Law of economics:
Private costs > Government costs.
This has been proven time and time again. In theory it should be cheaper and more efficient, but that's only when all companies are of equal size. In REALITY (important word) the road industry would be run by oligarchs. This means that people will be paying MORE while corporates will be trying to give LESS. Why? The incentive to make money (the basis of capitalism) The less you give and the more you get = higher profit margins.
I know you're a dickhead aka libertarian so you feel the less governmental incentive = better outcomes in every single way. Then you use America as an example of the success of capitalism even though if you knew it's history it was always due to governmental intervention. I've tried to dumb down this argument so you may actually understand it. I hope for your sake (being the devils advocate) that you understand this.
Do you even know what the dowry is or do you listen to what the white man's definition?
why shouldn't she have a right to work?
Nobody said there's anything wrong with women working. Did I say that? Has anybody said that? The problem with westerners is the lack of parenting. This is done because of the lack of time parents spend with the kids and also the extremely high divorce rates. Women slowly moving into the workplace may be a good thing, but it shouldn't mean spending less time with the children.
stop using dirty language. and while talking of a countries good points one rarely come up with the culture topic.
Faggot. Who doesn't come up with culture? Culture is the lifestyles of the people within a country. Culture is one of the most important things.
ask a Hindu how scared he is while walking through a Muslim area and a Muslim while he's walking through a Hindu area. both are scared whether the other will come out and stab him in the back or not.
No they're not. I've been India several times. They live next to each other side by side. Rarely any issues. There are occasional outbursts of violence but you ask me which country that doesn't happen in.
Everyone who says capitalism is ALWAYS American. Brainwashing obviously has nothing to do with this. They have no idea of what socialism or communism is.
The best economic system is a system where everyone has a job, enough money, easy and equal access to health, education, good security etc. etc. Capitalism will NEVER provide this. Socialism is the closest and (so far) the most effective and succesful out of all the other systems.
yeah and like dowry system is not backward?
What's wrong with the dowry system?
the thought that women should be housewives is not backward?
Well standing in front of men with money with her legs open is obviously forwards....
but does culture make a coutnry good?
then wtf makes a country good?
we have almost all the violence a country could ask for!!!
Ask Indians how scared they're to walk in the streets, especially at night and then ask British or Americans.
tiger cub died in banglore park
......you want a blue peter badge?
Do you really believe all that bullshit?
It's one of the most fearful nations in the world. Scared of the government, terrorists, immigrants, canadians, blacks, mexicans, republicans, democrats, liberals, neighbours even family.
The government (bankrolled by corporations) has you believe all this shit so that they can confuse you into the direction they want you to go. You're sheep. You just don't know it.
The experience isn't controlled by myself but the situation, and instructors by what they think martial arts is.
You've nearly answered your own questions. Also the fact that you were younger, so your understanding would be way way limited. But seeing as you're so smart you should've known all of this...
Self defense is useless especially if the assailant has a gun. Martial Arts only teaches hypothetical scenarios as opposed to real life situations.
Martial Arts is a gimmick for created for Hollywood movies.
Lol are you fucking serious? How many physical confrontations result in gun violence? The way you put it it's 100%. But for the man who lives in reality... 99% of physical confrontations are close range and without the use of guns.
Martial Arts only teaches hypothetical scenarios as opposed to real life situations.
Buying a gun from Wal-Mart obviously teaches a lot more. What's hypothetical about a fight? I'm guessing you've never been in one.
Martial Arts is a gimmick for created for Hollywood movies.
Right. It had no use for the previous 100000000 years before hollywood.
Western understanding of martial arts is so far removed from it's reality it's fucking shameful. Then again what would you expect from them?
If any of your understanding of martial arts comes from movies then you're truly fucked in this debate.
This is the thing about Americans. Apart from being overtly retarded and having no idea about maps and what goes where you're shit at spelling.
It's spelt C-A-N-A-D-A. You know? The country where they have better healthcare, schools, environment, safer neighbourhoods etc. etc.
To answer the question 'is it better to be a follower or a leader' only sheeps can be sheeps and shephards be shephards. A leader might be more valuable, but that's not the question.
Being a leader means you have actually have to be able to lead, not just sit with a crown on your head cough the queen cough. It also means making incredibly tough decisions and having to take responsibility for those actions. Having the respect and/or fear of your followers, and those of other leaders. Being a leader might make you bigger, but it also means bigger problems, responsibilities and downfalls, aswell as the glory etc. It's not as simple as you all think and it's not like TV where you always win.
The closest highest amountn of aggression I've felt to the government was during the G20 riots when I just felt the government shouldn't have bailed out the banks.
Things that would affect my personal life i.e. religion, race, culture. Not being allowed to practice my religion. Things like that.
Where are your balls for christs sake?
Explain to me by what you define racism as.
Is it a black guy saying white people ain't got rythm? Because they're right
Is it a white guy saying black people have only themselves to blame for their problems? Because they're right.
There's a million reasons to why I would revolt. Sitting here giving a list to them all is just stupid.
I don't see many revolts happening though. The government is smarter than it used to be. It's learnt to slowly brainswash and slowly introduce changes rather than making big impulsive changes all at once.
His motto would be the same.
Its his actions that would be completely different. (Saying one thing and doing another is the American way) He would charge the American people for his services and would probably take it through force. Because it's his right to do so. Yay. :D.
I think I like the fact that when I make a racial white joke I'm called an individualist or a free thinker or a spectacular comedian and if a white person makes a racial joke he/she is called racist.
I like the fact that I can openly oppose christianity, white people's history, culture, beliefs whereas they cannot.
I like it. We shouldn't get rid of that.
Yeah this is kind of gay...
I should be able to smoke in my car. I barely ever smoke and even rarer in my car but if I do I prefer to air it out. If I was a smoker then I should be able to smoke in my car (in my situation) I've never had anyone under 16 in my car.
It's different for parents with kids. Banning smoking in all vehicles is absurd... and if people want to kill their children slowly, it's their choice. In this situation advice is the better option.
How is that a lie then?
The prophet married Aisha with acceptance of her father Abu-Bakr
So that makes it ok?
And societies at that time - including Jewish and Christian ones - used to marry women as soon as they reached puberty.
Umm no they didn't. In those times most girls hit puberty after the age of 12.
But his proposal was rejected because he was a non-Muslim.
By definition a tolerant religion.
That is completely opposite to the suffering a pedophilia victim would go through.
Actually it's not.
‘When a girl is nine years old, she is a woman (meaning, she has attained puberty).’
So we should listen to what she says.
Uncultured fool? Lmao.
1% of my culture is worth more than 100% of your culture.
But being smarter and not as hypocritical as you and just better in nearly every single way I'm not sitting here calling you an uncultured fool for not listening to Lata Mangeshkar now am I?
You're right. Homosexuals do listen to Justin Beiber and wish they could impale him with their little sticks. Same to other modern musicians.
However in this insistance - or a better word is context - it's for lamos unsociables shitheads etc. etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm
I knew there would be one idiot who wouldn't understand. I'm glad it's you who took the bait.
Let me explain to you retardface that in the described communist society people wouldn't have the choice so it and collect welfare. Even if they did have the choice... their mentality would be completely different - they wouldn't be sitting there trying to skive off.
Being good looking is a plus in your characteristics. Like being confident. Or funny. Or tough. Or decisive etc.
On a side note: You're ugly Rupert. Just thought I'd let you know before anybody else has to say anything. (Your mother calling you handsome doesn't count)
The problem with the new economic growth is that it doesn't stop as economic growth - it infects the social life and is slowly westernising India. I'll blame the corporations but I always do that. India needs to rid itself of the cancers that still effect it - especially those brought in by the British. Poverty isn't the number one priority because I know that they'd rather live poor and right than rich and white.
Facebook is wwaaaayyy better.
Even though I barely go on either.. I only go on createdebate to waste time, whereas I go on facebook to actually do things i.e. talk to people, send messeges and add really attractive girls who I don't even know.
http://www.essaysbyekowa.com/
According to this source basically everybody in the world is black.
lol.
I love it how people act like schools and companies don't.
Oxford and Cambridge are perfect examples of how education bodies only allow a certain number of ethnics. Not too little so that they look racist, but not too many so that it taints them. Pssshhh...
But I'm on the white's side on this one. I hate it when some retarded black guy is hired because he has to be, not because he's the best candidate. Same goes to hiring an indian (fob) guy because they're the best workers. They're also a bit dry.
Good. So you can't prove anything. You're just making stupid statements and hoping that all your other idiot friends join in. Even with all those youtube videos, internet articles and libraries you can't prove shit.
So we can put this aside once and for all. I hope one day you raise yourself above your ignorance and truly learn about arranged marriages. If you don't - it doesn't matter to me, but for someone like you who likes to think he bases his thoughts and ideals on facts and logic and coldly heartlessly without emotion etc. it would do you some good to learn about this.
This next question might hurt a bit (due to your tiny brain and all) but do you actually believe that any America (or person in the world really) makes a choice without outside influence? I'll give you time to think about your answer, because knowing you it's probably wrong and retarded. Take your time and then come back to me because it's the only way you will be able to debate on my level.
Let's take a non-biased athiest approach to this
If religion was idiotic it wouldn't have been able to control the masses for the thousands of years it has.
It wouldn't have been able to cause war for differences in beliefs when it was actually for resources and land
It wouldn't have been able to kill millions of people for their ethnicities
It wouldn't have been able to convince millions on something they can't touch, see or hear, but can only feel - in their heads.
Thus concluding (as a non-biased athiest) that religion is actually extremely fucking smart.
There should always be some flexibility - depending on the circumstances.
Using the gypsies as an example. They live within their own communities barely open to change. They grow up following the footsteps of their parents. Without sounding racist using Irish 'travellers' as an example - most tend to work in the trades. Knowing that their children are most likely to grow up doing the same thing, is there a point in teaching them all this shit during their first 16 years they're 99% not likely to use or even appreciate? Actually I'd prefer they didn't spend anymore tax money on these cunts that never pay taxes themselves.
However in some communities where revenge killings occur, the law should apply to them regardless of their personal beliefs.
Lol sand in your vagina darling?
Yet there is story upon story all over the Internet, news, libraries, youtube, etc. of a woman or a man being forced into marriage (arranged) then killed or maimed for not complying.
Ahh you see there. You've just proved my point. You've taken the most drastic and least reputative examples on the internet (probably posted by racists or liberals) and used them as your definition of the whole. It's the same as calling all muslims terrorists. The exact same.
You've also taken the worst examples from different parts of the worlds and cultures. I'm not sitting here saying americans like to eat frog's legs, because it's the french who like it. But you're sitting there mixing arabic and muslim tradition with indian and hindu traditions.
You also don't understand the fundamental difference between arranged and forced marriages. Infact your idea of an arranged marriage is a forced marriage. So what happened to all the billions of arranged marriages that aren't forced?
So for you to gain your first win against me you have to do this:
1) Prove that arranged marriages are forced marriages
2) Leading to proving that nobody has a choice in an arranged marriage
3) Prove that all cultures (that partake in arranged marriages) are the exact same when it comes to arranged marriages
4) Prove that all examples you give me are the majority not the minority.
5) And finally prove that a spoilt white retarded suburbian has more knowledge about arranged marriages than an urban indian. - That's just for my amusement you don't actually have to.
You can sit there with your thumb up your ass as long as you want but let's look at the facts. There are more people like you on this website than there are like me. Even with huge numbers of religious folk, they're not likely to agree with me due to them being christian. So the reason why you get more upvotes on certain debates (if you do, I don't know) - because more people agree with you beforehand and would upvote you regardless of how stupidly you write anything. I'm probably the smallest minority on this website (after the Quasi guy) and so should naturally have the least upvotes. But I don't. I also take the piss out of everyone. So using logic - which I see you don't have much of - how much of the votes on this website (on anyone) is based on their arguments and how much has to do with personal favouritism or opinions. You don't have to answer that. Not because you're a retarded faggot. Not because you still don't have a clue on what you're talking about. But because you probably already know this - you just don't know you know it.
360 in the sense of degrees in a circle, wherein 360 is also "0".
Ohhh shit. The genius again. Was this a question in your little test?
As I have an IQ of 167, and a job recycling tyres at my father's plant, the only evidence I have seems to refute your notions.
Hmmm so daddy's little boy sitting in the office obviously equates to manual labour.
Seems to me that 'IQ' is trying to measure something that's intangible. It's putting numbers on a small part of a brain which somehow equates the whole of the brain.
Aren't you one of those faggots who cry about how important creativity and individualism and self-esteem is yet now you're limiting the importance of it?
Idiocy.
Racism.
Bigotry.
Being an bastard.
this obviously doesn't apply to you.
Does intelligence somehow make somebody weak?
Answer the question. How many of these people can do manual labour.
It is not designed to do so.
Which obviously shows that it doesn't measure intelligence but only proportions of it.
Unfortunately, you have a low IQ and none of these qualities.
Great. Your internet IQ said you have and IQ of 152 (or w.e.) and that's the best you can come up with. I guess my IQ must be 360...
Owww.... poor old david.
An arranged marriage is one where two people decide to marry each other after a couple of meetings which their relatives attend. Sometimes it's only one meeting.
It's one where family give advice on whether or not you should marry.
The parents have a say. The brothers and sisters have a say. Aunts and uncles have a say. But the couiple have the choice.
In some cultures people choose to ignore the difference between arranged and forced marriages. They also choose to ignore the differences between certain cultures and how these arranged marriages take place. It's called ignorance in much of the West.
Once again with your limited understanding of the earth, you are only talking about some traditional Middle Eastern marriages because you live in a mental bubble. You are talking about the process where the couple doesn't have a limited choice because of the family.
Still you're stupid. People who are in love for one minute and the next shouldn't be married. The choice should always be wise, not foolish.
I'm just happy you now see the light. Again.
