LarryElder's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of LarryElder's arguments, looking across every debate.
LarryElder(42) Clarified
1 point

"subversive activities"

The government should definitely police any crimes, but not thoughts.

Pretend to be a Conservative on social media for a day then.

1 point

Bronto Needs To Explain Why He Has Hitler's Birthday Marked On His Calendar

Looked on the waterfall and saw you were mocking Jews like Hitler again.

1 point

Ahahahahahaha! You mad little bastard. I'm the one who is "illiterate"??????????? Lmfao.

Hello Mr Hanson. I read your articles on and have a question on something you wrote in Enemies Of Language. In your article you refer to Nazi Germany as having been “right wing.” What are the things you believe made it right wing?

You left this part out clearly.

In short, I think Hitler and his predecessors were somewhat accurate in calling this hybrid movement of socialism at home and nationalism abroad Nationalsozialismus, and so we are mostly right in calling Nazism, as outsiders in World War II, who had to deal with its foreign policy, as “right-wing,” at least in comparison to Stalin’s left-wing version of mass extermination

AKA right of Stalin but still Socialist.

And it also points out that Stalin, whom you admire, was worse than Hitler concerning mass murders. In other words you admire worse than Hitler. God you're sick.

0 points

Your link literally debunks you:-

From the article:

National Socialism was an odd hybrid, reflecting both the adjective National and the noun Socialism. In Hitler’s view, socialism in the German context meant more or less what it implied: anti-capitalist screeds, lots of entitlements and government services, infrastructure building, deals for like-sounding corrupt cronies, and government supervised education, recreation, environmentalism, and employment.

But Nazi economics were not so all-inclusive socialist as communism

You laughing while seeming to be illiterate is kind of sad to witness really.

*Fiscal destruction: Confiscatory taxation of property and income in Nazi Germany

The second form of confiscatory taxation was a capital levy on wealth imposed in 1938 after the annexation of Austria. Earlier the same year, all assets had been registered with the local tax office. As with the migration tax, assessment was at book values according to the tax code to prevent undervaluation. The capital levy was first set at 20% and later increased retroactively to 25%, as the intended revenue target was originally not met. Based on its revenue, the implied net value of assets in 1938 would be 4.5 billion Reichsmarks, a value also cited in the 1947 source underlying Table 1. In a study of dispossession in Austria, Junz (2002) finds a slightly lower value of 4.3 billion Reichsmarks.

A third form of confiscatory taxation consisted two further levies. The first targeted the proceeds from the foreclosure of remaining businesses, imposed after the Kristallnacht pogroms of November 1938. The second consisted in the final transfer of all previously confiscated liquid assets to the central government budget under an executive order of November, 1941. Table 2 lists all fiscal dispossession in Germany excluding Austria after March 1938.

Table 2 Fiscal dispossession, 1938-1944 (billions of Reichsmarks)

0 points

I've asked you seven times to provide me with any qualified historian

0 points

(Dinesh Dsouza)

Every person that graduates from college takes history classes. It's required.

Dsouza was pardoned of his "felony"

Dsouza was a policy adviser in the administration of President Ronald Reagan.

Looks very qualified to me.

I've asked you seven times to provide me with any qualified historian. You're probably the most stupid and laughably dishonest person on Earth. Probably. It's either you or JustIgnoreMe.

It's you.

1 point

I mean people who have been to university, studied history and passed

Friedrich Hayek

Univesity of Vienna

New York University

1 point

I mean people who have been to university, studied history and passed.

Dinesh Dsouza

College: Dartmouth

1 point

You're a fucking joke. Literally all anybody has to do is view the title to see they are discussing the exact same one book ever written by anybody with any kind of academic qualification which has ever argued that the Nazis had anything to with socialism.

Not true. You've attacked two authors already, and I'm not going to list every book ever written after you claimed there were none even after I provided you multiple books.

One book. In the history of books. And not even written by a historian.

If it were "one book", and it wasn't, you'd still be wrong in saying it was "a consensus".

What a fucking laughing stock you are.

Your claim was proven false. By "laughing stock" you mean that you have no adult or logical response. I just proved your entire claim false. You lost the debate. Accept the L.

1 point

Dinesh Joseph D'Souza (/dɪˈnɛʃ dəˈsuːzə/; born April 25, 1961) is an Indian-born American author, filmmaker, convicted felon

Who was imprisoned by Obama for a "crime" that Obama had no problem with left wingers committing because he made a documentary about Obama.

and conspiracy theorist

The default smear title of the left for anyone who provides proof of the left conspiring.'Souza

What a fucking joke.

Wikipedia is a joke.

1 point

No I wasn't, or you'd have provided an example of a qualified historian

By "qualified historian" you mean only people who agree with you. Many historians and economists don't agree with you.

1 point

Translation: I'm fully aware that no historian on Earth agrees with me.

Dinesh Dsouza from India agrees with me.

The Neo Nazis from the 60s calling themselves Socialists agree with me.

1 point

Show me a qualified historian who disagrees that the Nazis were far right fascists.

Here's one by an economist from that actual time period who was from Austria.

1 point

No liar, I said there was a historical consensus.

And you were wrong.

Show me a qualified historian who disagrees that the Nazis were far right fascists.

Here's one by a guy from India with dark skin.

1 point

Secondly, there is no contradiction. There is a historical fact (i.e. The Nazis were fascists)

Fascists were Socialists. In fact no one spoke more of Socialism, idealism and statism than Fascists.

and there is you repeating the Nazis' own political propaganda. That is not a contradiction of any kind.

Saying there is a consensus, then pointing out a contradicting writer is a contradiction.

1 point

It is perfectly possible

It's impossible to have two contradictory things exist at once. Are you even familiar with how basic philosophy works?

because as I've already pointed out you are a liar who is telling lie after lie after lie after lie.

And you haven't proven anything to be a lie. Not one single thing. You made a claim that contradicted left and right wing fact checkers, so I HAVE proven that you have lied.

There is one book, written by an economist (i.e. not a historian) which does not even make the claim you are trying to attribute to it.

After saying there is a consensus, you provide me a book contradicting that "consensus"? Nevermind that there are many more books written by people from every walk of life that contradict that "consensus"???

It argues that there were socialist elements to the Nazi economy

This hardly proves any of your claims.

debunked repeatedly by other economists

Left wing activists leaving out context, history, and data because that's what left wing activists not only do, but claimed to do throughout history.

° pazm9uO5zv1w9qs8jo11280.jpg


1 point

Suck my dick.

No thank you.

You've used at least ten accounts just in the last hour to spread your vile Nazi bullshit.

Listing left wing fact checking sites that disprove your narrative is not "Nazi propaganda" or "using 10 different acoounts", and you will not be able to explain HOW it is "Nazi propaganda".

1 point

Let me repeat myself, since you seem to be too busy swapping accounts to read. He was the precise opposite of a socialist and there is COMPLETE HISTORICAL CONSENSUS about this.

It's impossible to have a "complete consensus" when books abound making the opposite claim.

Every claim you make is false and/or misleading because that is what Nazi ideology is all about. Lie, confuse, misdirect and deceive

You are yet to show one single claim being false.

1 point

You are not qualified to tell us what the "left wing narrative" is

The left tells you what the narrative was. Then they debunked them. In the links.

You are a Nazi who has lied probably 40 times in the last 25 posts.

List them here.

1 point

Once again, false. You claimed the quote had been "debunked", but then admitted in your next post that it had not been debunked.

The left wing narrative that he claimed white supremacists were fine people has been debunked by the left. You haven't taken on any link or it's claims nor its evidence. You are a liar.

I also have no idea why you are dropping links.

A grown man would understand. An educated brain would understand. You do not understand.

1 point

He was the precise opposite of a socialist and there is complete historical consensus about this fact.

There are books from that time period that make the opposite claim and show him practicing Socialism. There would be no logical reason to pretend to be a Socialist for anyone other than Socialists.

1 point

This has been debunked thousands of times.

You can't debunk something he actually said. You're stupid and insane.

He said the sentence, but not about white supremacists. It was about two sets of protesters at a statue, neither of which were white supremacists. He also rebuked white supremacy and white supremacist groups multiple times. The left creating a fake narrative is what was debunked.

1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]