- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
I read the Constitution.. We have a right to protest.. It doesn't say that you have to AGREE with the reason for the protest.. The right to protest is sacrosanct even if you HATE the reasons why it's being done.
Your reasoning would support someone putting a bomb in your car in the name of free speech.
Read it again. Clearly, it's not ME who's saying the appointment is unconstitutional.. It's George Conway
Quote from Excon:
What's CRAZY about this site is that MOST of the debates are about the words someone WROTE.. I don't participate in those debates because they're STUPID.. What someone WROTE, is what they fucking WROTE..
What's CRAZY about this site is that MOST of the debates are about the words someone WROTE.. I don't participate in those debates because they're STUPID
It looks like the words are yours. You claimed the Constitution to defend vandalism, harrassment and threat of assault when none of that is protected by the Constitution anywhere. And as I remember, you've gotten mad about 1/50th being done to a Liberal.
I write the Kings English.. What I SUPPORT is clear, and what I DON'T support is equally clear..
You are the least clear person on the site. You say constitutional constantly but never can tell us what's in the Constitution.
Outlaw is a Right winger. Bronto is a Conservative. Nom is a Marxist. Mingiwuwu is a Marxist. AlofRI is a Democrat. No one knows what you are.