lol whatever guy/girl/whatever the fuck you want to call yourself.

I will no longer waste time on you.

have a good one.

No, Intangible. I have been an asshole in the eyes and mindsets of you, and a couple others. That does not make me an asshole. Simply because you say it is I'm supposed to believe it and accept it? Trust me, I will admit I am an asshole on this board when I am an asshole on this board. Thus far on this board I can't be an asshole for the things people say and do on this board negates and nullifies me from being an asshole.

Again, you claim "that is how you are". I'm simply defending myself from insults and attacks from a couple of you people. Especially coming from you and a couple others, I care not. For all I know you're just some inhuman computer bot. Or some weird dude chillin on his computer. And for all you know I could be a crazy lunatic, or some saint, or whatever. It doesn't matter what we both think of each other.

This is a debate site and this particular session is a "roast", so give it all you've got. However, do not expect me to not respond to certain posts that I feel like I want to respond to. And if you think I'm an asshole. Cool, power to you. I don't care to change your minds.

There is NOTHING you can teach me. Do not try. Try otherwise. Do not attempt to sway me towards this or that with your fallacies. Fuck off. Don't you get that? I'm sure you do.

hahahahahahahah .

leter letter

NO! I know that what you think of me is irrelevant. In simple terms. What you think does not mean anything to me, to many others.

I know that your beliefs are not important.

Thats what I KNOW.

I know who and where I am.

You cannot sway me this or that.

And with that, I say I will do what I must and are you to say otherwise. :D

Thank YOU for proving MY point . ;) wink wink

pompous

arrogant

crazy

asshole

HAHAHAHAAH

All of you are more lost than I.

And I am finding my way, as of recently, of course, momentarily.

Where are you?....

And which one are you? Ha! You don't fool me. GUY.

You're more than an asshole. That is greater than a crazy asshole.

92 percent.

Too many trolls.

Too many religious bashers.

Too many depressed people.

Too many people who think that not laughing at dumb jokes equals not humorous.

Pffffffffft. Get over yourselves.

Ah shut the fuck up Cynical .

Oh shucks, I don't know what to say.

Thanks for all the kind words from all of my fans!

Well it's Links shield from Zelda . ;)

Yeah thanks I've been told many times .

Well that is your problem

At least you get the point

yeah something about 50 character

It's relevant. Tell me it's not.

Focus on the important points rather than asking questions to ask questions. Or saying things just to say things.

It's mostly personal. Obviously it is societal in the sense that individuals speak for their particular society in many shapes and forms.

Further, every human being has beliefs, in X, Y, Z. And there are many beliefs with many evidences. There are beliefs with little evidence, yet a human being cannot believe in something without evidence, this is true to the human being.

So yes , no beliefs are formed without evidence, to answer your question.

Define evidence is the key thing here.

Obviously many people have issues with the forms of evidence.

Hah, imaginary friend, Right. LOL

Do you feel the ambition deep down to figure out the truth?

I do.

Yet you have problems with those that believe, as if it affects you? lol!

Get over yourself.

We're all trying to figure out WHAT THE FUCK is going on.

Yet you get mad at people that believe in anything. Nice job.

hahahaha.

Okay.

Here's the way it is.

Evidence is in many shapes and forms, and is accepted or denied by many, respectively pertaining to their particular beliefs.

Within science, they're all about empirical data, whilst simultaneously acknowledging things, such as dark matter, or frequencies beyond the human threshold, or things that science has yet to "understand".

Within spirituality and region, they too are about evidence, yet their evidence is mostly based upon faith and empirical data (physical testimony and scientific data). Whilst simultaneously understanding that spirituality and religion has yet to "understand" the world around them.

Similar to science.

And so, they're both after the same thing, the truth of the world around them.

Science claims "the BEST evidence for truth is empirical data."

Spirituality/religion claims "the BEST evidence for truth is both faith and empirical data".

So why the discrepancy? It is obvious both are searching for the truth.

GOD IS NOT DELUSIONAL. IT IS NATURAL FOR A HUMAN TO BELIEVE IN GOD.

So you're just trying to attempt to point out a flaw with the statement "nothing comes from something" (thanks to theists), rather than anything that's personal to you? Okay...

What would you say if a theist says "something comes from something"...would you still ask "what came before that something"? Like an endless cycle?

Why does it matter to you personally to find an answer to the 'what' in "What created God?"?

And if you find an answer that suites you either way, what will that accomplish?

I ask these questions because personally, to me, it does not matter what created God. The question is what, if anything, created us? No need to go further beyond what we're already having trouble trying to understand.

It's not a matter of which God is correct or wrong. It's the matter that there is something there. Is it not?

I'm not in the business of saying, X, Y Z is right, or wrong.

I'm an advocate of stating the fact that there is something there. And X, Y, Z people call it respectively.

You, as well as many other, seem to be so focused on that X is wrong.

So to answer your question: Humans are curious; Humans want to know more than what they see; Humans believe in many different things..

It doesn't matter who is right or wrong.

What matters is that there is something there...Whats your point>?

Please refrain from spreading lies, you troll wannabe anti God prick.

Did you forget that God allowed his son to be nailed on the cross? And you think God could not have stopped that from happening?

Since you're the one here referencing the bible, I figured I'd rebuttal you with that.

The point made above is the point; sacrifice for mankind.

If you truly believe that God is not all powerful and if you don't fear God, naturally, you're already more lost than the lost religious person.

The minimum argument length is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible.