CreateDebate


Manastacious's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Manastacious's arguments, looking across every debate.
3 points

This quote has been taken out of context, and in the way that it is presented here has completely lost the meaning behind it. The idea behind what Obama said is this: that there is always someone that stood behind you and supported you in your ventures. To say that Obama is claiming that the government is the sole reason for success is wildly incorrect. Everyone has a teacher or someone who supported their ventures. No single person has the ability to make a successful business without the help of someone else. The easiest way to correct the outrage surrounding the quote when taken out of context is simply to add the word alone.

YOU DID NOT BUILD THAT ALONE!

Fallacies:

-- Appeal to pity

-- Appeal to Emotion

Also, bciara96, in the case that the mother was endangered by giving birth to the child, wouldn't that make the one who made abortion illegal the one who decided whether the woman should live or die. To use your own words: What if this was you? or What if it was your mother?

2 points

"He is responsible for our birth and our death"

So, wouldn't he be reesponsible for the abortion? That is saying the abortion is killing a human life, which it is not.

2 points

LenaHMorris. If you are going to debate on this site, the others of this community, and myself would appreciate it if you would use correct english. It would make your arguments more cohesive as well as make you sound less like an imbecile who doesn't know how to use a period. Thank you.

I am confused.

The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters.

I suggest that people in the future invent a time machine, go back in time and kill the idiot who is running the company, the oil rig and all the other idiots who caused this accident. :)

I am disputing for one reason. Academics are necessary out in the real world, and thusly should be taught to everyone it should not be a choice. However as you stated, not everyone is going to be or wants to be a professional athlete. It should be based on choice.

Nope, any logical person who was smart enough to develop a device to travel in time, would be smart enough to go back in time and give it to themselves, therefore eliminating a need to create it in the first place, therefore they couldn't have invented it in the first place, and therefore couldn't go back in time to give it to himself. Thus I present to you, the Time paradox.

2 points

Bush caused this entire mess with his war. He got us into a mess and now Obama has no means to fix it. Just as in many things there is not a magic fix that does everything. Obama has gone a long way to begin the recovery process. That began when Bush was no longer president. What people need to realize is, with all this criticism people are failing to recognize what Obama has done. In a haystack, its hard to find the needle of truth.

2 points

Seeing as it is one of the cleanest forms of energy that can be produced, yes. There is historical precedence for Nuclear melt downs, but they have all been caused by HUMAN error, not machine.

4 points

Males are just as good students as females. Being a good student relies on your focus, attitude, and overall drive to do well.

2 points

I feel that Batman is more "super" because he is more realistic, also the Batmobile is pretty darn awesome.

2 points

You're big boned, that is all. :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)

2 points

There should be stricter limits on who should be able to continualy use the site. Arguments such as " Yes! The minimum length for an argument is 50 characters. The purpose of this restriction is to cut down on the amount of dumb jokes, so we can keep the quality of debate and discourse as high as possible." and "Uh.. no cuz that wud be like so uncool man" should be unacceptable and to many of those would result in prohibition from the sites. Otherwise, sometimes I find some High Schooler's or even Middle Schooler's opinions more in depth than others. Of course since I myself am in High School, I would be against and age restriction.

Why should conservatives be allowed to take over the US? Your logic is both flawed, unsupported, and downright prejudiced and idiotic

3 points

You need more perosonae:

BK-Burger King burger Flipper

DT-Donald Trump

OW-Old Woman

VV-Vietnam Veteran

DP-Dead Person

II-Illegal immigrant

ARE YOU KIDDING??

Just because someone does not agree with your views does not mean you or anyone has the right to ship them out of the country. That is contradicting the morals that this country was founded on. To say something like that is just like saying that we need to ship all the Mexicans out of the country, or all of the Indians. It's not racist but the views are extremely alike.

All I have to say to contribut to this debate!!

AMENDMENTS!!

2 points

IF you know the issues and care enough to vote, than yes. Otherwise most people this age would not waste their time voting.

2 points

Before reading my argument do know that I am very anti-drug and especially anti-tobacco.

I believe that no drug should be illegal, banned, prohibited, or otherwise gotten rid of. The failure of the prohibition movement in the United States shows that prohibiting substances does not work. Actions should be taken, however, and those actions should be taxing. If it costs an upwards of $15 to buy a pack of cigarettes or $40 dollars for 750ml of cheap vodka, usage would be drastically reduced, but that does not mean that they should be illegal.

A. there is no reason to bring personal things into a debate

B. My parents intended to have a child. Planned pregnancies are different from impregnation via traumatic experiences.

Kinda, sort of, maybe.

I beleive that Tobacco products should not be banned. However, I believe that tobacco products, as well as all drugs, should be taxed extremely high. If a single pack of cigarettes, or a single tub of dip were $20-$30 then, most people would stop using the tobacco, or any other drug.

2 points

Yes, they do to a certain extent. The child is there's to monitor, nurture, and guide until he becomes an adult. At that point the parents have no say in the child's futur . That does not keep them from having their input on what the child does, but that does not allow them to completely control them.


1 of 3 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]