Citation needed
No citation is needed to support basic common sense. A philanthropist would by very definition give his money away to those less fortunate, hence preventing him from ever becoming rich.
@FactMachine
Once again, you demonstrate your complete ignorance of the facts.
In a recent World Health Organisation report of the dental status of children known as the DFMT index, for example, British youths had fewer decayed, missing or filled teeth than those in France, Spain and Sweden; Britain’s rates were comparable with Germany, the Netherlands and Finland.
The United States, on the other hand, did quite a bit worse. At the age of 12, children in the United Kingdom have on average better teeth than their American counterparts. This is due to a decrease in the number of children with decayed teeth in Britain in the last 10 years. In England there are, on average, 0.6 decayed missing or filled teeth per 12-year-old. In the United States, the figure is double this
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/
In actual fact, as recent studies demonstrate, the British, along with the Germans, actually have the healthiest teeth on the entire planet. See:-
https://top5ofanything.
Nixon had the phone of every important Democratic politician tapped and he hired ex-CIA thugs to break into Democratic National Headquarters and steal information, yet you actually have the audacity to criticise Obama for surveillance of the opposition party?
You are laughable. Everything you say is positively cringeworthy. You quite literally are the most stupid person I have ever encountered in my entire adult life.
We couldn't care less if people who's teeth glow in the dark laugh at us.
Bronto, you are quite literally so stupid that it is sometimes impossible to believe you aren't doing it deliberately. You stole that line from a British poster who used it to accentuate the fact that Americans all have fake teeth, very much like they all have fake boobs.
If you are going to steal and plagiarise other peoples jokes, then at least do them the courtesy of ensuring the joke makes sense in the context you apply it in, you stupid fucking goosestepper.
They will, and we Brits will be laughing our arses off at you!
Well said. I've just watched his state of the union address and he has perfected the art of appealing to idiots.
Idiots are America's most plentiful resource, so it's a clever move.
It seems odd a new member would take such high an issue with reference to another
My "issue" is not with your unprovoked attacks against other members. My issue is with your utter contempt for scientific research, common sense and truth.
Now fuck off back to whichever hole you crawled out of.
Not enough of Mohammed's followers had a problem with their leader having seX with a little child
Nineteen is not a little child. Aisha was at least nineteen when Mohammed had sex with her. If you had enough intelligence to actually research the things you hear on Breitbart and in KKK meetings, you would know this already. Read it, idiot:-
My previous post was intended to take a "jab" at Nomenclature by pretending as though his "arguments" on the matter make any sense whatsoever
Oh please shut up you obnoxiously stupid, science denying retard. The science says that you are a fucking idiot:-
Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say
https://www.deseretnews.com/article/
Your biased opinion is worth absolute zero because you are a delusionally stupid retard with a narcissistic personality disorder.
@FactMachine.
Why do you write replies to your own insane ramblings?
You must be very very lonely.
It would be absolutely no different in the short term. The problem is more long term. Electing a pathological liar of Trump's magnitude sets a historical precedent and shifts society one step closer to an idiocracy.
I know you just say stupid shit to troll. The twin paradox illustrates time dilation
I am not saying "stupid shit to troll". I am trying to explain that you have no idea what you are talking about.
The apparent paradox arising from relativity theory that if one of a pair of twins makes a long journey at near the speed of light and then returns, he or she will have aged less than the twin who remains behind.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twinparadox
Time dilation has certainly been illustrated in theory, but not by the twin paradox. For God's sake shut up.
In theory, it'd take a century to even get close to rounding up all of the existing guns.
You literally just made this up. In order to know how long it would take to round up the existing guns, you would need to know both the number of guns and the rate at which those guns are handed over and/or procured once they are illegalised. Firstly, guns have not been illegalised in the United States. Secondly, if they had been, you would then have no idea how many guns still existed in society because people would no longer declare them.
Why don't you use another of your thirty accounts to see if you have better success against the law of reason, you offensively stupid bastard?
Criminals don't obey gun laws. Criminals still have guns.
This is a massive and purposeful distortion in which you attempt to vastly inflate the number of people who feel confident about owning a gun in a country with a five year minimum sentence for gun possession, by labelling that group "criminals". As societies like the UK prove, the VAST MAJORITY of criminals DO OBEY GUN LAWS.
It doesn't appear to slow down, it actually slows down.
Jesus Christ, you literally have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Firstly, my problem was with your claim that time appears to slow down for the traveller because that claim is not true. Secondly, time does not "actually slow down" because there is no universal rate at which time moves. That's the entire point. Two different observers can experience two different rates of time, and neither is more correct than the other.
I wish you would stop trying to deflect the issue every time someone points out that you have no idea what you are talking about. It makes conversation with you difficult and frustrating.
The twin paradox has been verified.
Amarel, the twin paradox has not been verified because astronauts are not able to travel anywhere near to the speed of light. Please shut up. Not only are you saying stupid things, but you are trying to use these stupid things to deflect away from the stupid things you have said previously. This is a recurring pattern of behaviour with you.
Interestingly there are no school-shooters in the UK, that's because there are no gun shops on every corner
How dare you try to force Americans to acknowledge basic common sense? You must be stopped at all costs.
Clearly, you don't understand that Americans need guns to protect them from Americans with guns.
Time is relative for everyone smart guy.
No it isn't. Time is relative to the observer, not the traveller. Time does not appear to slow down to a person who is travelling fast. It appears to move at the same rate that it did when he was standing still. If you are going to comment on this stuff then at least have the integrity to learn it first.
Though I've never had an intelligent conversation with a new born
That's because even babies think you're stupid.
If they could talk they'd say: "Mom, who is the mad twit who keeps grinning at me while he talks about something called ultimate reality? Is he crazy or just a pedo?"
Irony.
You are EXACTLY the idiot I was thinking about.
For someone who ceaselessly chants, "ultimate reality" at everyone he sees like the wild-eyed, dogmatic lunatic you are, you don't seem to have much of a grasp on reality.
All are reduced with speed until they are ultimately reduced to zero at the speed of light, though only from the perspective of the one traveling at that speed.
You have things precisely the wrong way around, as per usual. Time is relative to the observer, not the traveller. Time passes as normal for anybody travelling at light speed. The disagreement happens when people watch from another frame of reference.
They are extinct dinosaurs of this failed Progressive socialistic ideology, but refuse to admit it
The one theme that runs unequivocally through the history of civilisation is that, over time, it has become steadily more progressive. Hence, such is your complete detachment from reality, you think social evolution itself demonstrates some kind of "failure".
Besides which, you don't even believe in dinosaurs, so you chose a terrible word to use as a weapon. According to your literal interpretation of The Bible, the world is only 6,000 years old.
He might go down as the grestest President in our lifetimes.
Ahahaha! If a child-beating, low intellect, militantly religious white nationalist like yourself believes that, then this only evidences how terrible he must be for sane people. Nobody wants to be endorsed by a rabidly delusional child abuser. Not even Trump.
I don't have a distorted view of science
Your distorted view of science was revealed by the question you just asked. It is absolutely clear as day that you do not understand how the law of probability factors into reality.
It is those like you that look to science as a way to live immoral lives that have the distorted view.
One of the things science teaches us is that morality is a human construct, so within the space of two sentences you have both denied your ignorance and doubled down on it. Congratulations.
