they should be treated equally - but when you say that men and women should be treated equally - they shouldn't, because they're different.
Actually America isn't the only country everyone tries to migrate to. It also doesn't mean that USA is the greatest country. It might be great for 100 years but it's already sliding downhill. Now thousands of people are beginning to migrate to China and India and Brazil. You don't look at one small time frame and 1 small reason to decide whether or not a country is great. You look at the whole of its history. USA has historically been weak, bloodthirsty, lack of liberty and freedom etc. Maybe for a period of 50 years it was on its way to becoming a country somebody could look back in the future and call great but it never made it.
Look tbh I couldn't give a monkeys. I know the difference between men and women. I just hate these faggots and feminists who go around saying that men and women are equal. We're not. We shouldn't be treated equally either. I just say all that shit to wind these feminists dickheads up. It always works.
You are fearful because you buy the media's bull.
I bought the media's bull? Your WHOLE POST just proved you did.
Yes America isn't the shitest country. Yes you can walk around in America freely and invest money and not worry about the government killing you with the click of it's fingers (many exceptions to this case actually) but you can do that in hundreds of other countries. Just cause America isn't the worst.. doesn't mean it's the best. Get your thumb out of your ass. America isn't the only country where people can practice their own religion, politics etc.
yes in many cities there are people who have problems even if their daughter's in law wish to study.
A problem I admit. But would you rather have a country where education for women is a small issue or women selling their bodies is no issue.
yeah and there are many other jobs where women can work till noon and return home before their children do. my mother does that. and if there is a situation of lack of parenting then why do the men in the family work? shouldn't they also sit with their kids and make sure they get enough guidance from their parents.
Try thinking a bit yourself. It may be hard. But try. Also try to actually listen to what I say. I have not got a problem with women working. Do you understand that? Yes or no? I DO have a problem with women trading work for parenting. Do you understand that? If a mother can have a full time job and look after her kids well - I would never have a problem. But it does not typically happen. So let me tell you one last time - If a women is able to work and raise her children correctly I have no fucking problem. Unless ofcourse there's a question of poverty where the woman must work - but that's a different case altogether.
Why do men work? As role models? To show their sons how to take responsibility as a man? Is it that fucking hard to think of this yourself?
then how come it's a beautiful country?
yeah n I live in India and am usually in different cities.
You're just stupid then. Taken in by newspaper reporting worst case scenarios. You don't actually have a clue about what's going on around you.
Law of economics:
Private costs > Government costs.
This has been proven time and time again. In theory it should be cheaper and more efficient, but that's only when all companies are of equal size. In REALITY (important word) the road industry would be run by oligarchs. This means that people will be paying MORE while corporates will be trying to give LESS. Why? The incentive to make money (the basis of capitalism) The less you give and the more you get = higher profit margins.
I know you're a dickhead aka libertarian so you feel the less governmental incentive = better outcomes in every single way. Then you use America as an example of the success of capitalism even though if you knew it's history it was always due to governmental intervention. I've tried to dumb down this argument so you may actually understand it. I hope for your sake (being the devils advocate) that you understand this.
Do you even know what the dowry is or do you listen to what the white man's definition?
why shouldn't she have a right to work?
Nobody said there's anything wrong with women working. Did I say that? Has anybody said that? The problem with westerners is the lack of parenting. This is done because of the lack of time parents spend with the kids and also the extremely high divorce rates. Women slowly moving into the workplace may be a good thing, but it shouldn't mean spending less time with the children.
stop using dirty language. and while talking of a countries good points one rarely come up with the culture topic.
Faggot. Who doesn't come up with culture? Culture is the lifestyles of the people within a country. Culture is one of the most important things.
ask a Hindu how scared he is while walking through a Muslim area and a Muslim while he's walking through a Hindu area. both are scared whether the other will come out and stab him in the back or not.
No they're not. I've been India several times. They live next to each other side by side. Rarely any issues. There are occasional outbursts of violence but you ask me which country that doesn't happen in.
Everyone who says capitalism is ALWAYS American. Brainwashing obviously has nothing to do with this. They have no idea of what socialism or communism is.
The best economic system is a system where everyone has a job, enough money, easy and equal access to health, education, good security etc. etc. Capitalism will NEVER provide this. Socialism is the closest and (so far) the most effective and succesful out of all the other systems.
yeah and like dowry system is not backward?
What's wrong with the dowry system?
the thought that women should be housewives is not backward?
Well standing in front of men with money with her legs open is obviously forwards....
but does culture make a coutnry good?
then wtf makes a country good?
we have almost all the violence a country could ask for!!!
Ask Indians how scared they're to walk in the streets, especially at night and then ask British or Americans.
tiger cub died in banglore park
......you want a blue peter badge?
Do you really believe all that bullshit?
It's one of the most fearful nations in the world. Scared of the government, terrorists, immigrants, canadians, blacks, mexicans, republicans, democrats, liberals, neighbours even family.
The government (bankrolled by corporations) has you believe all this shit so that they can confuse you into the direction they want you to go. You're sheep. You just don't know it.
The experience isn't controlled by myself but the situation, and instructors by what they think martial arts is.
You've nearly answered your own questions. Also the fact that you were younger, so your understanding would be way way limited. But seeing as you're so smart you should've known all of this...
Self defense is useless especially if the assailant has a gun. Martial Arts only teaches hypothetical scenarios as opposed to real life situations.
Martial Arts is a gimmick for created for Hollywood movies.
Lol are you fucking serious? How many physical confrontations result in gun violence? The way you put it it's 100%. But for the man who lives in reality... 99% of physical confrontations are close range and without the use of guns.
Martial Arts only teaches hypothetical scenarios as opposed to real life situations.
Buying a gun from Wal-Mart obviously teaches a lot more. What's hypothetical about a fight? I'm guessing you've never been in one.
Martial Arts is a gimmick for created for Hollywood movies.
Right. It had no use for the previous 100000000 years before hollywood.
This is the thing about Americans. Apart from being overtly retarded and having no idea about maps and what goes where you're shit at spelling.
It's spelt C-A-N-A-D-A. You know? The country where they have better healthcare, schools, environment, safer neighbourhoods etc. etc.
To answer the question 'is it better to be a follower or a leader' only sheeps can be sheeps and shephards be shephards. A leader might be more valuable, but that's not the question.
Being a leader means you have actually have to be able to lead, not just sit with a crown on your head cough the queen cough. It also means making incredibly tough decisions and having to take responsibility for those actions. Having the respect and/or fear of your followers, and those of other leaders. Being a leader might make you bigger, but it also means bigger problems, responsibilities and downfalls, aswell as the glory etc. It's not as simple as you all think and it's not like TV where you always win.