- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Ahahahahahaha! You mad little bastard. I'm the one who is "illiterate"??????????? Lmfao.
Hello Mr Hanson. I read your articles on Townhall.com and have a question on something you wrote in Enemies Of Language. In your article you refer to Nazi Germany as having been “right wing.” What are the things you believe made it right wing?
You left this part out clearly.
In short, I think Hitler and his predecessors were somewhat accurate in calling this hybrid movement of socialism at home and nationalism abroad Nationalsozialismus, and so we are mostly right in calling Nazism, as outsiders in World War II, who had to deal with its foreign policy, as “right-wing,” at least in comparison to Stalin’s left-wing version of mass extermination
AKA right of Stalin but still Socialist.
And it also points out that Stalin, whom you admire, was worse than Hitler concerning mass murders. In other words you admire worse than Hitler. God you're sick.
Your link literally debunks you:-
From the article:
National Socialism was an odd hybrid, reflecting both the adjective National and the noun Socialism. In Hitler’s view, socialism in the German context meant more or less what it implied: anti-capitalist screeds, lots of entitlements and government services, infrastructure building, deals for like-sounding corrupt cronies, and government supervised education, recreation, environmentalism, and employment.
But Nazi economics were not so all-inclusive socialist as communism
You laughing while seeming to be illiterate is kind of sad to witness really.
*Fiscal destruction: Confiscatory taxation of property and income in Nazi Germany
The second form of confiscatory taxation was a capital levy on wealth imposed in 1938 after the annexation of Austria. Earlier the same year, all assets had been registered with the local tax office. As with the migration tax, assessment was at book values according to the tax code to prevent undervaluation. The capital levy was first set at 20% and later increased retroactively to 25%, as the intended revenue target was originally not met. Based on its revenue, the implied net value of assets in 1938 would be 4.5 billion Reichsmarks, a value also cited in the 1947 source underlying Table 1. In a study of dispossession in Austria, Junz (2002) finds a slightly lower value of 4.3 billion Reichsmarks.
A third form of confiscatory taxation consisted two further levies. The first targeted the proceeds from the foreclosure of remaining businesses, imposed after the Kristallnacht pogroms of November 1938. The second consisted in the final transfer of all previously confiscated liquid assets to the central government budget under an executive order of November, 1941. Table 2 lists all fiscal dispossession in Germany excluding Austria after March 1938.
Table 2 Fiscal dispossession, 1938-1944 (billions of Reichsmarks)
Every person that graduates from college takes history classes. It's required.
Dsouza was pardoned of his "felony"
Dsouza was a policy adviser in the administration of President Ronald Reagan.
Looks very qualified to me.
I've asked you seven times to provide me with any qualified historian. You're probably the most stupid and laughably dishonest person on Earth. Probably. It's either you or JustIgnoreMe.
You're a fucking joke. Literally all anybody has to do is view the title to see they are discussing the exact same one book ever written by anybody with any kind of academic qualification which has ever argued that the Nazis had anything to with socialism.
Not true. You've attacked two authors already, and I'm not going to list every book ever written after you claimed there were none even after I provided you multiple books.
One book. In the history of books. And not even written by a historian.
If it were "one book", and it wasn't, you'd still be wrong in saying it was "a consensus".
What a fucking laughing stock you are.
Your claim was proven false. By "laughing stock" you mean that you have no adult or logical response. I just proved your entire claim false. You lost the debate. Accept the L.
Dinesh Joseph D'Souza (/dɪˈnɛʃ dəˈsuːzə/; born April 25, 1961) is an Indian-born American author, filmmaker, convicted felon
Who was imprisoned by Obama for a "crime" that Obama had no problem with left wingers committing because he made a documentary about Obama.
and conspiracy theorist
The default smear title of the left for anyone who provides proof of the left conspiring.
What a fucking joke.
Wikipedia is a joke.
Show me a qualified historian who disagrees that the Nazis were far right fascists.
Here's one by an economist from that actual time period who was from Austria.
No liar, I said there was a historical consensus.
And you were wrong.
Show me a qualified historian who disagrees that the Nazis were far right fascists.
Here's one by a guy from India with dark skin.
Secondly, there is no contradiction. There is a historical fact (i.e. The Nazis were fascists)
Fascists were Socialists. In fact no one spoke more of Socialism, idealism and statism than Fascists.
and there is you repeating the Nazis' own political propaganda. That is not a contradiction of any kind.
Saying there is a consensus, then pointing out a contradicting writer is a contradiction.
It is perfectly possible
It's impossible to have two contradictory things exist at once. Are you even familiar with how basic philosophy works?
because as I've already pointed out you are a liar who is telling lie after lie after lie after lie.
And you haven't proven anything to be a lie. Not one single thing. You made a claim that contradicted left and right wing fact checkers, so I HAVE proven that you have lied.
There is one book, written by an economist (i.e. not a historian) which does not even make the claim you are trying to attribute to it.
After saying there is a consensus, you provide me a book contradicting that "consensus"? Nevermind that there are many more books written by people from every walk of life that contradict that "consensus"???
It argues that there were socialist elements to the Nazi economy
This hardly proves any of your claims.
debunked repeatedly by other economists
Left wing activists leaving out context, history, and data because that's what left wing activists not only do, but claimed to do throughout history.
Suck my dick.
No thank you.
You've used at least ten accounts just in the last hour to spread your vile Nazi bullshit.
Listing left wing fact checking sites that disprove your narrative is not "Nazi propaganda" or "using 10 different acoounts", and you will not be able to explain HOW it is "Nazi propaganda".
Let me repeat myself, since you seem to be too busy swapping accounts to read. He was the precise opposite of a socialist and there is COMPLETE HISTORICAL CONSENSUS about this.
It's impossible to have a "complete consensus" when books abound making the opposite claim.
Every claim you make is false and/or misleading because that is what Nazi ideology is all about. Lie, confuse, misdirect and deceive
You are yet to show one single claim being false.
Once again, false. You claimed the quote had been "debunked", but then admitted in your next post that it had not been debunked.
The left wing narrative that he claimed white supremacists were fine people has been debunked by the left. You haven't taken on any link or it's claims nor its evidence. You are a liar.
I also have no idea why you are dropping links.
A grown man would understand. An educated brain would understand. You do not understand.
He was the precise opposite of a socialist and there is complete historical consensus about this fact.
There are books from that time period that make the opposite claim and show him practicing Socialism. There would be no logical reason to pretend to be a Socialist for anyone other than Socialists.
Right, so you're telling lies again. Thanks.
You are according to left and right wing fact checkers. Thanks.
This has been debunked thousands of times.
You can't debunk something he actually said. You're stupid and insane.
He said the sentence, but not about white supremacists. It was about two sets of protesters at a statue, neither of which were white supremacists. He also rebuked white supremacy and white supremacist groups multiple times. The left creating a fake narrative is what was debunked.